-
- Abzeroth
- Registered User
-
Member for 10 years, 4 months, and 8 days
Last active Sun, Apr, 28 2024 08:00:21 -
- 11
- 39
- 63
- 4 Followers
- 2,139 Total Posts
- 905 Thanks
⚙
Learn More
Cosmetics
Related Cards
Card Pools
✕
×
PopCard Settings
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Elements settings
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
0
I used this warlock to hit legendary from 20. I never made any changes. Beats hunters and zoo alike. Only trouble is those pesky priest and warrior.
i want to keep climbing higher but should I switch decks or do u think this will be okay in Legendary ranks?
http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/115444-20-to-legend-60-win-rate-215-games
0
If you give them the wins it'll cheapen the card back. Sucks if they lose but would suck more to know they were handed the card back.
0
yesterday I was at rank 1 with 2 stars. 44 games later I'm at rank 1 with 2 stars. Fml
0
3 months... Perma man! The gold and achievements they got are insane and would easily tide theM over for 3 months.
2
I disagree. When facing hunters and other warlock, I always always mulligan for a voidwalker and an abusive sergeant, especially if im playing turn 1, since this combo clears their buffed undertaker on turn two. this leaves you with board control. I do think if this is meant to be a control then zombie is better than leper for turn 1 Since it'll survive common drops like cleric, undertaker, etc.
what is the purpose of Harrison jones? Is he meant to draw cards or remove weapons? If remove weapon then ooze is a better option for your curve, and won't screw you when you want to play your doom guard or soul fire.
0
coward! always go for face!
0
I think before one legendary, you should make the ancient of lores and cabal shadow priests. That's 1600 dust. Those cards are pretty much essential in most druid/priest decks. If you make cenarius then your druid decks would lack the lores. Harrison is mainly used in control warrior so how much do you fancy that? Same for Jaraxxus in Handlock and Vancleef in tempo.
I say get those 4 epics to make life easier for cenarius and co!
0
Thanks. I think ill stick with my deck FOR NOW as it seems to be highly favored when I get the coin at 88% and a loser without it 36%.
Boy that coin sure is powerful stuff haha
0
I'm at rank 4 and so far played 7 hunters straight (hearth stats yay) and at 50% win rate, which is no good for going up. What deck plays well against hunter deathrattle decks?
0
I think this has been solved! Just in case you didn't know, Webspinner can grab you ANY beast, from the lowliest 1 mana to the highest legendaries.
0
I used to run Alexstraza in my shaman deck as a defense mechanism, but I dont have her in a single deck any more. I assume you're fighting warriors?
0
Now hold on, what do you mean by consistent?
You mean winning consistently? Being able to battle all classes equally? Has no weaknesses or strengths?
I played Zoo from 20 to 5 with 73% win rate because of the SPEED I can go through games. I can get through 6-8 games in an hour while a more "consistent" druid will play 2-3 games. Even if the Druid wins all 3 games, I would've had the chance to win 3 games of my own and then some.
If you want ot rank up, go with Zoo, it's very quick and easy to play, and the only real counter to it is RNG.
6
http://www.liquidhearth.com/forum/hearthstone/456785-a-beginners-guide-to-hs-terms
- Control: Another well established deck already in Hearthstone. The control deck plans to survive and win out with a smaller number of more powerful threats in the late game. You are a Control Deck if you only play Ragnaros/Ysera/Lord Jaraxxus as win conditions and the rest of your game is just surviving until one of these big threats can win the game for you. In the beginning of Hearthstone there was a bit of confusion surrounding this archetype as it was often confused with the next category.
- Midrange: Many of the decks which get classified as "Control Decks" are actually Midrange. To be fair, the line is not hard and fast; however, there are still some distinctions to be drawn. A midrange deck is characterized by trying to gain incremental value on every play: a prime example would be Argent Commander or the buffing creatures. If your deck is built to play solidly throughout the game and bury your opponent in incremental advantage, you have a Midrange deck. The defining aspect of a Midrange deck is that it has to play Control vs. Aggro and Aggro vs. Control if it wants to be successful.
- Combo: This is the hardest category to build because true combos are hard to find as game designers usually kill them before the game launches. Hunter OTK is the best known Combo Deck we have had to date. Hunter OTK is the less frustrating of the two true Combo branches: interactive and non-interactive. Non-interactive combo is something I would be surprised to ever see in Hearthstone but -- in the interest of fully covering the topic -- it would be described as "do x+y+z and you win the game." It may seem like Hunter OTK is like this, but since your opponent does actually have ways to stop you if they set up for your big turn, it is still an interactive combo: Taunts or Ice Block for example usually prevent this combo from winning outright.
- Aggro-control: This is an archetype more possible in Hearthstone than Magic because of how combat interactions work. An Aggro-control deck will revolve around smaller threats but locking your opponent out quickly. These decks will be slower than pure aggro, but will have more game against a wider variety of decks. I can see weapon based classes fitting this role most easily: they can attack with creatures and control the board with their weapons. Most of the decks being classified as “Board Control” are variations on the Aggro-control theme: their goal is to control the board and lock out the opponent while getting progressively better trades.
- Tempo: Tempo is one of the hardest archetypes to build. Tempo is a non-conventional archetype in that it mostly does away with Card Advantage. The goal of Tempo is to get one or two fast threats out -- Mana Wyrm being the perfect example -- and then prevent your opponent stopping it for the rest of the game. Tempo cards are often things like Freezing Trap or Frost Nova, these cards will never gain Card Advantage, but if you only need to buy yourMana Wyrm an extra turn or two then it’s fine. The ideal form of a Tempo Deck would be composed of creatures Mana Wyrm/Faerie Dragon/King Mukla and then be filled with spells like Sap/Counterspell/Conceal/or Frost Nova.
http://www.liquidhearth.com/forum/hearthstone/456785-a-beginners-guide-to-hs-terms
0
Your turn two was weak. The fact he dropped abusive sargeant on turn two instead of two minions was the key moment in that match. You needed to coin out your Harvest Golem that turn instead of hero power.
with experience, you will gain your chances.
0
missing all three? I think your biggest stopper is the preps