Loses hard to Taunt Druid and Priest most of the time, been playing the same deck before looking at this guide. I reached rank 5 a lot of times and sometimes even rank 2-3, so I'm not a ******** player. All i can say is, that this deck had it's prime phase. It's no longer an easy win most of the time like some weeks ago. Maybe I joined the Even Paladin bandwagon too late, but this deck doesnt seem that strong anymore, at least for me. After 20 games I had only 50% win rate and I don't think I made severe misplays (ofc I didn't play every matchup perfectly, but who does.)
Maybe you're right, but since the meta have a few droods and priests, it does not really matter...below my stats today, EU server
I don't see why you are calling names other players. Why calling hunters "brainless"? Your post started kind of properly, underling mechanics - even if you do not provide datas, analysis or references to any scientific statistics from either your own experience or other websites I won't even mention.
I used to play a big taunt drood at the beginning, that was quite unbeatable at the time till the nerf. Yes, I played "brainless" face hunter but never got the right tempo, control one with hyena, eagle, rhino was my favorite. Yes, I played zoo lock with small return, yes I played secret pally, yes I played Dr. boom and ragnaros with immense satisfaction when they went boom boom. Yes I played deathrattles funny meme decks and yes I played token droods, not so satisfying but got to rank 4 the one and only time. yes, I played C-thun. Yes I played tempo mage, yes I played quest rogue...yes I'm currently playing murloc pally and played dude pally last season. Yes I tried Agatha / Shudderwock for fun and shared all possible cards to try that, but it's such a weak deck, stuck at 15 for 2 weeks, gone back to good old murloc pally to get my pack per day and my 35 powders per day...All the above mentioned decks had counter mechanics (destroy 1 mana spell for jade droods) and that is just demonstrated by me having a super deck and opposite players having all the counters (of course on top of my mistakes). So I won't blame the mechanics, maybe I am such an ex-"brainless" hunter to even grasp mechanics, I just play for fun...what the hell, people actually do that, playing for fun...looks like this concept is quite mysterious to some salty posters.
Why net decking on "brainless" net decks? Because I'm ftp and sometimes "brainless" aggro decks are the cheapest - brilliant mechanics in tech decks from Einstein players all into theory have a simple problem: they need tons on gold spent on the strongest legendary, money that I am not willing to pay; most of them are control which is very interesting when you are a student so brilliant with a genius memory not requiring hours of study, jobless or having the pleasure of spending all your weekends on 25/30 minutes games. I just don't have the time, so I grind up with funny, cheap, aggro decks to shard enough and make 4/8 legendaries per expansion which allow me to try more interesting decks.
I play since the beginning, battle tag in the 2000-ish. I have never been a spectator of my own game, probably because I am not so good and in a sense yes, I have been a spectator of my own weaknesses laughing hard at the stupid mistakes I do make.
The only deck I spectated in these (5? 4 & 1/2? don't remember really) years is..
Yogg Saron!!!
Loved to spectate him going completely random crazy with spell of which I did not even know the existence. Booms, whoops, killing by own board, harakiri by massive card drawing, "I will hunt you down" threatenings, laughs...totally rng crazy and yet a totally fun spectator experience like watching a short funny movie with a suspense end.
With all due respect to a player insulting other players, this is not a poll and the post should be moved to salty - unless the word "brainless" is edited by the original starter of this otherwise interesting thread.
Thanks for the suggestion of Zola the Gorgon on Lifedrinker.I run the classic version with tar creeper, acolyte and engineer for cycling faster and zola + 1 less sand binder gives it more tempo, especially with Coin and Farsight on shudderwock or grumble
Aggro pala, Control lock, spiteful or control priest
I’m considering aggro paladin at the moment just wasn’t real sure
Tried Dude Paladin. I think I may have had the worst luck. Lost so many times to BS and shenanigans. I won a few games with equality, but otherwise you get so beat up quick that it's most the time just concede. Here's what would happen -
- get out valued on board and could never come back. (couldn't draw equality)
- no healing (just dead too quick)
- Big minion to deal with (can't expect to keep Tarim in opening hand, and if not you won't draw him or have a board when you do)
- If you keep Divine Favor, you almost always draw the second one before you can use it. If you discard it, you get it too late or never.
