I will go against the grain and say you can dust them all, with Shaku being your highest priority if you value maintaining a collection. If you don't care about collecting cards, dust all of them saving Shaku until you are absolutely sure about not wanting to play rogue. Out of all those cards, shaku is the only one that sees play in good decks.
A. Board interactions and hand interactions are not the same thing, so get the Aldor Peacekeeper reasoning out of here.
B. You cards cost 5 is easy to understand. Cards should cost 5. Changing for the sake of making it somehow easier to understand is the dumbest excuse I have ever heard.
C. Bright eyed scout is a battlecry, Naga is an aura. There is no reason the BES should have any effect on how naga works.
It's for the best. Losing on turn one should never be a thing in any game. The fact that blizzard left it alone as long as they did is mindblowing. How can a dev be so incompetent as to think that is a fun experience for anyone?
Oh give me a fucking break. Go play a different game. "I lost, please nerf!" You are a real life meme. Is that a patriots avatar you have? Can't tell because I am on my phone, but if it is, it suits you well brah.
Warrior as dead as paladin? You mean the same paladin that is like tier 1 right now? What are you smoking? What deck is blood razor replacing war axe? Pirates? Control warrior is already dead with a 2 mana waraxe and deadman has already cut waraxe.
Why wouldn't people who just want waraxe, run waraxe? Why would a warrior deck that doesn't care about whirlwind pay more mana for a blood razor? I swear, the threads on this site are baffling in their logic and reasoning.
No. Vicious Fledgling is an average to mediocre turn three play. Other aggro decks already exist you know and they aren't running VF, including token shaman. It is only strong if it lands an attack, and even then you have to high roll the right buffs to keep it alive a second round. This almost never happen if it hits the board on turn 3. Hell, it saw some light play in hunter, a class known for beast synergy and it failed to be a mainstay. Without innervate I say VF sees no play.
No. There are only two deck types in the game. The overpowered one everyone else plays and the cool hipster underpowered deck I play. The meta would be SO much better if my underpowered deck was winning all the time against the overpowered deck.
And you are like the 1000th guy to make this thread in the last week. Get over it or stop playing. It is what it is and nobody is denying it. Stop being a baby over a card game.
0
I will go against the grain and say you can dust them all, with Shaku being your highest priority if you value maintaining a collection. If you don't care about collecting cards, dust all of them saving Shaku until you are absolutely sure about not wanting to play rogue. Out of all those cards, shaku is the only one that sees play in good decks.
6
2
I understand the points but I disagree with them.
A. Board interactions and hand interactions are not the same thing, so get the Aldor Peacekeeper reasoning out of here.
B. You cards cost 5 is easy to understand. Cards should cost 5. Changing for the sake of making it somehow easier to understand is the dumbest excuse I have ever heard.
C. Bright eyed scout is a battlecry, Naga is an aura. There is no reason the BES should have any effect on how naga works.
0
It's for the best. Losing on turn one should never be a thing in any game. The fact that blizzard left it alone as long as they did is mindblowing. How can a dev be so incompetent as to think that is a fun experience for anyone?
11
Oh give me a fucking break. Go play a different game. "I lost, please nerf!" You are a real life meme. Is that a patriots avatar you have? Can't tell because I am on my phone, but if it is, it suits you well brah.
5
Warrior as dead as paladin? You mean the same paladin that is like tier 1 right now? What are you smoking? What deck is blood razor replacing war axe? Pirates? Control warrior is already dead with a 2 mana waraxe and deadman has already cut waraxe.
Why wouldn't people who just want waraxe, run waraxe? Why would a warrior deck that doesn't care about whirlwind pay more mana for a blood razor? I swear, the threads on this site are baffling in their logic and reasoning.
2
0
They gotta take those easy wins while they can before innervate and waraxe are balanced.
0
Priest loses handidly to mill decks, and if priest is ever greedy enough to beat mill decks, it will get obliterated by turn 4 in aggro matches.
0
No. Vicious Fledgling is an average to mediocre turn three play. Other aggro decks already exist you know and they aren't running VF, including token shaman. It is only strong if it lands an attack, and even then you have to high roll the right buffs to keep it alive a second round. This almost never happen if it hits the board on turn 3. Hell, it saw some light play in hunter, a class known for beast synergy and it failed to be a mainstay. Without innervate I say VF sees no play.
6
What the fuck is the point of running two cards that drastically change the hero power? Awful deck.
0
No. There are only two deck types in the game. The overpowered one everyone else plays and the cool hipster underpowered deck I play. The meta would be SO much better if my underpowered deck was winning all the time against the overpowered deck.
1
It's fine. I don't hate aggro. I hate decks that are easy to win with. Pirate warrior, jade druid, aggro druid etc.
0
Safe to disenchant all 3.
0
And you are like the 1000th guy to make this thread in the last week. Get over it or stop playing. It is what it is and nobody is denying it. Stop being a baby over a card game.