Hearthpwn

So far the biggest benefit that I have gotten from him besides the obvious 4 armor is that everyone wants to kill him fast. Which gives my other more important legendary's room to survive.

True lol

Omg the hunter kept winning the "If your card costs more gain (x)". I kept drawing the same 1 mana card each time.

EDIT: I still won lol.

Good work. I love having it in my deck. I think I play more classes that don't play secrets then I do but when I do I get such good benefits out of it.

Very fun deck to play. Beat a pally 1st try. Thank you +1

I wish I had the card draw RNG to use this deck because it seems pretty solid.

lol I don't know who voted us down. I added it also and it won me the game. Guy had taunts and having diving shield was perfect.

I don't have 2 doomhammers so I added him lol. lets see how it works.

Quote from Gahzrilla jump

(I dont watch tournaments, so who won those tournament you mentioned? Was it someone playing grim patron warrior? Did grim patron warrior?)

Hey again. Totally forgot to post but watching another tournament made me think of this. I am not going to be able to watch the whole tournament but I can tell you the only warriors going on right now is patron warriors which were 4. On top of that each patron warrior deck won their match and 2 of the decks won with grim patron itself. While the other 2 did board clears and a heck lot of damage with grim patron. So according to the stats so far patron has a 100% win ratio lol. Tournament is called Team League Championships and it is going on right now.

The deck is really fun if you can get the draws. Maybe it is my draw RNG but so far the last 4 games I have started with only spells lol. No matter how hard I mulligan. I still won 2 of the games because they lasted a long time

I am having so much fun with this deck! Thanks for sharing it.

I didn't think I needed to respond further but after watching 2 tournaments where every single warrior was a grim patron and each warrior won a game makes my point even stronger. Why do you think everyone and their mother is playing a patron warrior? Because it's bad? Because it is srs good and I can't believe how easy it was to combo it out. This in a way is like undertaker and look what happened to that? I bet you thought there was nothing wrong with that either. I can understand why so many people like it and want to defend it. Who wants a 90% win rate deck to get nerfed?

Overall main reason (Since you have trouble interpreting my posts) is it is extremely easy to combo it and there are to many ways to one turn swing a game. Did not see one player playing the deck have trouble or couldn't find the cards to combo it.

Quote from Dustincr »

You could try cutting TBK and Alex and adding in a few anti-aggro techs (another MFB, Healbot, Annoy-o-tron). 2 9-manacost dragons seems excessive and I don't feel like TBK is that much value in this meta.

Good idea I will be trying those additions. Thanks.

Quote from Gahzrilla »

Quote from EZ3James »

I 100% agree. I don't know who down voted you but I think this card is annoying and needs to be cut down to size. There is a reason why 19 out of 20 warriors I vs are Grim Patron warriors. Because it is to easy to win when you have the right combo. My pally deck i might as well concede because just so little removal to take out the mass number of them.

Your pally deck cant beat grim patron warrior, so grim patron is OP? It is easy to win when you have the rightcombo, but you have to GET the right combo. Just because you think it's "annoying" doesn't mean they will nerf it. Oh yeah, Control Warrior takes 10K+ dust to make, while Grim Patron Warrior (Senfglas version) costs 700 dust. That's enough reason for the supposed 19 to 20 ratio against Control Warrior, at least in lower ranks.

 

 

By your 1st sentence I can tell you don't even understand what I am saying. The card is really good and can easily get out of hand. That is why i think it needs to be nerfed. I have a feel that the people that down voted me don't even understand that lol as I can tell you don't. A card should really have more than a few ways to get countered by almost every deck IMO to put fairness into it. When playing Grim you don't even need that many cards to take it so far.