When a player first comes across Hearthstone on their mobile device (or preferably on a Windows desktop), they are greeted with a welcoming message that the game is "insanely fun". As an expert player, I caution the new player to understand that how fun Hearthstone is depends on them. They must approach the game with two very important fundamentals in place:
1) You will lose some games regardless of any decision you make.
2) You will win some games regardless of any decision you make.
If a new player wishes to have fun playing Hearthstone, he or she must also avoid certain dialogue that can be seen on various forums. It is vital to keep in mind that information is skewed. This current meta for example, has already invited the suggestion of having "more viable" decks than the last. Do not take such drivel at face value. Instead, take note of the types of decks you have faced after 100 games. Look deeper into the number of options every player has for deck creation. Ask yourself how diverse this meta is and draw the inevitable conclusion that it really isn't. I cannot do this for you. It is up to each player to find out for him or herself.
Another step in the right direction is to not fall into the skill/no skill argument when dealing with the discussion of constructed decks. As I have documented before, Rogue is the only class where skill comes into play. Every other class falls into the no skill trap and what you choose to play is up to you. Make the best out of it and do not dwell on how intelligent the game could or should be.
Most importantly, avoid any meaningless debate contrary to my conviction. I stand by it as my goal is not to help myself but to help others. With over 10,000 wins, I have the experience to provide valuable information. I am dependable. IamCorrect.
It's not fun if you netdeck and ladder. For me, anyways. it's also not fun if you lose every round. Gotta find the middle ground and run decks that you actually enjoy.
Wow, Rogue is the only class that requires skill? You obviously do not know what you are talking about. Try to play around entomb as a N'Zoth Paladin. Try to have a 93% winrate in the pirate warrior mirror when your deck isn't not teched for it. Try to know when it is the right time to use burn on minions with freeze mage. Try to correctly spot 5 or 6 turn lethals.
When a player first comes across Hearthstone on their mobile device (or preferably on a Windows desktop), they are greeted with a welcoming message that the game is "insanely fun". As an expert player, I caution the new player to understand that how fun Hearthstone is depends on them. They must approach the game with two very important fundamentals in place:
1) You will lose some games regardless of any decision you make.
2) You will win some games regardless of any decision you make.
If a new player wishes to have fun playing Hearthstone, he or she must also avoid certain dialogue that can be seen on various forums. It is vital to keep in mind that information is skewed. This current meta for example, has already invited the suggestion of having "more viable" decks than the last. Do not take such drivel at face value. Instead, take note of the types of decks you have faced after 100 games. Look deeper into the number of options every player has for deck creation. Ask yourself how diverse this meta is and draw the inevitable conclusion that it really isn't. I cannot do this for you. It is up to each player to find out for him or herself.
Another step in the right direction is to not fall into the skill/no skill argument when dealing with the discussion of constructed decks. As I have documented before, Rogue is the only class where skill comes into play. Every other class falls into the no skill trap and what you choose to play is up to you. Make the best out of it and do not dwell on how intelligent the game could or should be.
Most importantly, avoid any meaningless debate contrary to my conviction. I stand by it as my goal is not to help myself but to help others. With over 10,000 wins, I have the experience to provide valuable information. I am dependable. IamCorrect.
Many things you have said are untrue. This is a very diverse meta (at least better than MSoG meta). Also, rogue being the only skill-based class my ass. Rogue does require skill... if it is plant rogue (quest rogue not so much). basically any control deck requires skill and sorry to tell you, but rogue isn't the only control class. Your last section is completely arrogant. I feel like I have to nitpick your comment because of the absolutely stupid things you said. However, what you said at the beginning is true.
When a player first comes across Hearthstone on their mobile device (or preferably on a Windows desktop), they are greeted with a welcoming message that the game is "insanely fun". As an expert player, I caution the new player to understand that how fun Hearthstone is depends on them. They must approach the game with two very important fundamentals in place:
1) You will lose some games regardless of any decision you make.
2) You will win some games regardless of any decision you make.
