Hearthpwn

Im glad that Paladin is among the classes I don't play, but falvor wise like someone said before there was plenty of good characters to bring for this and they chose a murloc?.

Well that's gonna get nerfed... and I hope they do it fast, maybe without Rush it would be balanced, but now it's just op.

I said it in the card discussion, but imma say it again here: it's a 10 mana card with a strong effect, but realistically this card won't see much play unless there are good ways to cheat it out fast and summoning a bunch of 7/7's is strong but in later stages of the game there is plenty of board wipes to deal with them. Also weak to silence and Sap as ppl pointed out above.

it's a 10 mana card with a strong effect, but realistically this card won't see much play unless there are good ways to cheat it out fast.

Demon Hunter or Hunter has killed you twice before turn 10 if the main gameplan is generating value with this dude and even then summoning a bunch of 7/7's is strong but at that stage of the game there is plenty of board wipes to deal with them.

a great arena card though.

Quote from tParabol >>

 

Also do we really get the Demon hunter cards for free??? 

 to my understanding all the demon hunter cards that are in the "initate set" will be free, not cards that are part of the AoO set though obviously.

The demon hunter base set is free.

Aggro will never die as long as hunters hero power is 2 damage to face this game will have an aggressive deck running around.

As for the people complaining about "dragon expansion having aggro meta" or the lack of good dragon decks:

1. the meta is about huge swing turns atm and the decks that have the best swing turns atm can be weak to aggro.

2. the strongest decks are always going to be the ones that can feature op cards from multiple sets in the format that play well together (highlander or lackeys for example atm) = not enough good dragon support in the format = most classes don't have enough good cards to build a dragon deck around.

3. Aggro is good for climbing due to fast matches (duh)

4. one of the best decks in the meta atm is a dragon deck (dragon hunter) so why do you complain Kappa.

A rare minion that casts Avenging Wrathat the end of every turn? Well this seems balanced.

Might be a nice meme deck for sure, but it sounds like a clunkier combo priest that hasn't been good in ages.

it's been a thing more or less since GvG. They always try to push archetypes, but they are often hit or miss. Like in the current expansion Galagrond decks were good enough to see top level play, but there has been maaaaaaaany archetypes that they have pushed over the years that have never worked for example discard warlock.

Might be fun to try out in embiggen druid or then just some crazy combo

It's playable even without the battlecry in some instances as just 4 mana deal 5  with rush and given the you can fetch it turn 3 with Diving Gryphon, it will see play or experimenting at least.

Well it has 2 uses so you can literally use that hero power 2 times, if you refresh it you can use both charges at the same turn and after that it will revert back to your normal hero power.

Quote from SummerWalker >>

Quote from Toralan >>

Wild is a good place if you wanna play "home brews" as you can go quite far without facing a lot of the op wild meta decks and as for standard, I have had some success with my home brew decks even against the op top tier decks and the current meta isn't that aggressive anymore since rogue isn't as dominant as it was let's say a month or two ago.

 Way too expensive.

 If you have played for a long time = have a good collection, wild is arguably cheaper than standard or it is for me at least. Of course if you don't have cards from old sets it can be harder to get into, but there are decent budget friendly decks in wild too.

It has potential of being  2 for 1 every time but the obvious tempo loss still makes it bad.