Hearthpwn

What Kind of playstyle do you like?

It has no effect on the opponents Hand, so everybody who isnt stupid keeps a removal in his hand.

That would leave you with nothing ;)

As I understand Aura effects, anything that messes with the Aura on board should revert it.

Be it a remove (direkt or indirect) a silence or w/e, when the Aura is gone the effect is gone.

I doubt it's any different in this case and if it is it will be fixed

Dude I feel you. I am a warrior/warlock Main. In both classes intressted in control or at least controlish decks. 

There was nothing mentionworthy in a while.

Gladly I also like midrange hunter decks and thats viable atm, even though nobody rly knows 

My last tie was with hunter, against mage I believe. Tavish gave me the, deal 9 dmg after 3 cards secret. I picked it cuz I knew I'll gonna die next turn.

Luckily my opponent had to play 3 cards for lethal. 

We both died. :)

I Putin fealin in my 30 Warrior list, for longer battles against 40 lists, in a 40 card Deck I wouldnt use him.

P.s. thanks for all the answers so far, gave me a few ideas. Keep in Posting everybody

Not much to add to the title.

I am just curious how you use the sidedeck effect, in Standard.

To me it seems mostly like a toolknife for potential tech cards so far.

Whuat, anybody can confirm that? It sounds like you try to tell ous that you saw a car with 5 wheels.

I'd assume you've been stoned as hell. I mean there are 7 slots (probably hard coded) so this sounds as crazy to me as a car with 5 wheels 

Quote from Manbarondenna >>

Lightforged Cariel was one of the most popular legendaries to include and probably the worst card to include from the paladin kit. All it ever did was make the game way longer than it had to be, and all paladins who played it against me eventually conceded or died. I think out of the quests the worst offenders were hunter and warrior, priest quest was fine, the rest were trash. 

 Huh, dunno what you played but quest warlock was a awesome deck, until raise dead was gone

Well botting to plat seems possible with oppressive aggro decks, there isnt much room for failure if all you gotta do is to hit face.

I'd assume many of that bots are actually chinese ppl trying to "recover" what they lost, before they start to play serious.

On lower ranks and empty modes blizzard placed bots intentionally a while ago.

P.s. the chinese bot accounts could be more advanced and possible be played manually from time to time, thus they climb higher

Ok, now I am confused. I am not saying there arent any bots, as high mmr Player I cant even comment on this... but ppl said "bots dont Show up in recent opponents", now you show us a list of recent opponents claiming they are bots.

I have no idea how that wild interaction worked but I must assume they cheated their own copy out.

In that case it's not a generated card/minion 

Evolve was a thing before the Mini set, just not as popular and it wasnt possible to evolve into colossals.

Blizz just forgott about that rule with the new discover evolve spell.

So it was a bug fix and not a nerf.

You cant generate colossals, it is a rule. You can discover them (to your hand) but not onto the board.

This is a buff if you want to play a truckload of trash taunts.

So to me it's a nerf in fact, you lose the tutor for a value (or big) taunt opportunity. 

I had ideas for that card that required it to be 3 mana to work on curve.

Now I'd have to wait for turn 7, so no tempo gain from that "buff" and it lost it's tutor value aswell. Nothing worse then drawing you taunts before you want to play that card. 

Well at least it's a cheap draw for warrior and possible turn 1 play, thats both rare in that class. It just bugs me as warrior Player to lose value from a card.

I think it should be A, every class should have a viable Deck for the climb to legend. At legend it's a different Story. 

If this would be done right, B could possibly apply by default. Sadly blizz abandoned class identity.