Jokes on you. At that point Warsong Commander didn't give charge to minions that were summoned by other minions making a Grim Patron deck pretty unplayable, so they were all pretty much correct.
Yup. The creator of that video and the OP of this thread are either mistaken or blatantly unaware of how retarded they are. Kudos ~
I agree there is tons of stupid in this thread, though not with the second part of your statement. Aggro is around and popular cause of what Wamts stated. Essentially if you are new stepping into the game now, aggro is your only choice if you want to try to climb the ladder. War Golems and Force tank maxes aren't really going to cut it.
It's not your only choice. You can play arena and farm pack + dust + gold + cards; however, if all you do is click a portrait, you're not going to learn any of the game mechanics that actually matter in arena. So you're just perpetuating your only cognitive ability to play face decks. When I first started playing, sure, I could have made an easy deck, but I played mage until I hit about rank 8~ish, and then I farmed arena averaging 7-8 wins until I had cards I wanted. I've been playing since beta and my hunter level is 19.
Glorified example of cancer not being your only choice.
There's so much stupid in 1 thread that it actually physically hurts.
BTW, there's a reason face hunter was banned 90% of the games played in seatstory cup 3, and its not because it takes skill. If you want to make an intelligent argument, attempt to incorporate realistic statistics.
Aggro decks are around because they can beat anything without thinking too hard, even to legend rank caliber. That's why the same players who try to use any deck besides aggro get shit on at that level. This is most notably true when one spectates players a lot.
Eh, I don't think aggro ruins hearthstone. I do think that a user of the archetype however has no room to make a sound argument about his or her skill level though, unless of course he or she also plays other archetypes to a degree which could be considered "good".
I would like to gather opinionated information from other players of high caliber to get a general feel for what other players of similar skill as I am think in terms of which tech cards and best class or classes are vs these two decks.
0
That's a good idea man.
What do you run differently than what is in OP's list?
Thx
4
How to get legend in current standard meta:
Step 1: Play 1 of the Cancer archetypes.
Step 2: ???
Step 3: Get legend and then struggle trying to play any other archetype while pretending you're one of the best players on ladder.
-9
Lul, "with proof", as if it takes more than 5 IQ and 100+ games to get legend with Zoo and face shaman archetypes. Lul.
0
Yup. The creator of that video and the OP of this thread are either mistaken or blatantly unaware of how retarded they are. Kudos ~
0
It's not your only choice. You can play arena and farm pack + dust + gold + cards; however, if all you do is click a portrait, you're not going to learn any of the game mechanics that actually matter in arena. So you're just perpetuating your only cognitive ability to play face decks. When I first started playing, sure, I could have made an easy deck, but I played mage until I hit about rank 8~ish, and then I farmed arena averaging 7-8 wins until I had cards I wanted. I've been playing since beta and my hunter level is 19.
Glorified example of cancer not being your only choice.
0
There's so much stupid in 1 thread that it actually physically hurts.
BTW, there's a reason face hunter was banned 90% of the games played in seatstory cup 3, and its not because it takes skill. If you want to make an intelligent argument, attempt to incorporate realistic statistics.
Aggro decks are around because they can beat anything without thinking too hard, even to legend rank caliber. That's why the same players who try to use any deck besides aggro get shit on at that level. This is most notably true when one spectates players a lot.
Eh, I don't think aggro ruins hearthstone. I do think that a user of the archetype however has no room to make a sound argument about his or her skill level though, unless of course he or she also plays other archetypes to a degree which could be considered "good".
0
This thread is asking what players use personally.
0
I wouldn't say 'counter'. I would say better than 50%; however, in my opinion priest is a bit weak at the moment.
0
You're correct. Sorry, its about 7am here lol. I would say around the rank 5 area.
0
I agree. Personally I like to go for a warrior or paladin build.
0
I would like to gather opinionated information from other players of high caliber to get a general feel for what other players of similar skill as I am think in terms of which tech cards and best class or classes are vs these two decks.
AND GO!
0
Danny is quite the entertaining streamer. He interacts well with his viewers. Come check it out!
http://www.twitch.tv/pokemondanny
0
Which version of Dark Paladin did you think had the best artwork?
2
Me.
Kappa.
0
mmmmm yummy yummy tears of sadness from Leeroy and Auctioneer nerfs.