What about the other two most popular Hunter decks, Secret and Midrange Hunter ? 2nd and 3rd most played deck in the meta. Why are you ignoring these two decks ?
Because cherry picking statistics to support his nonsensical claim is all he's capable of.
What about the other two most popular Hunter decks, Secret and Midrange Hunter ? 2nd and 3rd most played deck in the meta. Why are you ignoring these two decks ?
Yes, if you pick a hunter deck that is hardly played, then Odd Paladin might be a better choice. Oh dear....
Yes, if you pick a hunter deck that is hardly played, then Odd Paladin might be a better choice. Oh dear....
2nd and 3rd most played deck in the GAME is not "hard played".
THANK YOU!
So we're back to this point then. Finally!
I always aim to be thorough, so let's go with your altered version of the stats and double check. And we will use the link provided in Atrementar's comment as you ssuggest.
Odd Paladin stats against the top 3 win rate Hunter decks (attached): - Best winrate: 70.6% - Overall winrate against those top three decks combined : 65.5% winrate
Odd Quest Warrior stats against the top 3 win rate Hunter decks (attached): - Best winrate: 87.4% - Overall winrate against those top three decks combined : 68.1%
So..... I think that pretty much settles that one. But I'm sure you'll try and argue it some more. ^_^
It looks like we can put this one to bed. Thanks goodness! That was getting dull!
Because cherry picking statistics to support his nonsensical claim is all he's capable of.
This guy doesn't know when he's beat! Haha!
What do you mean mister thorough? You didn't even respond to my previous post :(
You quoted my response in your complaint that I didn't respond.
Thank you for further showing everyone here just how daft you are.
I responded to you more than once :). Check page 3 again, sweetie.
See, now you're just being plain argumentative for the sake of it. I'm not biting. You appear to have nothing useful left to say. (not that you ever did. Your first comment on here was just to be an insulting douchebag after all, rather than make an actual point). Then when you got called out on it by multiple people, you got butt hurt and started arguing with everyone. I don't see any point in pandering to your insecure need for attention any more. Bye now.
Yes, if you pick a hunter deck that is hardly played, then Odd Paladin might be a better choice. Oh dear....
2nd and 3rd most played deck in the GAME is not "hard played".
THANK YOU!
So we're back to this point then. Finally!
I always aim to be thorough, so let's go with your altered version of the stats and double check. And we will use the link provided in Atrementar's comment as you ssuggest.
Odd Paladin stats against the top 3 win rate Hunter decks (attached): - Best winrate: 70.6% - Overall winrate against those top three decks combined : 65.5% winrate
Odd Quest Warrior stats against the top 3 win rate Hunter decks (attached): - Best winrate: 87.4% - Overall winrate against those top three decks combined : 68.1%
So..... I think that pretty much settles that one. But I'm sure you'll try and argue it some more. ^_^
It looks like we can put this one to bed. Thanks goodness! That was getting dull!
That still wrong. You considered Odd Hunter, Spell Hunter and Midrange Hunter for Warrior and Odd Hunter, Deathrattle Hunter and Recruit Hunter for Paladin.
You picked different decks for Warrior and Paladin to support your stance that's cherry picking.
You told me to not consider Hunter decks less popular than Deathrattle Hunter yet you picked Deathrattle Hunter, Recruit Hunter and Odd Hunter that's cherry picking.
Here's the images from your attachment :
See, now you're just being plain argumentative for the sake of it. I'm not biting. You appear to have nothing useful left to say. (not that you ever did. Your first comment on here was just to be an insulting douchebag after all, rather than make an actual point). Then when you got called out on it by multiple people, you got butt hurt and started arguing with everyone. I don't see any point in pandering to your insecure need for attention any more. Bye now.
And meanwhile there's at least three users in this thread who called you out for your bullcrap, yet you're still going too, daft as ever. Something about a pot and a kettle, can't quite put my finger on it...
I'll have to admit though, yours is a creative way of saying "I can't respond to #49 because I have no valid points". I'll keep that one in mind.
I had good success with Secrets Hunter since the release of the expansion, but that deck becomes sooo booooring over time and stopped using it. Now I play homebrew Hooktusk pirate rogue and it counters many "meta" decks and it is also real fun to play. I have huge problem with aggro with that deck, but overall it's something fresh, fun and it is also good for laddering(yesterday climbed 3 ranks with it to rank 16, 5 stars)
See, now you're just being plain argumentative for the sake of it. I'm not biting. You appear to have nothing useful left to say. (not that you ever did. Your first comment on here was just to be an insulting douchebag after all, rather than make an actual point). Then when you got called out on it by multiple people, you got butt hurt and started arguing with everyone. I don't see any point in pandering to your insecure need for attention any more. Bye now.
And meanwhile there's at least three users in this thread who called you out for your bullcrap, yet you're still going too, daft as ever. Something about a pot and a kettle, can't quite put my finger on it...
