My bet is that hunters, rogues, paladins and mages will be the most used decks... So I'm thinking if follow the flow or be anti meta...
Where are you getting rogues from? Them with warriors and druids was the least used classes used last time.The one warrior in it just used a molten giant gimmick deck, all rogues did't get very far. So if you wanna be a special snowflake go one of those 3 classes :p
Sounds good, maybe run a test once you registration clunkyness is fixed to see the interest, the open one has quite the interest so would think one with prizes will too, unless they except prize tournaments to be free entry too xD
Judging by the teams joined so far, we need to create a new team. Not correctly setup or working as intended, if so why?
Its a bit clunky at the moment as mlg is designed for teams not for single players, so as its tuned for HS this problem will probably resolve itself
I was just puzzled as to why we couldn't just sign up with the team we made last week. I assume that's not how it works for other games etc, Having to reform a team every tournament?
Looks good, got the registration with tag in properly this time so should confused a lot less people and make for a faster tourney.And removing somewhat the rock-paper-scissor problem.
We just meet in ranked it seems, but yeah see the surprise you bring, tho if I had a unleash in my 8 card hand you'd be dead the round before, maybe next time ;)
Was fun, not surprising a control mage took it all the way home since there was a lot of them tho I was thinking it would be Lothar as he had a flawless run till he ran into the 2nd place player which was his hard counter from lack of aoe in his deck which had worked very will till then but the warlock murloc got him who also manged to dodge all control mages(with aoe) till the very end.
Surprising was that one of the 2(?) warriors got to 3rd, that's quite cool^^
Also surprising was Tomatos that barely got into the top 16 knocked out the only player who had gone flawless in ro7 (Tialol)
A very very tiny % of the player base can put this deck together as it's legendary heavy. But it works very well, tho you can get the same result in ranked much cheaper then this^^
You don't need to spend money on this, I haven't, if you get good at arena, use the gold you earn from dailies/wins to enter arena. If you get good and keep a 72%+ win rate you go in the positive and thus gaining free 1-2 packs each arena run.
Yeah getting that amount is lucky, The change they made with the golden card reward was just a business move cause many times now I get like 20-50g profit only, which was higher pre-wipe but the gold cards keep taking a slot and so less gold on average on 8-9 wins = more ppl need to buy into arena.
But yeah getting to 7 and 9 the 1st time is a lot of fun^^ And as you say once your in the money you relax a bit. But once/if you can keep a 70%+ win rate you wont be content with 7 wins anymore ;)
Well can't see the high end of that deck but I would like to hear your logic on how that deck sucks as it has a lot of great cards in them.
Cards in question in you deck:Naturalize(could help in a pinch but generally a v bad card),geomancer(bad but could in cases be very valueable specially with swipe which you had 3 of), savagery(nerfed hard and devalued but you have a bite and a claw so could have a place in your deck) and booty bay(just bad but don't know what other picks you had to choose from.) And that's it, rest are good picks, so this deck doesn't suck at all^^ And that is missing the last 5 high cost cards to judge from.
0
Where are you getting rogues from? Them with warriors and druids was the least used classes used last time.The one warrior in it just used a molten giant gimmick deck, all rogues did't get very far. So if you wanna be a special snowflake go one of those 3 classes :p
0
Seems they are running a trial http://gamebattles.majorleaguegaming.com/pc/hearthstone-heroes-of-warcraft/tournament/eu-hearthstone-extravaganza/info with the 50% cut. Let's see if it gets any traction, I'll probably sign up later, I do think they should drop 10-20%(still 50% to the winner) onto the 2nd place as well along with credits tho.
0
Sounds good, maybe run a test once you registration clunkyness is fixed to see the interest, the open one has quite the interest so would think one with prizes will too, unless they except prize tournaments to be free entry too xD
0
I was just puzzled as to why we couldn't just sign up with the team we made last week. I assume that's not how it works for other games etc, Having to reform a team every tournament?
0
Judging by the teams joined so far, we need to create a new team. Not correctly setup or working as intended, if so why?
0
Looks good, got the registration with tag in properly this time so should confused a lot less people and make for a faster tourney.And removing somewhat the rock-paper-scissor problem.
0
Yeah got around to the pming, Still terribly setup but it's the 1st one so can only get better^^
0
Well my opponent changed his into it so we could play but I cannot change mine unless I have 25 credits correct?
Tho I see ppl have played without anyone having the tag in their name, how?
0
Brackets are up but no battletag in names, how are we to find our opponent?
0
We just meet in ranked it seems, but yeah see the surprise you bring, tho if I had a unleash in my 8 card hand you'd be dead the round before, maybe next time ;)
0
Was fun, not surprising a control mage took it all the way home since there was a lot of them tho I was thinking it would be Lothar as he had a flawless run till he ran into the 2nd place player which was his hard counter from lack of aoe in his deck which had worked very will till then but the warlock murloc got him who also manged to dodge all control mages(with aoe) till the very end.
Surprising was that one of the 2(?) warriors got to 3rd, that's quite cool^^
Also surprising was Tomatos that barely got into the top 16 knocked out the only player who had gone flawless in ro7 (Tialol)
Rock,scissor,paper ftw^^
0
A very very tiny % of the player base can put this deck together as it's legendary heavy. But it works very well, tho you can get the same result in ranked much cheaper then this^^
0
You don't need to spend money on this, I haven't, if you get good at arena, use the gold you earn from dailies/wins to enter arena. If you get good and keep a 72%+ win rate you go in the positive and thus gaining free 1-2 packs each arena run.
0
Yeah getting that amount is lucky, The change they made with the golden card reward was just a business move cause many times now I get like 20-50g profit only, which was higher pre-wipe but the gold cards keep taking a slot and so less gold on average on 8-9 wins = more ppl need to buy into arena.
But yeah getting to 7 and 9 the 1st time is a lot of fun^^ And as you say once your in the money you relax a bit. But once/if you can keep a 70%+ win rate you wont be content with 7 wins anymore ;)
0
Well can't see the high end of that deck but I would like to hear your logic on how that deck sucks as it has a lot of great cards in them.
Cards in question in you deck:Naturalize(could help in a pinch but generally a v bad card),geomancer(bad but could in cases be very valueable specially with swipe which you had 3 of), savagery(nerfed hard and devalued but you have a bite and a claw so could have a place in your deck) and booty bay(just bad but don't know what other picks you had to choose from.) And that's it, rest are good picks, so this deck doesn't suck at all^^ And that is missing the last 5 high cost cards to judge from.