Hearthpwn

Made it sound like you hit legendary in 13 wins, was like wait a min that's not possible xD Think the only 1 star win streak bonus is low tho, or maybe I did't get high enough with 14 streak.

Since you said part and not parts I guess I need to pick one and it would have to be the new ranking system, I'm happy to see we will finally have a meaningful reason for doing Play mode and not the generic "Im a 3 star master /flex, dude, it has no meaning, you get get it in 20 wins".

I do feel with the system they have put in there tho that 1 month is too short. Why? Because with this system you need a minimum and highly unlikely 125 wins in a row(pending what this win streak bonus becomes) which = 4,16 wins every day of a 30 day month to just get into the ladder to THEN start your ladder climb,Now of course this number goes up every single time you lose. So I really really like such a "heavy" ranking system but I would want the reset to be at least 2 months, Perfect would be 3 months in my opinion.

DE'd a golden sylvanas for king krush, not regretted it since, next on the list is as it looks now thalos unless I get him in one of the free packs till next sunday.

You forgot a strawpoll option: have beta,am down but EU ;)

Quote from Ihmo »

Quote from Faladrath »

now anyone without any legendaries or epics and just a couple of rares can get to masters 3, sad but it wont last so all good for now.

Epics and legendaries aren't that important, IMO.

I agree it was more to the crowd of " This game is pay to win, I need legendaries and epics to have a chance to win QQ"

Yeah masters 3 means nothing atm, Once they make some kind of sc2 ranking system or the likes and release grand master lvl we will start to see differences, now anyone without any legendaries or epics and just a couple of rares can get to masters 3, sad but it wont last so all good for now.

I was gonna reply in a helpful way till I read"  And please, don't give me that "play normal ranked mode, not arena" since arena gives ALOT more prizes even if you lose three times straight (like i do all the time, since i dont have any good cards)."

Obvious troll is obvious.

Hm? Your claiming to be the only control deck in the last 4 tournaments? Or did I miss something?

Quote from angelcrest »

Alpha seems to go well with charge minions as it buffs them the same turn they can attack , it can also buff the mirror images, knife juggler could hit something I don't want like an enrage minion, I usually just freeze or ignore my opponents minions unless they are a huge threat or are slowly massing. Plus people see knife jugler as a huge threat so they usually remove it right away. But Alpha is not a huge threat so people usually ignore it which is why it's great. I can use it's bonus right away with my charge minions and it is possible to turn 1 mirror images then turn 2 wolf in between to deal 2 dmg right away and also be able to slow some progress since I can both ping my opponents minions and use the 1 attack of the images (both defense and offence). I suppose knife juggler would provide more dmg but I think the control of the dmg and the benefit of placing after other minions as well before could make them closer, but definately the less priority thing is something. My opponents usually don't wanna waste a spell on a measly 2/2 with a medium effect

Good reasoning, I'll give it a whirl tomorrow^^ Thanks for sharing.

Seems like what I meet in the last tourney, tho it was a knife juggler in there to do 4 free dmg to me as he plumped down 2x mirror images but the rest seems identical. But my question is, why the Alpha? For later to drop with a charger or 2 even for the extra 1-2 dmg?

The odd ball out like finalfuntasy was the only warrior in but got to 3rd in a toruney 2 weeks back doesn't mean there are a lot of them xD Shame we don't get a class break down( or I haven't found it) of MLG like we did with the MG one, yes you can change class between rounds but I doubt many does this.

Reason aggro is topping it is cause the last MG one(before MLG) we had an very high amount of control decks, winner being one of them so aggro spam would only be the normal reaction to this.

Quote from Cial »

 

End of the day you guys have a right to your opinion, as do I, but the Priest as it is right now can't go live. 

That's your opinion, I dont know what it's based of, be it a 1-2 ragegame loss to MC in diamond or if it is what it should be 100+++ games in play mode with competitive decks at masters 3.I doubt it is the last one cause as it's been stated already, priests perform good mid ladder but high they just don't cut it. How you got to MC being the best card in the game is baffling, the priest use up his/her turn more or less on getting a creature of your board for 8. Any removal will negate this.So to fix your last sentence "End of the day you a right to your opinion, as do I, but the Priest as it is right now is pretty average to weak in high-end play mode."

2nd wave as in the wave after open beta started.Gotten a 2nd later, gave it away.

Quote from MSW112 »

"Fun" note: The only decent competitive priests play aggro ;)

I dont know if you have Ekop qualify as decent but he tried aggro priest last MG(before MLG) and got top 16 but that was it. I personally as you've pointed out tho don't find priests hard at all but just depends on your deck. If your seriously concerned about priests(@op) start getting more 4/x in your deck, also most competitive priests I've seen only roll with 1 sw:d as it's uses are far more limited then a sw:p usually that is, late game druids wold be the big exception^^

Are we sure he is talking about expert AI? But yeah, Tehstool as usual got some sound advice^^