Hearthpwn

Quote from Kossetsu »

As already stated, it would work well with mass removal like Flamestrike. Other than that, it just seems like a boring card.

That's another issue. It _is_ a boring card. With only 31 cards in the whole "set", you'd think they'd make something more interesting. 5 minutes in the card creation forum on here turns up 10 far better ideas for cards than this. Feels like a waste.

Hard to evaluate this card. Face value says "not good", but I can see the potential. Giants mage might like it... feels like it fits in a control style where you generally have quite a full hand, good aoe and lots of options. Then you can pick your time to flamestrike his dr. boom and pay 2 or less to finish the boom with this.

Time will tell.

I'd love for them to introduce some keywords from WoWTCG: 

Assault X: Has +X Attack on your turn only

Berserk: Gain +1 Attack whenever you take damage

Long-Range: Defenders deal no damage to you 

A 6 mana 9/9 would become a staple I think... big enough to survive almost all other "big" creatures that are played today, Alex, Rag, Giants etc. I agree that a 6 mana 8/8 would see play but not be a staple card.

I'm not a very good arena player, play irregularly and still have a 12-2 win under my belt. I'd say my average would be a 4-3 run. People tend to forget the 0-3 or 1-3 runs they have and remember the 10-3 or 9-3 runs a lot more.

The change is simple: Swap BGH and Hemet Nesingwary's card text.

A 5 cost 6-3 is more in line with the super-power of his effect, while the flavor fits too... after all, how is no-name BGH a better hunter than Hemet?! Lastly, though it is uncommon, some people run two BGHs, which would be impossible if the card text were on legendary Hemet.

I replaced the cards with Control Warrior and it's working great! :)

I generally complete quests in Casual and rarely play it otherwise, so I play efficient decks that will get my quest finished as fast as possible. Though that's only if I get a quest for a class I'm not currently playing in ranked (or I get stuck with the play low cost minions quest).

Jeeves probably doesn't work in a combo deck, because you want to hold on to all your combo pieces. Replace with 2x Arcane Intellect.

You also have a Mad Scientist but no secrets? That makes him just a 2/2 for 2, you can do better there (2nd doomsayer if poss).

I see you are running a low budget freeze mage, but it's really hard to make that work without Alexstrasza, and ideally you'd also have Antonidas and Thalnos. 

Foe Reaper was my first. Also opened Golden Sneed's Shredder. Oh yeah!

I'm not voting for Hillery, er... Kibler, I'm voting for Trump.

#MakeHearthstoneGreatAgain

#Trump2K16

Yogg-Saron , The maddest bomber

As the housing market becomes less and less affordable for middle class citizens, wealthy landlords will start snapping up properties more rapidly and renting them out to tenants, to the point at which it's almost unheard of for anyone making less than 6 figures to ever afford their own home. Soon thereafter, the government will propose legislation enforcing federally-mandated pricing on real estate, or an "equity trickle" program to keep rent down; if the rent you charge your tenants per month is greater than X% of the amount at which the property has been assessed for tax purposes, the tenant is granted equity in the property equal to the difference.

Called it.

that moment when you need to meet ben brodes rng quota for a expansion

I personally think that all the voting cards are spells. Warlock, Druid and Rogue are probably the 3 class-spells which will be released soon from the remaining votes.. I don't say that because of the art but in the last expansions the votes were allways legendary vs legendary or no legendary cards at all. (if I remember correctly)

Justicar, no question.  

Sometimes a sheep just isn't explosive enough....

Also the petition to change the artwork and name to N'zoth Testicle begins here and now. And not just because the card is bollocks

I'm guessing that means the nerfs are announced tomorrow?  A certain "I've got the Old God you worked hard to buff in my sights" seems likelier and likelier.  

It'll at least be something different if there are a few nerfs and appealing Preview/new Base cards to toy around with.  I'm excited. 

I am sorry.

I think Blizzard should not bring back old cardbacks.

I myself dont have any blizzcon cardbacks and also not the pandarian cardback and yes i would like to have them but now you can see from your opponent when he has the first cardback ever that he is playing from the verry start of HS.

This will go away when you bring back old cardbacks and i would not like that to happen.

Plus i just love the fact i can have something in the game to show off that others just cant get. :)