There are more informations on gamepedia than on hearthpwn.
This isn't a great comment because it doesn't actually give us any feedback. What information displayed on there do you think we should include on card pages - everything isn't helpful, telling us nerf history would be is.
- Strategy : abilities : synergy with other card...etc
- Card availability : how to get the card, craft, promo, no more existent...etc
- Patch history
you know this kind of information, just take an example of this card:
It is up to the Gamepedia folks to add the links to HearthPwn which is why they are not present on some of our pages. No bug. I'd rather see people stay on HearthPwn anyway,
Actually the there are links on gamepedia to "hearthpwn" (:p) but not hearthpwn to gamepedia
0
Same as Barnes, it's a dumb card that have little to no counterplay.
0
0
2
This needs to be like 7 mana at least so they can't cube-pact on turn 6.
0
Thank you everyone ;)
0
0
0
Hi everyone, i just want to know if it is worth crafting Thrall knowing that Jade will rotate in April ?
0
0
0
Are they no more linked ? a lot of the cards doesn't have links to gamepedia but on gamepedia there are links to hearthpwn, is this just a bug ?
2
Hidden mechanic : deal 80% of the damage to you characters.
0
Thank you everyone.
0
Hi everyone,Is this quest card worth to craft even without N'Zoth ? planning to play on Standard or Wild, thank you.
1
And it will take Blizzard 6 month to balance a card until people have poured enough cash to play / counter the meta.