Like now, for me it seems an ok card. Nothing too broken and you need to combo with something.
By the way, combo card in midrange and aggro we already know that are bad.
So this is not an aggro/midrange but this is a combo card maybe for also an OTK or nearly, we will see.
The Nameless One is a card for sure good. Always strong in every deck. (And I don't know if priest will play it since he has so many good cards)
Il'gynoth might be good, it might have or don't have a deck. We will see.
1
Nah, this deck is unstable af, reminds tip the scales paladin everyone was crying about last expansion, same for this rogue deck, it will disappear in a weak
1
It is there you called it obviously Brocken? I don’t see it because BP is not, I can only see people doing wrong disicions against BP or playing decks with low winrate against BP, and then blaming their countless loses on how this deck is op, it is but not as op as everyone said it is, this deck needs a nerf, yes, but there are other problems in wild that needs solution more than big priest, and fixing Barnes/res mechanic must be a part of a big nerf not the only one
1
Your arguments a subjective, my point was that big priest has weak points and turn 4 Barnes is not unwinnable. And the problem you mentioned can be rearranged against any deck “the problem is the fact that for example kingsbane rogue winrate skyrockets based solely on whetether they drew their raiding party and what they will topdeck after, also it fells awful to play against because no one likes to be pushed by the same weapon over and over again.”I can see your point, but I also can see that after Barnes/res will get their nerf everyone will find another wild deck and will cry about how unbalanced it is. I agree the Barnes problem do exist, but if team 5 will decide to fix it they should not only nerf Barnes, because he is not the only problem that plagues the wild meta
1
It is the problem of broken Aggro strategies, a problem of kingsbane rogues infinite weapon, Murlock paladin otk, and agro mages possibility to build a huge board on turn 4-5 and prevent an aoe with Counterspell, a problem of dragon iner fire priest otk you on turn 3 with 28/28 elemental, without big priest this decks won’t disappear
25
Why most of wild players are so salty of Barnes? I’m not a big priest player, but I think if blizzard will decide to fix Barnes they also need to fix voidcaller and molten giants both allows the same swing turns. But no one is complaining about cubelock turn 3 demon sense into turn 4 caller pact or pally turn 3 Thekal. And in game mode there such turns is not even considered a problem it’s fine to have card like Barnes
P.S. you can easily tech your deck agains priest ressumoning mechanic, so just please if you are writing about nerfs in wild alongside Barnes remind blizzard about thing from bellow, Kingsbane, voidcaller,Kabal crystal runner, potion of madness and lots of other cards that allows unfair swing turns
10
Op, 400 dust
5
I am playing wild, and since reaching rank 2 I haven’t met a single big priest...
Even when I met them I can say that turn 4 into Barnes is not that unwinnable as you all guys say it is. I won turn 4 Barnes on odd war, I’m always winning turn 4 Barnes on dragon priest thanks to potion of madness
P.S. the only class that struggles against big priest is warlock, everyone else do have ways of dealing with this deck, yeah turn 4 Barnes makes me feel salty, but than Aggro mages plays whole hand on turn 3 into turn 4 fireball lethal, or Kingsbane rogue buffs it’s weapon to 11 on turn 3, or pirate warrior who can make you consede on turn 2 already, all of this also makes me salty. Most of this strategies also exists for 2 years. Mine point is that you guys just need to stop being salty about a deck in a game mode which is MADE OF decks that makes everyone salty, and big priest is at least compared to some others is winnable with his “gold fish” and IS interesting to play