- mirror match, not much skill here, just card draw.
There isn't much skill in this deck. Only when you have knife juggler on board, then you just have to play/trade the board clear.
The only times you lose against this deck are when you don't have a board clear. Most decks play around 4 or more.
So in your opinion cubelock is the best deck? Even this shows me right, cubelock is not a good choice for best deck.
nope, I don't think cube lock is the best deck, just annoying. I was only curious to understand what for you were the other 11 decks better that cube lock...
0
I the zoo is a zoo, you're well dead before this card has a chance to be played
0
isn't it a 6 mana skulking Geist a bit late to counter 1 + poison seeds?
0
0
0
0
0
Class Stats
0
2
0
I don't see why you are calling names other players. Why calling hunters "brainless"? Your post started kind of properly, underling mechanics - even if you do not provide datas, analysis or references to any scientific statistics from either your own experience or other websites I won't even mention.
I used to play a big taunt drood at the beginning, that was quite unbeatable at the time till the nerf. Yes, I played "brainless" face hunter but never got the right tempo, control one with hyena, eagle, rhino was my favorite. Yes, I played zoo lock with small return, yes I played secret pally, yes I played Dr. boom and ragnaros with immense satisfaction when they went boom boom. Yes I played deathrattles funny meme decks and yes I played token droods, not so satisfying but got to rank 4 the one and only time. yes, I played C-thun. Yes I played tempo mage, yes I played quest rogue...yes I'm currently playing murloc pally and played dude pally last season. Yes I tried Agatha / Shudderwock for fun and shared all possible cards to try that, but it's such a weak deck, stuck at 15 for 2 weeks, gone back to good old murloc pally to get my pack per day and my 35 powders per day...All the above mentioned decks had counter mechanics (destroy 1 mana spell for jade droods) and that is just demonstrated by me having a super deck and opposite players having all the counters (of course on top of my mistakes). So I won't blame the mechanics, maybe I am such an ex-"brainless" hunter to even grasp mechanics, I just play for fun...what the hell, people actually do that, playing for fun...looks like this concept is quite mysterious to some salty posters.
Why net decking on "brainless" net decks? Because I'm ftp and sometimes "brainless" aggro decks are the cheapest - brilliant mechanics in tech decks from Einstein players all into theory have a simple problem: they need tons on gold spent on the strongest legendary, money that I am not willing to pay; most of them are control which is very interesting when you are a student so brilliant with a genius memory not requiring hours of study, jobless or having the pleasure of spending all your weekends on 25/30 minutes games. I just don't have the time, so I grind up with funny, cheap, aggro decks to shard enough and make 4/8 legendaries per expansion which allow me to try more interesting decks.
I play since the beginning, battle tag in the 2000-ish. I have never been a spectator of my own game, probably because I am not so good and in a sense yes, I have been a spectator of my own weaknesses laughing hard at the stupid mistakes I do make.
The only deck I spectated in these (5? 4 & 1/2? don't remember really) years is..
Yogg Saron!!!
Loved to spectate him going completely random crazy with spell of which I did not even know the existence. Booms, whoops, killing by own board, harakiri by massive card drawing, "I will hunt you down" threatenings, laughs...totally rng crazy and yet a totally fun spectator experience like watching a short funny movie with a suspense end.
With all due respect to a player insulting other players, this is not a poll and the post should be moved to salty - unless the word "brainless" is edited by the original starter of this otherwise interesting thread.
0
Thanks for the explanation, nice deck, don't have malfurion but the rich king replaces properly
1
for volcano & lightening storm + draw
1
Thanks for the suggestion of Zola the Gorgon on Lifedrinker.I run the classic version with tar creeper, acolyte and engineer for cycling faster and zola + 1 less sand binder gives it more tempo, especially with Coin and Farsight on shudderwock or grumble
0
0