It's better than before. Not saying I'm the best battlegrounds player but it was a huge bummer getting like 20 mmr points for winning. If they define top 4 as a win, then the mmr should reflect that, and so should getting below top 4. I love this update.
I suspect you only played two games, you won the first one and lost the second one.
The reason you got only 17 because the mmr changes will come into effect from the second game on wards after the patch, i.e in the first game, old mmr system will work.
Here's the quote from Mike Donais
The MMR change takes 1 full game to take effect so the first game it will use the old numbers.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Earn 17 mr for second place.
Loose 53 mr for 5 place.
So balanced. :V
I don't understand why people care about the mmr. Is there something I'm missing?
(deleted)
edit: oh its a patch, checking...
It's better than before. Not saying I'm the best battlegrounds player but it was a huge bummer getting like 20 mmr points for winning. If they define top 4 as a win, then the mmr should reflect that, and so should getting below top 4. I love this update.
Pretty sure it depends on who you're playing against... I've lost "-4 Rating" on a fourth place... which is supposed to be a "win"
-DadamE
Yes, these are very dissapointing changes.
by by my 5600 ...
EDIT: YEAH! It just the 1st game was on old mmr, now it stabilized.
I suspect you only played two games, you won the first one and lost the second one.
The reason you got only 17 because the mmr changes will come into effect from the second game on wards after the patch, i.e in the first game, old mmr system will work.
Here's the quote from Mike Donais