• 0

    posted a message on Big hit for invested money (600 Euro plus)
    Quote from MalakyEx >>
    Quote from dinamar >>
    But that is just you asserting something without any basis.
    Never did they state that wild mode would receive "no love" regarding balancing. They actually very specifically said it would be receiving balance changes.
     We do actually, it's called history. As another user said: they couldn't balance ONE gamemode as it is now and had to resort to splitting it in two, what makes you think that they'll suddenly be able to balance BOTH Wild and Standard at the same time?
    About what they "specifically said", they also said that they wouldn't invalidate people's cards because they didn't want people to feel their collections became "worthless", which is exactly what they're doing now that Mama Money demands it.
     But if they couldn't balance one playmode (in your opinion), then everything stays the same anyway if they simply not balance it further (in your opinion)? Nothing changes. And you get a new mode to play called standard. Which they probably will also not balance (in your opinion).
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Big hit for invested money (600 Euro plus)

    I don't exactly know what you mean with "competetively". Are you running for Blizzard Points? In all other respects, wild format will be giving you equal rewards and it will be competetive to beat other players. As I said, I can understand that people who crafted golden cards are angry, but I do not see any rightful claim they have for full dusting value. For me, standard is just a new mode on top of the hearthstone I already know.

    And as to the reasons why they are going for a format, I posted my thoughts here.

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Big hit for invested money (600 Euro plus)

    Thing is, wild in Hearthstone will be cheaper than MTG T1. You do not need all GvG and Naxx Cards. You need at most 30 cards for a viable deck. And then you have a deck completely consisting of  wild cards. More likely that you don't need nearly that much. And the costs are fixed.

    As to the balancing, I do not think it will be such a major Task. I expect the new cards will have generally lower power than Naxx and GvG cards. Of course there will be cards that can break the meta in wild, but then they will nerf one of the combo-cards down. Probably the one that is only available in wild mode. Edit:  And then you should get your dust back.

    But yes, just favorite your own post and check it in a year who was right :)

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Big hit for invested money (600 Euro plus)
    Quote from Dekion1980 >>

    Ok, well I'm not that bothered to be fair. I've invested a lot in cards and expansions but I've got my moneys worth in game time that's for sure. It'll be a shame not to be able to use a lot of my favourite cards in standard but I like the idea of building new decks based new limitations. 

    Though I'm not sure how much fun std iwill be in the next expansion (2017) when they remove TGT, BRM and LoE. Surely the card pool will be extremely limited.  

     

     For every Expansion they cycle out, a new one cycles in. I expect them to keep the amount of cards on the present level. But if they omit all old cards and only add an adventure with 40 cards, then the card pool will be limited in the beginning of every year. So I think that they need to release an Expansion at first. But we will see.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Thank you Blizzard...
    Quote from Nais_One >>

    what? you can play in standard with your classic cards.. they will never be cut off

     "never" in the meaning of "as far as we know now" ... ;)
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Big hit for invested money (600 Euro plus)
    Quote from Dekion1980 >>

    First i've heard of this 'change', I'll go and try to find something on it now. 

    Just a question though. What incentive is there to play the new standard mode over wild mode?

    From what I"m reading here Wild mode corresponds to what exists now and people are assuming that cards won't be nerfed / buffed anymore (not that they really are anyway). 

    So what would make people switch to Standard and not play Wild anymore? Is there a difference in rewards / recognition?

     I guess a quicker changing meta? And all the pro-players and pro-streamers who want to participate on official tournaments will play standard, since you cannot earn Blizzard Points in wild mode (although you get all the monthly rewards). Oh yeah, and the most important point: Only your standard rank will be shown to your friends. So if you want to show off, you have to play Standard...
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Big hit for invested money (600 Euro plus)
    Quote from EpicAsdu >>

    You keep posting on forums being so sure that WILD mode will have some sort of consideration. 

    Guess what no one will care :) 

     You keep posting on forums being so sure that WILD mode will not be cared about.
    Guess what: Noone knows yet. So no need to complain beforehand since complaints will not change anything either.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place!
    Quote from Ketho >>

    That someone plays face hunter is one thing, that he needs to be toxic and bm is another thing 

    You genuinely wonder why he start's mocking you after you waited until the rope started burning without doing anything? you could have ended this at the beginning of your turn, but if you BM him, it's just natural that he will give back the courtesy.
    Edit: Okay, your edit explains it. And yes, some people are morons.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 5

    posted a message on Please, speak with your wallet !

    I absolutely agree. And I'll probably buy the expansion.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Big hit for invested money (600 Euro plus)

    Although I can understand people who get angry because they crafted golden cards which now can only be played in wild mode, I also understand that Blizzard cannot let everyone disentchant all Naxx and GvG Cards for free. They simply wouldn't sell new packs asince everyone just disentchants his shitty GvG and Naxx Cards and craft the viable ones from the next Expansion. Additionally, we simply get a new mode for which the older expansions are banned. That this affects the old mode as well may be bad luck, but in the end everyone can get everything in wild except for these blizzard-points. And (nearly) everyone who is seriously interested in the points is anyway appreciating Standard mode. I also have invested some triple digit sum of money into hearthstone. But simoultaneously, I will pre-order the new expansion and do the rest with buying card packs with gold and crafting necessities as I did until now.

