Hearthpwn

No one:
Blizzard: We heard you and we're bringing another Shaman Hero skin. You're welcome!

It is honestly beyond me to find a good reason as to why more slots aren't being implemented. Seriously, we need more people to voice this on forums or twitter, so they implement this ASAP. 

Wild is cheaper for sure! 5300 dust is enough to get you a tier 1 deck.

I would recommend you elaborate on the type of playstyle you prefer. If you prefer grinding ladder, I would suggest you craft a tier 1 deck, stick with it and avoid crafting general legendaries. However, if you enjoy playing a variety of decks then go for legendaries used in multiple decks, like zephyrs or zilliax.

Catching up to standard would honestly take you a while as all of the deck excluding hunter require a few too many legendaries. 

The card is a substitute for silence, whenever meta demands such a card it will change; otherwise, it won't see any play.

As of now, there's no need to run silence, so it's unlikely it will be seen in any deck anytime soon.

ya mine broke as well

Yes, it is manipulated, 100%. Every game I have ever lost in hearthstone was the dev's fcking with me. I am a the fcking GOAT at this game, it makes no sense I would lose, especially when I have actually spent money. Anyone who disagrees has sided themselves with the devs and need to be exposed.

Any claim made without any evidence does not need to be disapproved, as logic states. So as long the claimant doesn't reinforce his argument, it should be dismissed immediately. And it doesn't take a genius to realise that no argument can be put forth here without a dev, literally coming out and saying that they are rigging rng. 

I'm sorry, OP, but I will have to disagree with a lot of points mentioned. Before I go on with my post, I will say that DH does need a nerf but not because it is problematic in wild but because it is utter garbage in standard. 

My experience is a lot different from yours; it seems.

Secret Mage - While slow in comparison; secret mage cruses aggro decks because of Arcane Flakmage and Flame ward. I would say the match-up is slightly more favoured for the mage, around 65-35. 

Even Hunter - No experience playing, so I take your word.

Warlock - Disco warlock has the most disgusting draw in the meta and is arguably the faster aggro deck.
                  Cube, I agree, is a hit or miss.

Quest Mage - This deck just loses to most aggro decks.

Mech Pally - This deck is extremely draw-dependant, so I agree. 50-50

Raza Priest - This entirely depends on the variant you are playing. Jeppeto variant = loss against every aggro deck.
                       Dragon variant absolutely crushed DH, possibly in my experience the best counter to DH due to almost infinite amount of board clear available to you.

Druid - Too much randomness, agreed; especially when playing Kael'thas version. The Vargoth version fares a lot better, but it's also extremely bad against control decks.

Tempo Storm is a funny website with really strange deck variants and abhorrent rankings; I would suggest you look elsewhere. My grind to legend this month proved a lot easier due to the plethora of odd DH decks nesting at higher ranks. If you are curious, I climbed with Raza Priest, and my best match-ups were against DH.

Whoever is saying Nourish should be unnerfed has no idea the impact this would have on wild. Druid is already tier 1 and absolutely needs no further support. 

I think shaman was just designed extremely poorly from the start, ridiculously overpowered Galakrond to the point where almost every card in shaman was nerfed, ultimately making the deck unplayable. Just all around poor insight and lack of testing. Why the fuck does the most powerful invoke effect need a card that invokes twice?

Personally, I wanted Galakrond itself to be nerfed or overhauled. That way the deck could've been saved, but as I see it now, anything being reverted makes it broken again.

I will say, invocation of frost needs to be unnerfed. People are comparing it to glacial shard but forgetting that glacial shard is a neutral whereas invocation of frost is a class card; ideally it should be slightly more powerful. I think this would be the least problematic revert.

Since you can't lose ranks at this points, just tell him to insta concede to DH, I'm 100% serious, no new deck can compete against it, and there's simply no point to it.

Either make him play DH, or just insta concede till he hits bronze 10 when he finally gets his free deck, also make him claim the frozen throne to get an extra leg death knight to disenchant so he can get some dust out of it.

