Hearthpwn

Quote from bladestone >>

Very good deck.  Always a good sign when you win your first two games ever with the deck.  Quite easy to use.

Edit: 4 wins in a row

 

Sniff...so moved by re-playing an old big drood with Shade of Naxxramas, a really original Zoolock, facing a burn mage with Flame Juggler...

thinking about going back to Wild :-)

What about you?

Oh gosh, I am so jealous!...maybe you have a super calculator in your head, or play chess blind, or are the incredible instinctive geniuses...alas, there are poor human as me scumbag that need to think, calculate and maybe, you know, win a turn earlier?

Not all decks are smorc ;-)

sincerely yours,

Miss Scumbag

:-) looks more like a salty thread than a most heated deck poll

:-)

I play currently a pure aggro pally, and honestly I don't think there is an aggro problem to solve, actually they should nerf the  Cube IMHO (hehe).

I am an average F2P, hovering round rank 11. Most of the games I win against control decks (priests and locks)  go well after turn 10 so the rule about playtime will not help. Of course I make many mistakes, and that does not help to close game faster than turn 7, however, what's the % of players above rank 5? Below 15 you have a lot of aggro, yes, but how boring fighting your way to rank 10th when you've been doing that for 4 years.... And why should I play a game where I am obliged to spend money to make expensive control decks, which I generally can afford only 1 month before each new expansion? And so I shard everything just to shard again my legendaries for the cheap blues on the next expansions...just to try and play them for a while...

And why I should wait 15 minutes to play ranked? Just because people having more money than me to spend in this game and love staring at a screen at level 19 do not have to make that extra effort to tech their deck with a couple of defile, dragon potion etc? Also, in that case, control decks would have to wait 15 minutes too...or make the game last longer on purpose in order not to wait...meta comes and goes, and now there is only one aggro deck, aggro pally with no Tirion, no silence no ooze. And that deck performs quite well, but there are so many control decks that it is difficult to win 3 games in a row. So yes, I have an amazing 56,3% win rate, unfortunately since they are not in a row I'm stuck at lvl 12/11...

Here are my stats in the past 3 days, EU server, if anyone is interested in talking about actual % and checking if your solutions would really solve the problem...or just generate more expensive, control decks and have F2P run away from HS.

cheers to cheap aggro deck :-)

Quote from Soltarg >>

Quote from Soltarg >>

Quote from PRAISEYOGG42 >>

Is Soltrag the new Schrute?

 shrute?what does that mean?:)

 Before i hit,again, the report button on this guy,can someone explain me what did he mean with  the word "shrute"?Thank you.

Quote from KawsmikW >>

Quote from GratedWasabi >>

If you just want to hit Legend to see the symbol, no sense of satisfaction?

Play Smorc Paladin. Always play full curve and always go face. You'll hit legend by 7 or 8 hours of gameplay, guaranteed.

 I don't want to and i don't plan on it, but as i said on top, if i hit a wall of 200 priests in a row, and somebody barges in saying smorc pally is the greatest counter to priest, i'd have to be insane not to take it. But knowing my luck i switch to smorc pally and my next 10 games are against perfect counters to pally.

Lay on Hands

I do not see why many people concentrate on alternative design being worst than the original...The point is: the original sucks. Dot.

Devil is in the details. Blizzard is known for amazing graphics and this crystal is definitively not nice

Gratz Chakki!

Shaman hero power. There's precisely no reason why a hero power should ever be random. 

Fast decks have a lower skill floor, their goal of winning is more straightforward: getting the opponents health to 0, besides that they are generally better to grind with. Winning more games means laddering faster.

Quote from NightCrawl3r >>

Quote from RavenSunHP >>

If a Priest plays a stolen Hydrologist, what secrets can he discover?

HS Spider answers: Priests will discover paladin secrets from hydrologist. Classes with secrets will discover secrets from their class, otherwise they will discover paladin secrets

Well yes and no.

There is no need for Cubelock and all its dust to get good results both in constructed and casual.

New players are poorly supported while the game has settled around the double class legendary per expansion. And this should change, ie the collection curve should be much faster early on (and bundles are completely insufficient and unreliable).

But new players cannot expect to start already on par with the same resources as veterans.

Quote from Xel562 >>

This card is made for Treat Druid. It has insane synergy with Living Mana and the new "giant" Mulchmuncher.

Not only do you get temporary mana to activate into future permanent ones with living mana but you also get to discount the muncher super fast thanks to this and maybe cast two in one turn.

 Surprised that I haven't seen more people discussing this use of Gloop. Isn't this the most broken thing ever?

If you cast this on turn 3 and then trade minions such that 3 die, you can then cast Living Mana to gain 6 Mana Treants.

When they die, you have successfully avoided the "this turn only" trigger on Floop's Glorious Gloop so you have accelerated by 3 crystals permanently, right?

Do we know if Mana Treant tokens count as Treants for Mulchmuncher?

I don’t like this card, but it sure has the best name ever

Poison Seeds

Just no...Play t9 Malygos and then, on t10, play this and Faceless Manipulator it for two malygos for 10-mana. Alternately, use this combo with Hadronox for two free taunt floods.

This is meta-defining, but not in a good way.

I don't understand the problem this thread is trying to solve.  When Casual is used as a "killing floor for netdeckers that play for the sole purpose of earning gold", how -- specifically -- is that bad for others? 

MMR is used in casual.  You will be paired against an opponent with a similar MMR to yourself.  If all the netdeckers have a high MMR and you with your fun homebrew deck have a low MMR, you won't see them.  If your fun homebrew deck can earn a high enough MMR to see them, then you're good enough to go toe-to-toe with them too.