    Under the assumption that Hearthstone needs change to stop the game from getting boring, Blizzard has only three ways to go:

    1. Keep everything as it is now and avoid power creep.

    Maybe nerf some single cards like MC, Shredder and Dr. Boom, but that would not shake up the meta. The new expansion comes, a few new cards will be included in older decks (e.g. Justicar from TGT in CW) and maybe a new deck is generated (secret Paladin, although MC was power creep for Paladin). However, eventually the meta will be stale and a new expansion will only generate slight meta changes if at all. Most people will not have to buy expansions since they will be able to craft the necessary cards easily. -> Less money for Blizzard and probably the game will die sooner or later.

    2. Start power creeping the expansions.

    This will shake up the meta with every new expansion. Furthermore they do not have to care about nerfing stronger minions, because even Shredder and Dr. Boom will eventually meet their demise in shape of a new 4 and 7 mana powerhouse, respectively. People will have to buy packs, the viable decks will Change a lot and will also get stronger and stronger. Eventually, the early game of the new Zoo will be able to compete with the late game of Handlock and beat it with value ;)

    3. Start cycle out whole expansions (no need for power creep).

    The meta will regularly change pretty unforseeable. Old decks will be changed from slightly to a lot or will die completely, new decks with completely new ideas will arise (noone knows if after the next expansion an inspire deck will become viable). People will have to buy packs if they want to play Standard, but if they play wild, they probably only need to craft some core cards of the new expansion (although adventures still have to be bought)

    In conlusion, I prefer the third option. I also think that wild will end up as something between 1. and 2., i.e. big parts of the expansions will not affect wild mode since the presently available cards will probably be around the same power Level (or even better in case of Shredder and Dr. Boom). Howver, it will happen that a combination of new and old cards will combine to a new top Tier deck as the secrets did with MC. However, I also guess that People will eventually cope with such new decks, as they did with secret Pally (despite secret Pally is still there, the present meta is pretty diverse). Occasionally it will happen that a Combo will break wild mode, but I expect Blizzard to fix such a card quick enough. I don't think they can afford a completely broken wild mode if enough people are still playing it (because also wild mode players will be customers).

    But of course, that's only what I expect and what sounds Logical to me. I do not know for sure.

     Edit: TL;DR: In my opinion Blizzard took the best Option to keep the game fresh. And there are no signs to be concerned about teh short-term playability of wild mode.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Golden GVG cards
    Quote from Tahladnas >>
    Quote from Foodslayer >>
    Quote from Tahladnas >>
    Quote from Foodslayer >>

    I can't ask the community if i'm already tired from studying?

    Maybe you never studied, try it and read something after it -,-

     

     Do we look like we care about what you've been doing prior to opening a useless thread?
     

    Meanwhile has a own post, with saying he got 3 golden portraits. 

    Dont judge if you have useless threads please. :S

    Look at this sentence when you are not longer blind for your own actions.

     At least i'm not asking questions that were asked a million times, which answers can be found in the FAQ.
    Use the search function.
    By the way, please go back to studying. Your grammar is giving me a headache.
     But you care enough to comment multiple times in a thread you called "useless" and fill it with off-topic BS. Better care about your own shit and let people answer his questions if they want to.
    Edit: here is one of the FAQs
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on What deck you prepare for Standard?
    Quote from Rak5hasa >>

    What about Lightbomb? I don't see much success without that.

     I guess you meant my post?
    Main purpose of lightbomb was (for me) another removal for Dr. Boom (besides the powerword: Death). And he is gone with lightbomb. Against aggro, Excavated Evil will do similar well and I also use two Holy Nova. And I can use a second Entomb. So Lightbomb seems replaceable for me. But yes, I might be incorrect and I will miss Lightbomb. I will see.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on What deck you prepare for Standard?

    I surely will give Dragon Priest a try. I mean, the deck works at present and only few cards will cycle out of which only Velen's Chosen has no proper replacement at present. But I am eager to see the new cards and maybe a midrange beast-Druid or -hunter will be a thing.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Dragon players! Is now our time to rule the roost?
    Quote from JEndymion >>

    So you didn't have Velen's ChosenDark Cultist, or Lightbomb in your dragon priest deck?

     I have 2 Velen's and 1 Lightbomb in the deck. No Dark Cultist (imho Blackwing Technician works anyway better) and no Vol'jin either. It's sad to lose the buff, but maybe there will be a proper replacement in the new expansion, or I find two good three drops for it. I had Lightbomb mainly against Dr. Boom, but he follows Lightbomb. And with Excavated Evil there is another AoE against aggro. And of course, I can include a second Entomb as well. In conclusion, I think that Dragon decks could be Tier 1 or Tier 2 decks (until BRM cycles out), depending on the new cards that will be added.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 5

    posted a message on Hearthpwn users be like

    All pretty correct. But you forgot about one of the most pathetic Babyrages:

    BabyRage People complain about things BabyRage

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.