Hearthpwn

Quote from booganzoth >>

To me, playing Mill as your win condition is like winning on a technicality.

It's maybe one step above hacking into your opponent's network so you win by default because of a disconnect.

Not that I mind when my opponent burns cards because of a full hand.  

But to construct a deck around running them in to fatigue - while technically legal I guess - just does not seem gratifying to me.

Quote from MandelbrotorblednaM >>

Good call, guys.  You got it bang on.  

This type of thing is EXACTLY why 95% of the posters on here have not an inch to complain about what Blizzard does....because you have ZERO clue.  ZERO.

 

Beat it with an autofill rogue deck. Played against a shaman who refused to trade his stormaxe for my fairy dragon and he was subsequently beaten to death with it. Such a dumb brawl.

Quote from byzants >>

 

Intereresting, though I don't really agree on the armorsmiths. If you only gain "2-3" armor with them, it sounds as though you use them fairly ineffectively?

Anyways, what warrior desperately needs is a strong and effective value card. If we get that, I think control warrior / fatigue warrior can be in a good spot. I don't think it will happen, I think Blizz will push tempo warrior.

 

Nah. I like how you completely lie about rogue having any efficient board clears and try to by pass it almost entirely by saying "tempo bro!" Just to push your bullshit propaganda about hunter being treated unfairly. Hunter has many psuedo board clears, more than paladin and rogue. Get over it. You have Poison Abom, you have rexxar, you have explosive, you have unleash, you have bloating bat. Even more options in wild. But vanish though, give me a fucking break.

Quote from ser_pounce >>

A lot of the pre nerf bitching had to do with how razakus priest would be over powered and jade druid would still be overpowered. Initial stats have the 2 decks at 50%, far behind the likes of midrange hunter and token shaman  https://www.vicioussyndicate.com/data-reaper-live-beta/?utm_source=main-nav&utm_medium=link

Xcom Enemy Within runs pretty well on my android devices. So I would say that is.

Chillwind Yeti is bottom of the barrel card but fine enough for replacing Sherazin in that deck imo. With that being bottom of the barrel, I am sure you have better options. Take your pick.

 It is interesting to read but I don't think it means much. The majority of that post also applies to every english speaking person that I have seen complain about Hearthstone in the past few weeks. It's useless. Blizzard is doing what they are doing for their own reasons like they always have and for the most part, every balance change they made was long time coming. You can be disappointed with the reasoning they gave or not hitting druid hard enough, but it's whatever at this point. Chinese, russian, english. It's all the same complaints. 

I think he is actually worse than Bonemare. Amazing how theses idiots can overvalue Hancho so much but allow a card like jade idol to slip through unchecked.

Quote from hoernsen >>

Your absolutely right. I play on EU, but recently started new on NA. As a f2p Player i have one Deck and it's definitely not a good one. But i continuously play against Players with golden Heroes, against God Decks and that at Rank 20. How is that even possible? I think they should rework the match making, that's not fun at all. My Kids are also new at Hearthstone and they have the same experience. 

Exodia mage should have never been made. Much like Jade idol. It single handidly crushes an archetype. 

Rogue needs more trolls. Prep and Blade flurry have some of my favorite art in the game. Would love to see Blizz drop the pirate tribe for rogue and give them trolls. Same with giving druod treants.

No. The game actually has an extreme amount of depth to it regarding strategy. It's what seperates solid-good-exceptional players. I can't tell you how many times I have seen legend players make obvious misplays, but then I watch a player like Kolento find lethal with what looks like an impossible play. Sure people like to bring rng up when we talk about skill in HS, but I will rebuttal with the fact that skill effects that area of the game too.

The problem with hearthstone isn't it's simplicity, it's Blizzard. For them, if people aren't playing new cards, then they blame old cards rather than reevaluating how they are balancing new cards. Instead of creating good interesting cards for every class, they force gimmick archtypes on us. Throw in a bunch of unplayable neutral minions. Allow new cards that are broken to stay broken because "they will rotate someday and new cards are exciting". Ancient of Lore nerf is a perfect example of this mentality. A rather fair way to draw or heal is obliterated. Meanwhile UI isn't seens as a problem.

Blizzard can't balance hearthstone and the closest they ever got was with Un'goro. An expansion they admit that they were surprised to see balanced. Until they change how they develop this game, it is doomed to continue on the path it has always been on. An unfair, unfun mess that people keep coming back to out love for the big flashy animations, easy to use interface, new mechanics and occasional fun game they have during the excitement of a new expansion.