Hearthpwn

About 20/30k people in most server. In China I think there are even more users who reach legend.

First time with miracle rogue back in MSOG meta. This season with... miracle rogue too.

Well, Iksar said that they're probably changing the way that brann and khadgar work together, so I think we'll have some news about it soon.

Considering that's an only mage tournament, most people would probably run Highlander Mage. It's a Value deck, so I would pick Kazakus over Reno Jackson.

I had the same problem. I reinstalled the client and now the game is working fine.

Nope, druid is worse.

BLIZZARD. FIX. YOUR. FUCKING. BUGS.

Birds battlecry draw a card?

Good Rag SMOrc

Gadgetzan Miracle Rogue.

**I'm in charge now**

When killinallday, bloodyface and hunterace are the names of three of the best players atm.

I voted HS when the poll was released, but I think Wizards did an amazing job with War of the Sparks, and Rise o Shadows, on the other hand, was a bit lame. I still main HS, but they should try harder next expansions.

Quote from DiamondDM13 >>

Quote from Jerolm >>

 Not exactly, warrior mirrors are a problem because doble elysiana can end up in a tie. Losing a fatigue game is ok, a bit frustrating but is what must happen, tie is a waste of time for both players, mostly because it means that there was nothing you could have done to win the game.

 Alternatively, you could see it as neither of you were able to outplay the opponent, you played both as well.

If you are playing the same strategy, in most games, there is a high likely hood of a draw happening. Hearthstone is not exactly the same because the game tends to play until the win condition is achieved, but it shouldn't be a strange concept, that two players playing the same strategy, that can end up tied.

It is frustrating, but both players decided to use that strategy. What surprises me the most is the willingness to ban a strategy you like just because you don't like what happens because of the fact that others can also choose to play the same strategy and you might end up in a mirror.

In other words, I would assume that if a player decided to play a strategy, they should enjoy it enough that they would be willing to face up a few ties, a few frustrating games, just to get the option to play the strategy they like.

This is even more important considering the strategy is already a long strategy to begin with, meaning I don't think people would really be playing it unless they really enjoyed it, which makes the willingness to ban it nonsensical to me.

 I'm not sure anybody likes bouncing elysiana, it's more like "I should run pandas or insta concede against warriors". One thing is, as you said, a long strategy. Endless strategys are not fun.

Don't missunderstood me, I like CW mirrors, I like long games, but when a long game turns out into a tie because you reach the limit is a problem. And is even more problematic when it comes to such a common strategy. 

Delaying fatigue is ok. But when it turns into a never ending stall is a problem for the game as itself, and of course it's a problem for competitive too.

Quote from DiamondDM13 >>

I'm not sure I understand what is being discussed here. Just to be clear, are you playing a Control deck with no clear Win Condition other than to exhaust the opponent out of resources, yet you are not happy when you find a mirror match because it goes on forever, because you cannot guarantee you are the one running the opponent out of resources?

I would say that is match length is a problem to you, it would probably be a good idea to use a different playstyle.

It almost sounds like, you like to play this strategy, but you don't like it when others play this strategy, and so, you think it's better if no one can play this strategy. Which brings the question, would you be saying anything if only you were playing this strategy? I highly doubt it, you just don't like it when others can do it too.

 Not exactly, warrior mirrors are a problem because doble elysiana can end up in a tie. Losing a fatigue game is ok, a bit frustrating but is what must happen, tie is a waste of time for both players, mostly because it means that there was nothing you could have done to win the game.

Quote from Shadowrisen >>

I bet you a preorder and 100 more packs that never happens in a pro-level event.

Worlds clearly shows how the warrior matchup can be trounced, and it never involves 3 Archivists.

 Actually it happened in APAC regionals 2017. Mirror DMH warrior (and live on stream). Now where are my packs?