Yeah, I know another salt thread, right? Nope it isn´t. Those nerfs weren´t adressed to real problems as a lot of you mentioned. The real problem is neverending value and always able to swing and swarm boards. With recent uprise of Facehunters and after nerfs of shaman I decided to finally try some of old Control Dragon Warrior (my build, its not refined to 100%), yeah I reck hunters, its fun, but those shamans... always swarming board more than Zoolock while generating value trough lackeys... and yeah, Shudderwock after Galakrond... I have no words, I tried to plan for everything, I fatigued him, but lost anyway, I had a lot of luck, because of RNGesus giving me good cards, but he just swarmed board, he played so badly that he even traded his 2/1 which could attack my face into may minions and then summoned new ones with hero power and tried to attack my face... That deck is just brainless and only aggro can stop it sadly. I expect some salty comments, here is the match, I warn you it´s long... https://hsreplay.net/replay/YCuomPq7uXUpsu6eroZMoc
OK my bad, I wrote it calmly, so did you even watched the match? or just see salt and ignore it? hmm?
And no I didn't watch it, and I don't disagree with you that shaman is too strong. You just started saying "another salt thread? Nope!" When it literally was lol.
I played pure control warrior for the last two days when realised that the ladder is full of hunters. And yeah, shaman is bit unfavored for me even if I'm playing 2 plagues and 2 brawls for their endgame. But it's ok. CW always struggled against midrange board centric decks. And situation for warrior is not so bad, if im able to curve into Boom on t9-t10 without loosing board it's mostly a win for me
OK my bad, I wrote it calmly, so did you even watched the match? or just see salt and ignore it? hmm?
Ahh there it is. Normally the backpeddling comes later but it happened quickly this time around.
Are you going to contribute to the thread or no? You comments are almost as bad as pure salt comments. Anyways, I think Shaman will be pretty good vs control just because of the Galakran+Shudder Combo. Current Control decks can't seem to generate enough value at the moment.
I played pure control warrior for the last two days when realised that the ladder is full of hunters. And yeah, shaman is bit unfavored for me even if I'm playing 2 plagues and 2 brawls for their endgame. But it's ok. CW always struggled against midrange board centric decks. And situation for warrior is not so bad, if im able to curve into Boom on t9-t10 without loosing board it's mostly a win for me
This is absolutely correct. I think boom is slept on tbh. If you can pull boom off against shaman and not be dead immediately after, you 100% crush them. Your value and board control far exceeds theres if you can stabilize as boom.
I played pure control warrior for the last two days when realised that the ladder is full of hunters. And yeah, shaman is bit unfavored for me even if I'm playing 2 plagues and 2 brawls for their endgame. But it's ok. CW always struggled against midrange board centric decks. And situation for warrior is not so bad, if im able to curve into Boom on t9-t10 without loosing board it's mostly a win for me
Thanks, I´ll try Boom in it, I don´t play him because there is no mech synergies in my deck, maybe mech CW could perfom better than Dragon CW against Shamans
OK my bad, I wrote it calmly, so did you even watched the match? or just see salt and ignore it? hmm?
Ahh there it is. Normally the backpeddling comes later but it happened quickly this time around.
Are you going to contribute to the thread or no? You comments are almost as bad as pure salt comments. Anyways, I think Shaman will be pretty good vs control just because of the Galakran+Shudder Combo. Current Control decks can't seem to generate enough value at the moment.
What point is contributing to a thread that's a carbon copy of 1000 other threads? Why flood hearthpwn with even more trash that's already there? You could close your eyes and click a random thread and it would be about shaman. Any discussion on it has already been had or is already taking place. The only reason people make new threads about it is so they can easily be heard, rather than their ideas being buried in comments. We don't need more threads about shaman, we have a billion of them, and most also all agree.
You'll respond with "well just move on or ignore it." It's more entertaining to point out the stupidity of the redundancy. They obviously have time to beat a dead horse so why not make the time to defend the corpse?
OK my bad, I wrote it calmly, so did you even watched the match? or just see salt and ignore it? hmm?
Ahh there it is. Normally the backpeddling comes later but it happened quickly this time around.
Are you going to contribute to the thread or no? You comments are almost as bad as pure salt comments. Anyways, I think Shaman will be pretty good vs control just because of the Galakran+Shudder Combo. Current Control decks can't seem to generate enough value at the moment.
Yep, that´s the thing I´m trying to talk about, while Galakrond Shaman is perfect midrange deck it also generates almost as same value as greedy decks while mantining perfect tempo/comebacks.
