• 3

    posted a message on No refund for Tess

    Card refunds where you have to exchange the card you paid for to receive an equal amount of dust is free stuff and card changes that drastically alter how you can play a card aren't nerfs. Sure okay pal.

    Kaladin, did you choose that name or did Blizzard? We have a regular Theon Greyjoy in here, or should I say, Reek. You are arguing against options for the player base, aka yourself. You need to do some soul searching bud, only the most pathetic of fanboys do a company's bidding without being paid. 

    You argue for Blizzard's integrity and yet you ignore the fact that not giving refunds for card changes no matter how technical is a new thing that began with Shudderwock. Remember Dreadsteed? That card was changed due to future interactions and had nothing to do with the power level of the card itself but we got a refund. The Yogg nerf is word for word the same as the Tess nerf and we got a refund for that. We even have evidence that Tess' original design was intentional but Blizzard put it under bug fixes. Why is that? How can a design choice suddenly be a bug?

    Whether a card is changed fundamentally or technically, the point of refunds is to allow you a chance to change your mind because Blizzard has changed theirs. You want to argue for integrity? How about you show a little bit of your own. All I see is a groveling fanboy who would gladly lick the boots of their master.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on No refund for Tess
    Quote from Kaladin >>
    Quote from jeepers1704 >>
    Quote from Kaladin >>

    It's not a nerf, and you don't deserve free dust for it. 

    "Deserve" doesn't enter into it. Blizzard will either refund or not based on their business interests. If there's enough outcry/voting with your wallet it might change their mind, similar the the DK Rexxar beast change. But you certainly aren't the arbiter of who gets refunds.

     Thank God Blizzard doesn't just give out free dust if the community whines loudly enough.  

     Hold up, while everyone else argues about how this is a nerf, let me deflate this bullshit argument right here.  How exactly is Tess Greymane's refund free? I mean the word refund is right there. That is what people want. If someone buys a toaster at Walmart that isn't as advertised, or suddenly stops working and they go to return it, do you argue that the money/ replacement is free? Explain yourself fool.

    Whether is was dust, gold, time or money. People had to pay for Tess Greymane and they have to disenchant her to receive the dust, so how exactly would a refund be free? 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 16

    posted a message on Defile is OP... Nerf! AGHHHHHHHHHH

    Cry a fucking river bro. This place is unbearable with all these whining threads.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Top 5 Problematic Hearthstone cards

    Vilespine? Someone is salty. I don't think a single one of those cards is problematic except Ice Block because it breaks the general rule of secrets. Which is that intuitive counterplay should allow you to beat them. You could change Ice Block to no longer being a secret and have words over the hero saying "YOUR OPPONENT HAS ICE BLOCK!" and it would still see play. That imo is problematic.

    The other cards might annoy you, but you can play around them if you are a good player. Not Ice Block though. You either player Eater or you don't.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 1

    posted a message on Prince Keleseth - Everywhere?

    The keleseth rogue is very strong thanks to shadowstep and rogues natural ability to out tempo opponentes. Can't say the same for any of the other decks trying it though. For decks like Pirate warrior, zoo and handbuff it just feels like an attempt to be viable rather than having good synergy. Any terrible deck will fair better if all the minions in have +1/+1.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Is the priest Meta changing in the next few days?

    Nope. Priest is the meta. Just as we predicted. I recommend crafting a cheap jade druid deck if you want to stay relevant. It is unlikely to change until December.

    Posted in: Priest
  • 3

    posted a message on 64 health to 0 in a single turn. Is this a thing now?

    People play that deck to beat priest and jade druid. Glad to see it working.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 5

    posted a message on The reason why the existence of Aggro is essential

    Pointless thread. You have reconciled your hate/ appreciation for aggro. Good for you. Aggro can be healthy, turn 4 lethal is not. Sorry. Something like murloc pally where you have to play smart to avoid losing all of your resources is good for the game. Something like old pirates that demands you run specific tech cards and draw them on time or you get blown out is cancer. Then again, I think you feel that people only hate aggro. Many also hate control, midrange etc. Anything that wins is cancer to some. Just how it is. Like I said. Pointless thread.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on How hard is it to reach Rank 5?

    It's fairly easy. Just don't stress out about it. You will get there. Rank 5 to legend is the real challenge.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 1

    posted a message on Most annoying meme & RNG deck I could think of.

    That is a good Meme, but not much support for this deck. I will probably get the doomsayer all the time. lol

     No, you see the annoying part comes from high rolling with barnes on something like confessor. This deck without barnes is a joke itself. 
    Also, I knew this would be a priest deck before I even clicked on the thread.
    Posted in: Priest
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.