The meta is as diverse as a rotating format ever will be, but that dosen't mean that Demon Hunter is balanced. For me, the problem is only the sick swing turns Altruis can get, though. Demon Hunter Should be good at card draw so Skull is fine in it's current state and I guess The class are supposed to have a lot of damage even IF you koll every single ninion the turn they play them. But Altruis going face is just to much. He can turn around a match faar to easy. He should only be a removal tool.
Zephrys problematic it doesn't recognize most of the new cards after each expansion. I opened similar post after Galakrond expension but it got even worst after the outland.
He is supposed to only offer classic and basic cards, so that's not the problem. The problem is that he is stupid.
What I think they should so is add a third format. Stop the nerfs and start banning in both Standard and Wild to balance the formats. This is the way it works in MTG and I think banning is superior to nerfing because this way people can play The banned cards in the third format. I would have loved to get to play old Patron or Worgen Warrior again :/
Buhuhu, nerf this and that. I hate every single aggro deck (I really think it's a brainless type of deck to play) but I understand that a card game needs different types of decks. Can you please understand that The game needs slower, grindier decks?
That's just my personal opinion but I feel like they are very, very linear atm do to the limited card pool. Every game feels the same and my control DH only feels like a slower midrange DH, not an etire different deck like it should.
As weird as it sounds, what they're doing makes a lot of sense. When you release a new class, nobody will know how to play it, meaning that whatever happens, people are going to be noodling around for a bit like newborn deer. More to the point, it's not gonna be easy to reliably release something that's truly balanced right out the gate.
The problem is, if you release a weak version of the class, what you'll get is a bunch of people trying it, deciding they don't like it, and then not touching it. Then, when you get around to buffing it to a balanced state, people just... aren't playing it. That means less data, and less ability to tell whether the class is actually good, or whether it's still too weak.
By starting in an overtuned state, everyone plays it, and you can pretty immediately figure out what needs nerfing.
Leastways, that's about what I've heard happen in DotA, and I'm assuming Blizzard is doing something like that here.
They don't need the players to understand that Skull of Guldan is too good. I hope they are playtesting at least. They released it this way to earn money. Nothing else.
You do understand that what makes a deck good is a mix of cards, right? You want both free cards and not free cards in a Demon Hunter deck. And no, it's not benefiting the guys who bought packs because they liked the Demon Hunter cards..
Holy shit, that is actually disgusting. This is false advertisement at it's finest.
I mean, I hate the class so far (boring to play with, boring to play against), but don't release cards you know are too strong to fool people into purchasing packs and then nerfing the cards they wanted right away. Disgusting.
That was the most disgusting answers I've ever seen in a Q&A. These developers are money oriented only and they don't realise they are digging their own grave. This Iksar dude seems like an asshole.
The threads on this forum get's dumber and dumber. Of course you can dislike a deck without loosing to it. I will always dislike every single face deck because I think they är stupid and boring. In Magic I'll always hate Tron, even though I am smashing it with the deck I play right now. It's just a boring deck to play against.
2
The meta is as diverse as a rotating format ever will be, but that dosen't mean that Demon Hunter is balanced. For me, the problem is only the sick swing turns Altruis can get, though. Demon Hunter Should be good at card draw so Skull is fine in it's current state and I guess The class are supposed to have a lot of damage even IF you koll every single ninion the turn they play them. But Altruis going face is just to much. He can turn around a match faar to easy. He should only be a removal tool.
That is the only card I would nerf though.
1
Altruis got better with the "nerf". What the hell were they thinking? Her 4 attack makes it harder for priest to kill.....
1
Holy shit, people in this community....
1
He is supposed to only offer classic and basic cards, so that's not the problem. The problem is that he is stupid.
1
What I think they should so is add a third format. Stop the nerfs and start banning in both Standard and Wild to balance the formats. This is the way it works in MTG and I think banning is superior to nerfing because this way people can play The banned cards in the third format. I would have loved to get to play old Patron or Worgen Warrior again :/
1
Buhuhu, nerf this and that. I hate every single aggro deck (I really think it's a brainless type of deck to play) but I understand that a card game needs different types of decks. Can you please understand that The game needs slower, grindier decks?
4
Not a bug. If they are collected at any point they count.
0
That's just my personal opinion but I feel like they are very, very linear atm do to the limited card pool. Every game feels the same and my control DH only feels like a slower midrange DH, not an etire different deck like it should.
6
They don't need the players to understand that Skull of Guldan is too good. I hope they are playtesting at least. They released it this way to earn money. Nothing else.
-2
You do understand that what makes a deck good is a mix of cards, right? You want both free cards and not free cards in a Demon Hunter deck. And no, it's not benefiting the guys who bought packs because they liked the Demon Hunter cards..
2
Holy shit, that is actually disgusting. This is false advertisement at it's finest.
I mean, I hate the class so far (boring to play with, boring to play against), but don't release cards you know are too strong to fool people into purchasing packs and then nerfing the cards they wanted right away. Disgusting.
0
Haven't lost a single game against DH yet with Spell Mage
2
That was the most disgusting answers I've ever seen in a Q&A. These developers are money oriented only and they don't realise they are digging their own grave. This Iksar dude seems like an asshole.
5
Every deck. This game has become pure trash. I loved it back in the days but the developers has not idea how to keep it interesting.
Downvotes is coming <3
2
The threads on this forum get's dumber and dumber. Of course you can dislike a deck without loosing to it. I will always dislike every single face deck because I think they är stupid and boring. In Magic I'll always hate Tron, even though I am smashing it with the deck I play right now. It's just a boring deck to play against.