Quote from Master_Roxas >>

I would say buff cards from AOO expansion for the classes that aren't demon hunter, 1 card each.
My reason is that this expansion had very low power level compared to year of the dragon expansions and adventure and classes could use the help so they can play creative and multible decks and not just that 1 deck that can beat demon hunter.

 That's how blizzard releases expansions though, the power Lvl of the last expansion before rotation is always the highest, I think we can expect to see the same this year as well. 

Personally I like this strategy as it makes the meta a little crazy during the last 3 months but things are kinda thrown off with DH coming out on such an absurd power level.

Lord Jaraxxus: Too weak in its current form, although a buff here, done incorrectly might make the card bonkers. Frankly, I'm not entirely sure how this could be buffed, but perhaps making it safer to play would be my first go. Maybe add another battlecry, deal 3 damage to all minion?

Dragoncaller Alanna: I am head over heels on the concept of this card, but it's sooooo fcking hard to set up properly and instantly gets cleared, I would suggest making it 8 mana or maybe reducing the base cost of the spell needed to 4

Bolvar, Fireblood: Maybe blizzard hates Bolvar and always comes up with the most ridiculous effect to make him the worst legendary of the set, poor guy. He is such an awesome character in the warcraft lore and seriously needs a power creep!

Moorabi: I mean, do I really need to explain this one?

Hi, 

I have been playing hearthstone in and out for a while now (around 3 years more or less) and i absolutely adore the game, mostly a wild player myself I am no stranger to spending money on this game; So far I've enjoyed buying bundles and expansion pre-order but I have to step in here and say please don't support this pack.

I don't recall ever shit talking in hearthpwn or anywhere else abt hearthstone and I know i cannot assert my opinions onto others, but this kind of behavior from blizzard has to stop, this is by far the most shameful money grab I have ever seen. I do understand that they are trying something new here but this "something new" could potentially create problems for players in the future for the following reasons:

1) Identifying a market for whales - If overpriced packs start selling well, a divided market would potentially grow where price difference between bundles would be huge; inevitably blizzard would start catering whales and games that get selective this way don't do too well. I believe in a level playing field for everyone.
2) Encourage blizzard to release more overpriced packs - This is pretty obvious, If this pack does well blizzard will start advertising these packs more often --> hence more monetization
3) This is coming at the cost of superior deals - Blizzard putting effort here means its coming at the cost of other amazing deals. So far both the dragonmaster bundle and the pedotree deals were really rewarding and relatively cheap, compare this to that and you can see you are getting scammed.
4) More Monetization - Hearthstone is old, lets face it, in it's prime it had no competition and thus no reason to push itself or make the game cheaper, it was quite literally the only option u had, but things have changed now. The last thing we need is this game getting more expensive and less accessible to aspiring players. This bundle is 2$ a pack compared to normal 1.47$ with quite honestly little to no advantage, the restriction of buying only 5 makes it even worse so that some unfortunate soul who didn't score a legendary is stuck having wasted $10 for nothing. bundles often come at 0.8-1$ a pack which is honestly why they sell well, they are significantly cheaper.

I would like to say that the idea here is actually quite agreeable, however the way its being executed is quite insulting.
Obviously every1 is free to do as they wish and you could argue that chances of legendary are rather high, but I would like to take this chance and encourage everyone to stand as a community and not condone such behavior. All this talk about the summit and this is the first thing we get, honestly quite disappointing. 

i don't understand the pricing at all, you normally get 7 packs for 10 EUR and now you're getting 5? How is this even remotely helpful I don't understand, i guess it's a bit more specific so might help a little, don't really see these packs getting any popularity though tbh.

Also if I understand correctly, it's a new pack type so legendary guaranteed within the first 10?

I am excited but tbh would be nice if they dropped some hints.

Dragonqueen Alexstrasza and Frizz Kindleroost probably the luckiest I've been in a long ass time; this was from the dragon master bundle btw