I'm curious to see the community's perception about the new Druid epic card, Ultimate Infestation.
A. Do you think it's too strong?
B. Do you think it needs to be nerfed?
C. If yes, how?
Pro tip: there's a poll option when you're creating a thread on this site. Use it, MF.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
This disclaimer Will cleanse any sense of innuendo or sarcasm From the comments that might actually make you think And will also insult your intelligence at the same time. So, if it sounds sarcastic, don't take it seriously. If it sounds dangerous, Do not try this at home or at all. And if it offends you, just don't read it.
I'm curious to see the community's perception about the new Druid epic card, Ultimate Infestation.
A. Do you think it's too strong?
B. Do you think it needs to be nerfed?
C. If yes, how?
No
No
N/A
Edit: meta defining and Nerf worthy are not the same thing.
That's how I voted.
Meta defining? Might be, give it time.
No, to everything else.
Sprint + Starfire + Shield Maiden =19 MANA
Ultimate Infestation = 10 MANA
Yes. It should be "choose 3 of 5 effects", 4 with fandral.
It's not meta defining in and of itself, there has to be a viable deck behind it for it to matter at all.
It's cancer, so it's meta defining.
This disclaimer
Will cleanse any sense of innuendo or sarcasm
From the comments that might actually make you think
And will also insult your intelligence at the same time.
So, if it sounds sarcastic, don't take it seriously.
If it sounds dangerous,
Do not try this at home or at all.
And if it offends you, just don't read it.
a.no
b.no
c.no
It's at the power level 10 cost cards should be. If you're spending a whole turn on one card it needs to make a big impact
http://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/card-discussion/200295-ultimate-infestation-should-be-nerfed
http://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/card-discussion/198490-new-druid-card-reveal-ultimate-infestation
http://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/card-discussion/200509-ultimate-infestation-impact