If a new player wishes to have fun playing Hearthstone, he or she must also avoid certain dialogue that can be seen on various forums. It is vital to keep in mind that information is skewed. This current meta for example, has already invited the suggestion of having "more viable" decks than the last. Do not take such drivel at face value. Instead, take note of the types of decks you have faced after 100 games. Look deeper into the number of options every player has for deck creation. Ask yourself how diverse this meta is and draw the inevitable conclusion that it really isn't. I cannot do this for you. It is up to each player to find out for him or herself.
Another step in the right direction is to not fall into the skill/no skill argument when dealing with the discussion of constructed decks. As I have documented before, Rogue is the only class where skill comes into play. Every other class falls into the no skill trap and what you choose to play is up to you. Make the best out of it and do not dwell on how intelligent the game could or should be.
Most importantly, avoid any meaningless debate contrary to my conviction. I stand by it as my goal is not to help myself but to help others. With over 10,000 wins, I have the experience to provide valuable information. I am dependable. IamCorrect.
Edit: I am an idiot, and cannot comprehend sarcasm. Ignore this post
Here's my original post if you want to die of cringe:
Wow, an arrogant person, just like me! It's like looking in a mirror! Let's see here:
"As an expert player", "With over 10, 000". Yup, indulging into self-proclaimed "I am the best" strategy! With no proof whatsoever! Niiiice! I am too a virtuoso in Hearthstone. I too am the greatest man on earth. Noone can tell me otherwise, because of my fragile ego!
"It's important that information is skewed." And by information, I mean everyone else's because I am ALWAYS correct.
"suggestion of "more viable" decks than the last" That's right my good man. Let's put ALL the anecdotal information we have obtained through precise examinations with such complex scientific instruments (such as the eye and erm...the brain!). Let us ignore the meta snapshots! What's the point of them anyways! It's not like they are made to examine the meta, and it's not like they all say that this meta is more diverse than the last!..wait a minute, it does? FAKE NEWS!
"Rogue is the only class where skill comes into play." Because once again, my favorite classes surely must be the most skilled! I mean look at Crystal Rogue!
"avoid any meaningless debate contrary to my conviction". Indeed, because that's how meaningful conclusions and ideas are perpetuated: absolute confirmity with only one perspective. Yup, you and me buddy. All our opinions are facts! Everyone else's is a lie; they do not have the superior amount of intelligence we have! We must only agree with our own point of view because I can't accept other people's thoughts and learn why they came to that conclusion!
Behold my swavy name. Look at it! Cogito_Ergo_Sum! Clearly, my name boasts a more superior mindset more than your own! Isn't that right IamCorrect! And our vocabulary! You cannot fathom our incontrovertible aptitude of utilizing a 'Thesaurus" and maneuvering a "Google" searching device! Our pretentiousness potency is immeasurable!
"I stand by it as my goal to not to help myself but to help others" Same here! I AM HUMBLE SEE?! I WANT TO HELP PEOPLE. NOTHING ELSE. WHAT?! IF I'M SO HUMBLE, THEN WHY DO I HAVE TO SAY IT?! YOU ASININE FOOL! YOU ARE JEALOUS OR TOO IDIOTIC TO RECOGNIZE MY ORATORY! YOU DO NOT COMPREHEND THE SHEER INGENIOUS WORKINGS OF MY MIND. AHAHAHAHAHAHA! Help me.
Today in my free brawl pack I got Barongeddon, then I had a cup of fresh green tea. As a result of that, I think Priest is OP because my keyboard is not a mechanical one. I hope Blizzard will address this issue.
When a player first comes across Hearthstone on their mobile device (or preferably on a Windows desktop), they are greeted with a welcoming message that the game is "insanely fun". As an expert player, I caution the new player to understand that how fun Hearthstone is depends on them. They must approach the game with two very important fundamentals in place:
1) You will lose some games regardless of any decision you make.
2) You will win some games regardless of any decision you make.
If a new player wishes to have fun playing Hearthstone, he or she must also avoid certain dialogue that can be seen on various forums. It is vital to keep in mind that information is skewed. This current meta for example, has already invited the suggestion of having "more viable" decks than the last. Do not take such drivel at face value. Instead, take note of the types of decks you have faced after 100 games. Look deeper into the number of options every player has for deck creation. Ask yourself how diverse this meta is and draw the inevitable conclusion that it really isn't. I cannot do this for you. It is up to each player to find out for him or herself.
