there is too much cancer shit in this game nerfing silence was the most ******** thing they could do spellbreaker at least never got nerfed and its the only viable neutral silence.
agree, that's the main reason why it should not be HoFamed
Basic 2013: my first deck, a good old good big drood with Ysera, Ragnaros & Alextrasza that became my first golden hero...a smorc death rattle hunter, a funny mech mage.
I played aggro pally in december, up to rank 4. Stuck to 12 in January. Now what I like of this deck is the surprise effect...3 games, 3 concedes and a nice little extra star. Will keep you posted.
If you ask a sales person in a shop what's the best seller, they will probably answer it something they've sold a lot in the past 3 days, ex. umbrellas during the 3 single days of rain in the sahara desert ... I hated pirate warrior, always killing me at turn 5...
Oh gosh, I am so jealous!...maybe you have a super calculator in your head, or play chess blind, or are the incredible instinctive geniuses...alas, there are poor human as me scumbag that need to think, calculate and maybe, you know, win a turn earlier?
I play currently a pure aggro pally, and honestly I don't think there is an aggro problem to solve, actually they should nerf the Cube IMHO (hehe).
I am an average F2P, hovering round rank 11. Most of the games I win against control decks (priests and locks) go well after turn 10 so the rule about playtime will not help. Of course I make many mistakes, and that does not help to close game faster than turn 7, however, what's the % of players above rank 5? Below 15 you have a lot of aggro, yes, but how boring fighting your way to rank 10th when you've been doing that for 4 years.... And why should I play a game where I am obliged to spend money to make expensive control decks, which I generally can afford only 1 month before each new expansion? And so I shard everything just to shard again my legendaries for the cheap blues on the next expansions...just to try and play them for a while...
And why I should wait 15 minutes to play ranked? Just because people having more money than me to spend in this game and love staring at a screen at level 19 do not have to make that extra effort to tech their deck with a couple of defile, dragon potion etc? Also, in that case, control decks would have to wait 15 minutes too...or make the game last longer on purpose in order not to wait...meta comes and goes, and now there is only one aggro deck, aggro pally with no Tirion, no silence no ooze. And that deck performs quite well, but there are so many control decks that it is difficult to win 3 games in a row. So yes, I have an amazing 56,3% win rate, unfortunately since they are not in a row I'm stuck at lvl 12/11...
Here are my stats in the past 3 days, EU server, if anyone is interested in talking about actual % and checking if your solutions would really solve the problem...or just generate more expensive, control decks and have F2P run away from HS.
I don't think i would want a Hearthstone universe where every game goes to turn 20 and takes 30 minutes...
The game used to be that way years ago. I preferred it, personally.
? did we play the same game? been there since first month, lots of face hunters and zoo, all my friends laughing because I insisted with my control drood...
I kind of agree with everybody on the maul: taunt no good, divine shield good, +attack wins some matches...I'll try now 1 maul for 1 silence and see. also the ooze.
I'm playing Zoo with 2x Spellbreakers in it. Lifesaver, helps to close out games.
what do you take out for spell breaker in an aggro pally?
I removed both mauls from the standard aggro pally list and put in two spellbreakers. Mauls I found were useless giving me TOO many times taunt and the spellbreakers are great against those voidlords.
0
funny all those rankings...
0
0
Why is everybody calling StrongFort47 OP?
Lost in meta-translation....
0
I feel there are not enough decks...they should have put each class and the best for each class
1
Sniff...so moved by re-playing an old big drood with Shade of Naxxramas, a really original Zoolock, facing a burn mage with Flame Juggler...
thinking about going back to Wild :-)
What about you?
0
Basic 2013: my first deck, a good old good big drood with Ysera, Ragnaros & Alextrasza that became my first golden hero...a smorc death rattle hunter, a funny mech mage.
I really liked yogg mage too. All fun decks.
0
loooove this deck
I played aggro pally in december, up to rank 4. Stuck to 12 in January. Now what I like of this deck is the surprise effect...3 games, 3 concedes and a nice little extra star. Will keep you posted.
0
If you ask a sales person in a shop what's the best seller, they will probably answer it something they've sold a lot in the past 3 days, ex. umbrellas during the 3 single days of rain in the sahara desert ... I hated pirate warrior, always killing me at turn 5...
3
Oh gosh, I am so jealous!...maybe you have a super calculator in your head, or play chess blind, or are the incredible instinctive geniuses...alas, there are poor human as me scumbag that need to think, calculate and maybe, you know, win a turn earlier?
Not all decks are smorc ;-)
sincerely yours,
Miss Scumbag
1
:-) looks more like a salty thread than a most heated deck poll
:-)
1
I play currently a pure aggro pally, and honestly I don't think there is an aggro problem to solve, actually they should nerf the Cube IMHO (hehe).
I am an average F2P, hovering round rank 11. Most of the games I win against control decks (priests and locks) go well after turn 10 so the rule about playtime will not help. Of course I make many mistakes, and that does not help to close game faster than turn 7, however, what's the % of players above rank 5? Below 15 you have a lot of aggro, yes, but how boring fighting your way to rank 10th when you've been doing that for 4 years.... And why should I play a game where I am obliged to spend money to make expensive control decks, which I generally can afford only 1 month before each new expansion? And so I shard everything just to shard again my legendaries for the cheap blues on the next expansions...just to try and play them for a while...
And why I should wait 15 minutes to play ranked? Just because people having more money than me to spend in this game and love staring at a screen at level 19 do not have to make that extra effort to tech their deck with a couple of defile, dragon potion etc? Also, in that case, control decks would have to wait 15 minutes too...or make the game last longer on purpose in order not to wait...meta comes and goes, and now there is only one aggro deck, aggro pally with no Tirion, no silence no ooze. And that deck performs quite well, but there are so many control decks that it is difficult to win 3 games in a row. So yes, I have an amazing 56,3% win rate, unfortunately since they are not in a row I'm stuck at lvl 12/11...
Here are my stats in the past 3 days, EU server, if anyone is interested in talking about actual % and checking if your solutions would really solve the problem...or just generate more expensive, control decks and have F2P run away from HS.
cheers to cheap aggro deck :-)
0
0
I kind of agree with everybody on the maul: taunt no good, divine shield good, +attack wins some matches...I'll try now 1 maul for 1 silence and see. also the ooze.
0
0