I played pure control warrior for the last two days when realised that the ladder is full of hunters. And yeah, shaman is bit unfavored for me even if I'm playing 2 plagues and 2 brawls for their endgame. But it's ok. CW always struggled against midrange board centric decks. And situation for warrior is not so bad, if im able to curve into Boom on t9-t10 without loosing board it's mostly a win for me
Thanks, I´ll try Boom in it, I don´t play him because there is no mech synergies in my deck, maybe mech CW could perfom better than Dragon CW against Shamans
You could probably stay dragons And get away with just putting boom and omega assembly in. Omega is never terrible and is just op on 10.
I played pure control warrior for the last two days when realised that the ladder is full of hunters. And yeah, shaman is bit unfavored for me even if I'm playing 2 plagues and 2 brawls for their endgame. But it's ok. CW always struggled against midrange board centric decks. And situation for warrior is not so bad, if im able to curve into Boom on t9-t10 without loosing board it's mostly a win for me
Thanks, I´ll try Boom in it, I don´t play him because there is no mech synergies in my deck, maybe mech CW could perfom better than Dragon CW against Shamans
You could probably stay dragons And get away with just putting boom and omega assembly in. Omega is never terrible and is just op on 10.
I´ll stay with Dragons, I switched some cards for Dragonmaw Scorchers to deal with Shamans 2/1s and aggro and to activate Plague of Wrath while having a minion in play
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Yeah, I know another salt thread, right? Nope it isn´t. Those nerfs weren´t adressed to real problems as a lot of you mentioned. The real problem is neverending value and always able to swing and swarm boards. With recent uprise of Facehunters and after nerfs of shaman I decided to finally try some of old Control Dragon Warrior (my build, its not refined to 100%), yeah I reck hunters, its fun, but those shamans... always swarming board more than Zoolock while generating value trough lackeys... and yeah, Shudderwock after Galakrond... I have no words, I tried to plan for everything, I fatigued him, but lost anyway, I had a lot of luck, because of RNGesus giving me good cards, but he just swarmed board, he played so badly that he even traded his 2/1 which could attack my face into may minions and then summoned new ones with hero power and tried to attack my face... That deck is just brainless and only aggro can stop it sadly. I expect some salty comments, here is the match, I warn you it´s long... https://hsreplay.net/replay/YCuomPq7uXUpsu6eroZMoc
This is literally the definition of a salt thread lol
This is literally definition of a salt comment lol
Difference is I wasn't claiming it wasn't salt, as you did at the very beginning of your post. Womp womp.
It seems you really don't know what "salt" means...
Also Rogue stomps it flat.
OK my bad, I wrote it calmly, so did you even watched the match? or just see salt and ignore it? hmm?
Let's just bust out the popcorn and watch the spewing of intelligence unfold before our very eyes. It's coming.
Ahh there it is. Normally the backpeddling comes later but it happened quickly this time around.
Have no problem to admit something wrong I did
And no I didn't watch it, and I don't disagree with you that shaman is too strong. You just started saying "another salt thread? Nope!" When it literally was lol.
Then you should have no problem admitting that the last thing hearthpwn needed was another thread about shaman.
I played pure control warrior for the last two days when realised that the ladder is full of hunters. And yeah, shaman is bit unfavored for me even if I'm playing 2 plagues and 2 brawls for their endgame. But it's ok. CW always struggled against midrange board centric decks. And situation for warrior is not so bad, if im able to curve into Boom on t9-t10 without loosing board it's mostly a win for me
Are you going to contribute to the thread or no? You comments are almost as bad as pure salt comments. Anyways, I think Shaman will be pretty good vs control just because of the Galakran+Shudder Combo. Current Control decks can't seem to generate enough value at the moment.
Hi my dood.
Why don´t you just ignore it then?
This is absolutely correct. I think boom is slept on tbh. If you can pull boom off against shaman and not be dead immediately after, you 100% crush them. Your value and board control far exceeds theres if you can stabilize as boom.
Thanks, I´ll try Boom in it, I don´t play him because there is no mech synergies in my deck, maybe mech CW could perfom better than Dragon CW against Shamans
What point is contributing to a thread that's a carbon copy of 1000 other threads? Why flood hearthpwn with even more trash that's already there? You could close your eyes and click a random thread and it would be about shaman. Any discussion on it has already been had or is already taking place. The only reason people make new threads about it is so they can easily be heard, rather than their ideas being buried in comments. We don't need more threads about shaman, we have a billion of them, and most also all agree.
You'll respond with "well just move on or ignore it." It's more entertaining to point out the stupidity of the redundancy. They obviously have time to beat a dead horse so why not make the time to defend the corpse?
Yep, that´s the thing I´m trying to talk about, while Galakrond Shaman is perfect midrange deck it also generates almost as same value as greedy decks while mantining perfect tempo/comebacks.
You could probably stay dragons And get away with just putting boom and omega assembly in. Omega is never terrible and is just op on 10.
I´ll stay with Dragons, I switched some cards for Dragonmaw Scorchers to deal with Shamans 2/1s and aggro and to activate Plague of Wrath while having a minion in play