Warrior still has way too much control, 4 aoe boardclear that are way to easy to pull off. no wonder everybody plays it.

What are you talking about? The top warrior deck has 36k plays. The top Paladin deck has 86k, Druid is 84k. Warrior has a decently high playrate but nowhere near the Tier 1 decks

and the clown comment goes too.. 

Battleworn Faceless up to 3 mana I kinda predicted felt like a obvious choice to reduce the combo potential of the deck, kinda surprised they touched Thori'belore though when they nerfed the combo potential they usally try to avoid Legendary nerfs as much as possible nerfing it a couple of months prior to rotation feels weird.

As far as Inquisitive Creation goes I don't see this nerf doing much at all its an extremly minor nerf if they wanted to poke the Mage abit they would need more.

The buff to Flint seems huge

Oh well, it's painful but I have to say goodbye to my poor golden Fate Splitter

Sludge on Wheels  buff is definitely not enough to make Warlock viable. He needs more Barrel of Sludge generators, not more stats... And DK got zero buffs. Have they abandoned him already?

No nerf to dragon Druid? Ok…..

This is just my own opinion but I really don't see a big problem with Dragon Druid. Its a cheap deck which is good for those with smaller collections its a pretty good deck but it got its weaknesses.

Yes it can have a really strong start but so can alot of other decks, there are decks that can have you almost dead at the end of turn 4 when they highroll. Not to mention 2/3 times when you face Druid its a Highlander based deck.

I'm more surprised we didnt see anything towards Paladin because during the last two weeks over 30% of my games has been against them. While Druid sits at a steady 8-9% and like said 2/3 times its Highlander not Dragon so the deck just doesnt check any boxes for being a problematic deck. It doesnt hold anything back and you don't really take them into consideration when building a deck either.

Dragon Druid has almost exactly the same playrate as Paladin my guy. 86k plays for aggro pally, 84k for Dragon Druid. And Dragon Druid is a 65% winrate deck.

It sounds like you're getting some weird rng, all variants of highlander druid have <15k plays. 

It is just your opinion.

I'm with you on this; the issue could be that it's a bit polarizing. There are decks that can't deal with the waves of buffed Dragon Golems, or even the multiple big dragons Druid can play late.

There are also decks that completely wreck it; triple blood DK usually has enough removal to hold the druid at bay, and some faster decks can kill them before the big threats get played. 

Losing to a polarizing deck like that can feel frustrating; that's the only reason a nerf wouldn't have been a shock. That said, it's healthy for the game to have a cheap deck or two that's not only playable, but actually competitive. 

so no Elemental Shaman buff ?

i guess Skarr, the Catastrophe is still unplayable

I won a game with Skarr recently.

Did Burrow Buster really need a buff? It consistently saw play.

I think it was just played to have enough excavate cards :)

Of course it was played for excavate, but it never felt "bad" to play it, as you were able to trade into relatively powerful enemy minions. In that, I mean that 4 health was acceptable as you were often expecting it to die in the trade anyways. It is an odd choice for a buff like that.

No it didn't. No one played excavate decks  unless they were actively throwing. And even though HS is full of idiots who want to lose, I don't think this really counts as "playing" .