Another step in the right direction is to not fall into the skill/no skill argument when dealing with the discussion of constructed decks. As I have documented before, Rogue is the only class where skill comes into play. Every other class falls into the no skill trap and what you choose to play is up to you. This sentence was randomly inserted into the quote, to see if anyone notices. Make the best out of it and do not dwell on how intelligent the game could or should be.
Most importantly, avoid any meaningless debate contrary to my conviction. I stand by it as my goal is not to help myself but to help others. With over 10,000,000 wins, I have the experience to provide valuable information. I am dependable. IamCorrect.
I gotta say, I love reading your posts. I like how it seems to start off as a salt post, but then slowly it becomes more and more clear that it's actually just satire... Well played, well played indeed.
Today in my free brawl pack I got Barongeddon, then I had a cup of fresh green tea. As a result of that, I think Priest is OP because my keyboard is not a mechanical one. I hope Blizzard will address this issue.
When a player first comes across Hearthstone on their mobile device (or preferably on a Windows desktop), they are greeted with a welcoming message that the game is "insanely fun". As an expert player, I caution the new player to understand that how fun Hearthstone is depends on them. They must approach the game with two very important fundamentals in place:
1) You will lose some games regardless of any decision you make.
2) You will win some games regardless of any decision you make.
If a new player wishes to have fun playing Hearthstone, he or she must also avoid certain dialogue that can be seen on various forums. It is vital to keep in mind that information is skewed. This current meta for example, has already invited the suggestion of having "more viable" decks than the last. Do not take such drivel at face value. Instead, take note of the types of decks you have faced after 100 games. Look deeper into the number of options every player has for deck creation. Ask yourself how diverse this meta is and draw the inevitable conclusion that it really isn't. I cannot do this for you. It is up to each player to find out for him or herself.
Another step in the right direction is to not fall into the skill/no skill argument when dealing with the discussion of constructed decks. As I have documented before, Rogue is the only class where skill comes into play. Every other class falls into the no skill trap and what you choose to play is up to you. Make the best out of it and do not dwell on how intelligent the game could or should be.
Most importantly, avoid any meaningless debate contrary to my conviction. I stand by it as my goal is not to help myself but to help others. With over 10,000 wins, I have the experience to provide valuable information. I am dependable. IamCorrect.
It's not fun if you netdeck and ladder. For me, anyways. it's also not fun if you lose every round. Gotta find the middle ground and run decks that you actually enjoy.
Wow, Rogue is the only class that requires skill? You obviously do not know what you are talking about. Try to play around entomb as a N'Zoth Paladin. Try to have a 93% winrate in the pirate warrior mirror when your deck isn't not teched for it. Try to know when it is the right time to use burn on minions with freeze mage. Try to correctly spot 5 or 6 turn lethals.
Or you can play Crystal Rogue.
Check out my fun evolve decks
Evolve C'thun: http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/743008-evolve-cthun
Evolve Jade: http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/753851-evolve-jade
Evolve Elemental: http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/813707-evolve-elemental
Free to try and find a game, dealing cards for sorrow, cards for pain.
You should change your name to 'IamRetarded'.
because of my fragile ego!anecdotalinformation we have obtained through precise examinations with such complex scientific instruments (such as the eye and erm...the brain!). Let us ignore the meta snapshots! What's the point of them anyways! It's not like they are made to examine the meta, and it's not like they all say that this meta is more diverse than the last!..wait a minute, it does? FAKE NEWS!because I can't accept other people's thoughts and learn why they came to that conclusion!pretentiousnesspotency is immeasurable!Help me.Very nice! I love comments like this!
iamcorrect posts are the best comedy content on this site
Vvreeeew.
Started tilting until the obvious signs started showing up
Well played sir, you get a slight smirk from me
Ugh, double post. Nothing to see here.
#gNOmeferatu
#gNOmeferatu
semi logos trolling... the best kind of trolling
Judging by the first few replies, sarcasm doesn't seem to be a strong-point for users on this site. Duly noted.
OP, I enjoyed your post.