Hearthpwn

So kids, you can choose ANY type of fruit that you like. Or just have a bag of mixed candy, but who would choose that?!

Quote from vNihilism >>

Quote from IDBY >>

Quote from LightKeeperCZ >>

Im voting Eonar no matter what :) ... I dont like Sargeras and I prefer to keep the original spirit of voting instead of gaming the system.

I am not sure the opinion in a post from a player that has posted here 3 times in two years is important. The whole purpose of the event is to give out packs, nothing more. Nothing will change in respect to any cards of the expansion, or any other part of the expansion.The expansion is only two weeks away, changes to anything have likely been frozen internally by Blizzard for a couple of months.
Feel free to vote for whoever you want. But if you vote for a less popular selection you will miss out on getting more packs for the upcoming expansion.

 Exactly, like, "Today I will miss out on free stuff to vote fairly in a poll designed by a soulless corporation to hype their cash machine card game [Clueless]"

 And here I put heart and soul into figuring out my dream future for the universe. Now you're telling me that the future of WOW and Blizzard as a whole is not decided by this crucial vote of mine?! 

I think people underestimate serenity. Holy nova struggles with the 2/3s and 4/3s that your shadow priest opponent plays consistently. Here, every enemy is at least kept somewhat in place. It's still "destroy all enemy minions with 2 or less attack" which was a 4 mana card once. It's not great and it's meant for anti-aggro, but your control deck needs such cards

I get that a third copy of any secret can mess with you, but 2 hunter secrets for 4 mana... Isn't that that pretty fair? It's what hunter secrets cost and you have the potential low roll, in return 1 card that can be a 2 and a 4 drop.

If you have an amount of money that you want to spend, this is arguably a pretty good shot if your collection isn't the largest. Sure, Titan packs will be worth more, but they will also cost more and probably still require older cards for their good decks. 

If you are having fun playing with the cards you have now, you might as well wait :)

Is there actually anybody who isn't voting for Sargeras? 

1: Buff abilities allows quick tier up with strong early game minions. Gold/ramp abilities allows it with "sell me" minions

2: every build has its essential tier(s) that you should aim for rushing into and staying at for a bit, but be careful not to get stuck there. Like rolling endlessly in t3 for Tarec'gosa. 

3: The early t1 triples are 95% of the time bait...

+1: Mechs are insane since magnetic synergizes with all kinds of buff effects (buff for hand and lobby, stat swap and end of turn effects) Naga, murlocs and pirates are harder to land IMO

Quote from gm6 >>

Quote from PetiteMouche >>

If you can get every card for free why would you pay for them ? I don't understand your dilemma.

 my dilemma is to spend or to multiply. 

 I don't think that you'll see much growth coming from this investment thou ;) 

I would ask my self "when will I spend all of my resources?". One day you'll quit playing this game and by then, every grain of dust will practically be wasted. Of course you can just make a lot of golden cards in the end, but you wouldn't post this if you just enjoyed spending money on the game right? 

If I were you I would just get the battle pass for the green XP and other cosmetic features that make me feel better and start butchering some of that dust. You won't even spend half of it anyway.

Of course we'll vote for the bad guy. Who cares if the card is good?

I haven't faced bots in standard EU, but some of the ropers in wild and classic may have been. I don't think I've faced a blizzard bot which should be meant for low MMR players.

My impression is that legend is still a rather small fraction of all players. Not that there aren't thousands of relatively bad players up there, but I think it still tells at least something about your skill and dedication. 

I didn't reach legend in the old system. Seemed like you had to play face hunter for 2h a day or just spend your holiday on it. I think the difficulty really depends on the meta. My first legend took a few hours and felt easy (aggro druid 2020). In standard it felt significantly more challenging but also time consuming.

Legend means that you had some ambitions for your play and enjoy the project of ranking up in a game. If you just want a bit of entertainment every now and then, it's probably not gonna happen :)

https://www.vicioussyndicate.com/vs-data-reaper-report-264/

Aaaaah good to know... Them cheeky bastards ;)

Are you sure that your devices are set to the same country? Pretty sure that ie. the Battlepass costs 20€ no matter the device in the top paying countries.

I would be very surprised if Blizzard could get away with posting the odds for the different rarities, knowing that those odds weir false or skewing the odds like that  (Pity timer is no secret). Celestalon has posted rarity odds numerous times and I don't think that he's willing to go to court over it...

I think the card just falls into that price-effect combination that doesn't suit any deck. It's solid value for the cost, but it's not a big thread and it's too expensive to really be dangerous. Your value mid range deck usually has better class cards that can guarantee an even stickier board and your deathrattle combo won't need it either. Burn/pressure? Nah... Control has more urgent matters to attend and aggro already won so.... Arena card! :)

I'm curious how people conclude that their draw was rigged. It often seems like anything that isn't an average of all values is considered rigged or ANY card being pulled was suddenly the unlikely event that proved it all. 

Would it make sense to make the counter card more likely to appear from discover? It would add to the excitement, but my experience is that people tend to pull out cards that are just powerful complimentary effects, making that miracle Twisting Nether from 3 turns before a lot less sensational.

Would it make sense to match up people in accordance to their win rate and play experience? ABSOLUTELY! It's called match making and it's no secret that it's an essential part of the ladder experience, just like those people in the NFL aren't randomly picked, because an unfair match-up is a waste of all players time.