I'm on team mean, the issue with both the median and the mode is that those ones are actually far too low because of the high amount of 40 dust packs. 40 dust is a realistic expectation when opening 1 pack but not a realistic value to attribute to the average value in a bundle.
In statistical terms, the argument is the distribution of packs is a chi-square distribution rather than a normal distribution, but I would argue that that only means smaller samples are more inaccurate, the expected value per pack is still the same before opening, especially when comparing larger bundles. If you are worried that the off chance of a golden legendary is too low, then remove those packs from your sample and work with that average.
For the sake of argument, fill in 40 as your expected value. The value of the 20 packs in the 20 bonuspacks in the WW bundle only amounts to 800, while you know there have been 2 epics, maybe more and the chance of a legendary is pretty decent. You see that it doesn't hold.
Also, in the first 10 packs of every expansion that you open you have at least one guaranteed legendary.
Thanks for the reply. I will trust you on this one. I wasn't talking about the people that made videos on your decks. They are pretty much making a video of every popular deck. I wasn't saying that "you copy decks no question about it". I was pretty frustrated by the popularity of your decks and I didn't personally liked them. I don't like the way you write them.
First, I think I didn't tried to be an authority on this. There are a lot of other people that said that your decks are this way. All your other decks are this way:
This is the worst. The meta miracle wit 2X mountains giants. They have absolutely no space in rogue. I see you've swapped them with dirty rat and yogg. This is even worse.
Don't take it personal, but your decks get a lot of upvotes in such short periods. I think you are using bots to upvote and comment. I know I may be wrong but there are a lot of comments which are written by account which didn't do anything, except just the c comments on your deck.
I think your analogy between plagiarism in card games and chess is plain wrong. In chess I don't think it can be any plagiarism. The first turns don't have no corelation with a Hearthstone deck. It is more like the esports. If a pro-player uses a net-deck does that mean he comitted plagiarism? I don't think so.
All in all, I don't mind if you copy net-deck and explain how to play it (explained clear, not as you do). But I think you've done more, upvoting your own decks to make them popular.
This deck can be played without patches but it will not be that good. Considering that we have just 4 pirates and 2 weapons in the deck you will most likely don't experience much synergy between Pirates and Weapons. The Pirates are used as a activator of patches but if you don't get any pirates before turn 3 it is pretty useless. So I think you can play it without patches. You can put a Fiery Bat instead of him. If you want to havew more synergy with weapons you can play it in Wild with 2 Glaivezooka instead of patches and a loot horder.
0
Sorry, didn't read the whole comment.
0
Also, in the first 10 packs of every expansion that you open you have at least one guaranteed legendary.
2
Might be a stupid question, but can I slip a Fan of Knives in this deck?
For the paladins.
1
Played against priest as shaman.
Turn one: Dust Devil + The coin + Dust Devil
Turn two: Atacked 12 damage face
Turn Three: Rockbiter Weapon => 18 damage face
0
Thanks a lot.
4
Thanks for the reply. I will trust you on this one. I wasn't talking about the people that made videos on your decks. They are pretty much making a video of every popular deck. I wasn't saying that "you copy decks no question about it". I was pretty frustrated by the popularity of your decks and I didn't personally liked them. I don't like the way you write them.
2
First, I think I didn't tried to be an authority on this. There are a lot of other people that said that your decks are this way. All your other decks are this way:
-http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/833933-76-win-rate-controlled-evolution-mulligan-guide
I've seen this EXACT variation of shaman two weeks ago and it is not a control deck.
-http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/809736-71-winrate-taunt-warrior-update707
A very basic Taunt Warrior build, nothing special
-http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/816970-68-wr-mountain-miracle-rogue-anti-priest-update
This is the worst. The meta miracle wit 2X mountains giants. They have absolutely no space in rogue. I see you've swapped them with dirty rat and yogg. This is even worse.
Don't take it personal, but your decks get a lot of upvotes in such short periods. I think you are using bots to upvote and comment. I know I may be wrong but there are a lot of comments which are written by account which didn't do anything, except just the c comments on your deck.
I think your analogy between plagiarism in card games and chess is plain wrong. In chess I don't think it can be any plagiarism. The first turns don't have no corelation with a Hearthstone deck. It is more like the esports. If a pro-player uses a net-deck does that mean he comitted plagiarism? I don't think so.
All in all, I don't mind if you copy net-deck and explain how to play it (explained clear, not as you do). But I think you've done more, upvoting your own decks to make them popular.
I don't think it is right to do so.
1
I think it is. Considering that there are 2X Sunfury Protector and a Defender of Argus.
But i get your point: radiant elemental + potion of madness or power word: shield is pretty good.
3
This is a worst version of http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/711120-purify-priest-ungoro-edition .You copied it and replaced some cards with not so good replacements.
All your other decks are the same. Are plagiarisms and your guides are so big and incosistent.
12
I tought they were lowering the prices when I saw this , But... I don't know what to say.
Why would they do this ?
0
Why not The Curator?
2
The new Freeze Mage.:)
0
True:). But they can help you cycle trought your deck so you can find the burst for lethal.
2
Thanks for your comment.
This deck can be played without patches but it will not be that good. Considering that we have just 4 pirates and 2 weapons in the deck you will most likely don't experience much synergy between Pirates and Weapons. The Pirates are used as a activator of patches but if you don't get any pirates before turn 3 it is pretty useless. So I think you can play it without patches. You can put a Fiery Bat instead of him. If you want to havew more synergy with weapons you can play it in Wild with 2 Glaivezooka instead of patches and a loot horder.
26
why so many rude comments? you can replace Lord Jaraxxus with Alexstrasza and Sylvanas Windrunner with Ragnaros the Firelord