Hearthpwn

I can't believe there isn't a Fel Reaver card, unless I missed it.  It could have been an 8 Cost 15/15 that lies dormant unless the opposing player ends their turn with a minion directly across from it. (Think of the chess brawl mechanics).  FeelsSadMan

I still think blizz is paranoid about somehow making priest OP.  Shaman was bad for a long time, then all of a sudden they are tier 1.  Honestly though, I think its almost impossible to make a class seriously OP. There should always be a counter/anti-meta to keep that from happening.  Maybe I'm wrong, idk.  I think priest is getting there, but isn't there yet, we will see I guess.  If there was a Unicorn priest deck out there I'm fairly certain someone would have figured it out by now.  We also have to take into account that priest in general is more of a control type class.  It takes much more thought to play a control deck than a face deck as we all know.  More people are going to grind to legend with a face deck than a control deck.  Games in a control match tend to take 2-3 times as long than going face. Some people are going to gravitate to ways that they can Min/Max.  As in, "I'm going to play something that will get me to legend as fast as possible."  I'm speaking in terms of Standard ladder.

I like it.  Getting rekt by zoolocks though. 

They should just make it draw 2 cards instead of 1.

Basically he is saying purify is so bad he is taking out of arena, lol.

Hearthpwn is the best site about Hearthstone that I ever see! You guys are so organize and take care of the minimous details. I am very thankful for your job. S2

Heh. #3, Grumble's Rumble, can be done without ever using Grumble. Takes the fun out of it, but...

1. Fire Plume Harbinger

2. Zola the Gorgon , on Fire Plume Harbinger

3. Murmuring Elemental

4. Fire Plume Harbinger

5. Battery Pack

6. Snowfury Giant

7. Battery Pack

8. Shadowflame , targeting Snowfury Giant

9. Back-up Plan

I found a great interaction with one of the easiest bosses A.F.K.... If you emote "Well played" all HELL IS ABOUT TO BREAK LOOSE!!!
Thanks guys try it out on your 1st turn after "greetings" emote sooooo yeah GL&HF
I am making this a new challenge in HS : BEAT A.F.K after you emote "Well played!"

I challenge you

Disguised Toast

!!!

PS UP-VOTE SO HE SEES THIS ! :)

I will not be playing this mode because I do not plan to throw money away.

That said I am happy to miss 1 week of brawl for the pros/hardcore players to have some fun.

I do not believe this brawl to be anything other than a money grab but when you play everyday most of the day that wont bother you :)

Can I just say, this is NOT a ladder deck. It is SPECIFICALLY made for tournaments to counter Control Warrior. Don't play this on ladder.

Do you have any win rate stats you can show?

 Just hit rank 10 for the first time ever -- this deck allowed me to break my record from rank 14 (last month).  Much appreciated!  Here's an updated list of my 157 standard ranked games between ranks 17 and 11.  Games in which an opponent conceded on turn one are not included.

Classes

• Very good:  Shaman (62%, 16-10), Druid (61%, 11-7)
• Average: Warrior (52%, 11-10), Priest (50%, 7-7), Hunter (46%, 11-13)
• Poor: Mage (44%, 12-15), Warlock (42%, 5-7), Rogue (40%, 2-3)
• Terrible: Paladin (30%, 3-7)

Rogue, and to a lesser extent Warlock and Paladin are such low sample sizes that the win rate could change significantly with just a few more games.

Stats

• Overall: 50% win rate (78-79)
• Win rate with/without coin: 54%/46%
• Average game length: 13 turns, 9.6 minutes.

As has already been stated action would be nice. But in terms of hearing things? 

Don't worry so much about future speculations, we can do plenty of that, on our own, with or without vague half-announcements. Simply report on the past and present development of Hearthstone:  Post statistics, info-graphics, pick rates, win rates, player trends, etc.  Justify your actions AND inactions, with actual data, AS you decide on them.  Prove that you're doing your job(s) as designers competently, with data driven, due diligence, and that you actually have the players best interest at heart.  

This would have a HUGE impact on your public perception, because EVERY time you DON'T provide support for your decisions we assume the worst, and it makes you look either callous, incompetent, greedy, or all of the above.

You people don't even know what you want.

"We want you to give us answers NOW!"

"We don't want you to give us answers until you have the solution."

"We want to know exactly when you will have a solution."

Have any of you worked on anything?