Hearthpwn

If you are a normal priest player like me, remember to include mindrender illucia. My winrate against that deck is about 70% just because of that card. Yes you have to draw it but the combo rarely happened on turn 7. Maybe it‘s just my luck or their bad draws, but i have much more problems against other decks.

But yes, it feels aweful to play against so nerf it :D.

The only true point is the cost reduction not to 0. no cards should cost nothing. That would also kinda solve the secret mage problem because it casts almost any secret for nothing.

To be able to see secrets is a horrible idea. Then you can simply delete the cards from the game. Would be the same result.

i don‘t really care about Tickatus so i have no opinion about that.

The randomness in the game is something i actually appreciate since it‘s the only thing that seperates it from the normal real card games like Magic. But it should be less polarizing. Random targets are funny, random summons can be incredibly unfair.

Btw they didn‘t miss it in playtesting. They already said that they are aware of it and keep an eye on it from the beginning. So it won‘t take much time until they nerf something

Wretched Tiller Nerf = if it attacks the enemy hero deal 2 damage to it....done. No major mechanic nerf, no hysteria nerf. It‘s that simple and everyone can complain about raza priest again.

Well i think this biscuit card for mage will be included in every single quest mage probably. It doesn‘t shake things up at all because it‘s already all over the place but it will be affected.

This system is perfect for blizzard. It makes the „normal“ players happy because they get a little more gold and it punishes those players who play(ed) a lot and grinded gold that way by prolonging the procedure of getting gold at all. It used to be 10 gold after 3 wins. Now its 50 gold after 4-5h like you say. It‘s about the same rate if you don‘t play hyper aggro but it‘s much more exhausting because you don‘t feel the small reward after the 3 wins.

It‘s way worse than DH. It just feels like a dice roll. And one that is favoured for the shaman player. It‘s simply unfair that it can evolve in the same turn where he is playing a garbage minion that copies itself. If there will be a nerf it has to be on knuckles. This is the core problem of this deck. It should evolve a random minion. It would be ok if it would evolve into a minion which costs 2 or 3 more but the whole board is too much. That encourages players to play this 1/1 beast that copies itself (don‘t remember the name).

Its hard to see on the screenshot but is it odd paly? Congrats btw :) didn‘t manage to do it yet. Maybe someday but i‘m not forcing it.

I love Tickatus, because i‘m a Priest player. If he has it in his hand, i played it 3 times against him already xD and that happened 2 times only yesterday. I didnt count how often that worked all together. So although i play a super greedy priest deck, i never lost a single game against this card :D

But to be fair i can see, how it is annoying to other players.

Quote from OsirianTorus >>

#razadidnothingwrong. if you want to stop the oppression of that deck, change shadow reaper anduins hero power. someone like me who uses raza in odd priest appreciates 0 mana heal for 4 health on their hero power. dont punish the creative players because raza enables lazy combos based on shadow reapers broken shit hero power. change it to be usable twice in a turn instead of after every spell. thatll put a stop to it right quick

 I totally agree, i play raza in my priest too but with the quest hero power. I love its effect. The big problem is spawn of shadows. They can nerf that card to the ground. It makes the oppressive deck much weaker and the other raza versions would be untouched

I dont have the cards for it but it looks as weird as my p2w priest so i bet its a lot of fun! :) I love homebrews in general.

I can‘t speak for these players, but what annoys me is the fact, that so many players use aggro/face decks. So in a way it is the „stale meta“ for my vote. Of course the meta changes a little from a deck perspective, but not from a playstyle perspective.

Like i said, these kinds of games are made like that. Of course it‘s bs that you don‘t get everything for that amount of money but that‘s how it works. You cannot expect anything else from this system.

Like every f2p game where you can spend money on, it can be extremely expensive if you are willing to pay that much. Compare it to FIFA or any game like that. People are spending way too much on these games. 

But since you fall for it, they wont change the system. 230€?? I think you should learn how to manage your finances first, im sorry.

Quote from Shadowrisen >>

I love how people will insist they are correct in the face of irrefutable proof to the contrary.  You're trying to come at this ass backwards.  Does ETC trigger when a minion attacks after being given rush by broom?  Then obviously, that minion has rush for the purposes of ETC.  What other possible criteria could there be to settle the question?

Completely independent from the obvious FACT that ETC triggers from broom'ed minions, where in the world did we get the idea that the minions with "rush" printed in the card text make up a closed set of all minions that can ever be "rush minions"?  I mean, we certainly don't consider minions with a natural 5 attack of being the ONLY minions that can ever have 5 attack.  And yet, if a Devout Pupil gets Libram of Wisdom cast on it and subsequently is targeted by Shadow Word: Death, are you really going to be outraged that Devout Pupil isn't a REAL 5 or more attack creature.  It's an imposter!

 

Of course not.  This discussion is ridiculous.

 That's the percect answer for it!