I feel this deck still needs 1 loatheb. I don't know what I would cut, but loatheb would do a lot imo. same with 1 FOK. especially since you have the blood mage. Maybe cut an SI7 and a belcher as insane as that sounds.
Edit: Actually, if everyone plays control then I guess that FOK is not needed
Man you got some pretty good points here. what about sir murgleton? he seems like he could function as decent early game and combo initiator, especially since you run no weapon support.
Main reason I am worried about Z chow is specifically because of the negative synergy.
Ok, I would wait. Play lots of arena and you will be able to get the dust while simultaneously learning better strategies to make that bling warrior deck you'll have someday that much more satisfying.
0
maybe some twilight guardians?
2
maybe instead you could try coldlight oracle and loot hoarders?
0
fair enough. any suggested replacement for thalnos? anything you can think of that gives the same tempo?
0
Perhaps swap SI 7 for Edwin Van Cleef?
0
maybe Van Cleef?
3
Looks excellent! perhaps you could cut a FOK for a vancleef?
0
Call on the doctor.
2
I feel this deck still needs 1 loatheb. I don't know what I would cut, but loatheb would do a lot imo. same with 1 FOK. especially since you have the blood mage. Maybe cut an SI7 and a belcher as insane as that sounds.
Edit: Actually, if everyone plays control then I guess that FOK is not needed
0
If you want, I feel you could sub 1 sprint for a cold light oracle
1
I feel like Blade flurry is not needed, especially with mrrglton in your deck.
Maybe instead FOK?
Also not a giant fan of rivendare, and not sold on oracle in the deck.
Personally, I would:
-rivendare
-2x coldlight oracles
- Blade Flurry
-2 Knife Juggler
+2 SI 7
+2 Back Stab
+1 FOK
+1 Bloodmage or healbot (16 health for 8 sounds pretty nuts)
0
maybe instead of Jones (though thematically awesome he is) loatheb?
2
I don't think that blade flurry is needed. Maybe FOK would be better?
Also I'm not sold on Brann.... will require testing but I feel defender/azure/Loatheb may be better
1
...Well Played
0
Man you got some pretty good points here. what about sir murgleton? he seems like he could function as decent early game and combo initiator, especially since you run no weapon support.
Main reason I am worried about Z chow is specifically because of the negative synergy.
0
Ok, I would wait. Play lots of arena and you will be able to get the dust while simultaneously learning better strategies to make that bling warrior deck you'll have someday that much more satisfying.