I'll have to admit though, yours is a creative way of saying "I can't respond to #49 because I have no valid points". I'll keep that one in mind.
See, now you're just being plain argumentative for the sake of it. I'm not biting. You appear to have nothing useful left to say. (not that you ever did. Your first comment on here was just to be an insulting douchebag after all, rather than make an actual point). Then when you got called out on it by multiple people, you got butt hurt and started arguing with everyone. I don't see any point in pandering to your insecure need for attention any more. Bye now.
And meanwhile there's at least three users in this thread who called you out for your bullcrap, yet you're still going too, daft as ever. Something about a pot and a kettle, can't quite put my finger on it...
I'll have to admit though, yours is a creative way of saying "I can't respond to #49 because I have no valid points". I'll keep that one in mind.
Yeah, keep digging kid. Lol
And yet it seems to be only you and C_a_w who appear to be having a problem understanding simple statistics. Your mental arithmetic that led you to believe that "you and him makes 3" explains everything. XD
Also, being called out for "bullcrap" usually requires said bullcrap to have existed nthe first place. You're just acting butthurt because the statistics proved you wrong multiple times and you can't handle it, in true snowflake fashion. Sigh. Another one for the list...
And meanwhile there's at least three users in this thread who called you out for your bullcrap, yet you're still going too, daft as ever. Something about a pot and a kettle, can't quite put my finger on it...
I'll have to admit though, yours is a creative way of saying "I can't respond to #49 because I have no valid points". I'll keep that one in mind.
Yeah, keep digging kid. Lol And yet it seems to be only you and C_a_w who appear to be having a problem understanding simple statistics. Your mental arithmetic that led you to believe that "you and him makes 3" explains everything. XD
Also, being called out for "bullcrap" usually requires said bullcrap to have existed nthe first place. You're just acting butthurt because the statistics proved you wrong multiple times and you can't handle it, in true snowflake fashion. Sigh. Another one for the list...
And then we add Atramentar's post which I've referred to numerous times already which you keep on (partially) ignoring and we're at 3. Man counting sure is hard :)
We've been over your bullcrap, to the point where you're backed so far into a corner that you decided to ignore it instead, how mature. Great job on the "I don't see any point in pandering to your insecure need for attention any more." part though. Looks like self control is another thing you lack :)
Good riddance.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Because cherry picking statistics to support his nonsensical claim is all he's capable of.
Sigh.... lol
Yes, if you pick a hunter deck that is hardly played, then Odd Paladin might be a better choice.
Oh dear....
This guy doesn't know when he's beat! Haha!
Made it to Legend yesterday with Odd Mage with 80+ WR in about 35 games. Deck just wins against the popular Hunter decks. :-)
2nd and 3rd most played deck in the GAME is not "hard played".
What do you mean mister thorough? You didn't even respond to my previous post :(
You quoted my response in your complaint that I didn't respond.
Thank you for further showing everyone here just how daft you are.
I responded to you more than once :). Check page 3 again, sweetie.
See, now you're just being plain argumentative for the sake of it. I'm not biting.
You appear to have nothing useful left to say. (not that you ever did. Your first comment on here was just to be an insulting douchebag after all, rather than make an actual point). Then when you got called out on it by multiple people, you got butt hurt and started arguing with everyone. I don't see any point in pandering to your insecure need for attention any more.
Bye now.
And meanwhile there's at least three users in this thread who called you out for your bullcrap, yet you're still going too, daft as ever. Something about a pot and a kettle, can't quite put my finger on it...
I'll have to admit though, yours is a creative way of saying "I can't respond to #49 because I have no valid points". I'll keep that one in mind.
I had good success with Secrets Hunter since the release of the expansion, but that deck becomes sooo booooring over time and stopped using it. Now I play homebrew Hooktusk pirate rogue and it counters many "meta" decks and it is also real fun to play. I have huge problem with aggro with that deck, but overall it's something fresh, fun and it is also good for laddering(yesterday climbed 3 ranks with it to rank 16, 5 stars)
Too much of ego, too little of brain.
Yeah, keep digging kid. Lol
And yet it seems to be only you and C_a_w who appear to be having a problem understanding simple statistics. Your mental arithmetic that led you to believe that "you and him makes 3" explains everything. XD
Also, being called out for "bullcrap" usually requires said bullcrap to have existed nthe first place. You're just acting butthurt because the statistics proved you wrong multiple times and you can't handle it, in true snowflake fashion. Sigh. Another one for the list...
Anyway, arguing with children only gets you childish responses, it seems.
The ignore button is perfect for these situations. :-)
And then we add Atramentar's post which I've referred to numerous times already which you keep on (partially) ignoring and we're at 3. Man counting sure is hard :)
We've been over your bullcrap, to the point where you're backed so far into a corner that you decided to ignore it instead, how mature. Great job on the "I don't see any point in pandering to your insecure need for attention any more." part though. Looks like self control is another thing you lack :)
Good riddance.