Hearthpwn

me:  "Honey im gonna spend $50 on pre-order for Hearthstone, you know my card game"

girlfriend:  "Wow, ok why do you spend so much time and money on that stupid game?...nerd >.>"

me:  "Well it is a cheaper hobby than strips clubs you know? ^.^"

girlfriend:  "Enjoy your nerd time honey :) "

10/10 ENTERTAINMENT VALUE! 

F**kING HILARIOUS!

They should make a card back reward for reaching legend with a Standard deck in Wild....where is that option here

Turn 1:  Idol > Discover:  Saraad > innervate > innervate > coin > /play Saraad on turn 1 

opponent:  /conceed

 /loot dust

Ramp breaks this brawl nicely

Turn 1:  Idol > Discover: Saraad > innervate > innervate > coin > /play Saraad on turn 1 

opponent:  /conceed

Ramp breaks this brawl nicely

I would consider dropping Gorehowl, acolyte, Grom, possibly Revenge.... for another slam, healbot, armorsmith, or tournament medic.  I think these would help vs aggro (secret pally/zoo) to get you into the midgame.

Gorehowl and Grom are too slow vs those decks and I would take a slam over a second acolyte for the draw and 2dmg vs aggro.  They are good in late game but you will have Elise to lean on so it shouldnt be too much of a loss.  

Armorsmith's 4 health is nice early vs secret and zoo while allowing some defense and armor.  

Healbot can get you into turn 6 where you can drop your Shieldmaiden and start to stabalize.  

Tournament medic will most likely need to be silenced with 8 health and can double your return from armoring up.  

Good luck vs those decks, 50% win rate would be a success IMO!

Wouldnt have mattered much, but you could also have pinged Gromm to activate the enrage with your shadow hero power in game # 1.

Nice Vid!

Quote from Geiski >>

Quote from ThisWasTheOnlyUsernameAvailable >>

To quote Kolento, "If I have lethal, I kill him. If I don't have lethal, I cannot kill him.".

If opponent has 1 hp and I can do 457 damage, I don't. I don't play anything other than what I have to in order to kill him as quickly as possible. It's unnecessary.

 Kolento the philosopher, let's all jump on the bandwagon and call his opinion the right one.

I simply disagree and I don't see it as bm, just because you don't like it doesnt mean it's a display of bad manners. Since this is a card game with a closed hand and rng elements I myself am just curious what the rng would have brought me for one. Same goes for the opponents rng. Just like in poker when your opponent bluffs or wins with closed hand, I would be very eager to know what he had and what my chances were if I made a different choise. It's the same reason why I would use burgle/portal/draw cards to see what cards I would gain next turn. It's the same reason why I would last hit an opponents loot hoarder, so the freeze mage would know if he would have gotten the card he needed so badly. It's my curiosity. If you consider my curiosity to be BM, than I would feel very sorry for you, because you d come of as a butthurt person.

Same goes for showing if I have 100k dmg in hand. I would like to show my opponent that even though he made a certain choise, this would be my full potential, as a result he will now know if another choise would have affected the game. How is my choise of showing him my hand bm, while infact I could contribute to his development as a HS-gamer since he now has the ability to evaluate his own choises.

But let's get back to your kolento quote. His quote also implies that he has a choise and makes use of that because HE and nobody else has that choise. Same goes for my 'bm' of showing my hand and the top of my/my opponents deck. When I have the ability to show different outcomes of the game, I will show the different outcomes and disclose my hand/deck, If i don't have that ability I dont.

 

PS. I consider netdecking to be BM, since you have a negative effect on my gaming experience. I know all the possible cards you could use in the following turns because I know your deck. Nothing feeds my curious nature, while on the other hand when I show different outcomes I contribute to your experience by, for example, showing you my brann + ancient mage combo

is Aviana a must? Replacement?

Maybe priests are taking it out of lack of options from Curator Discovery?

I think the player would need to get some sort of bonus for playing a certain amount of the spec cards...Like if you have 8 shadow priest cards in your deck then your shadow hero power deals more damage or something.  Your idea is quite specific, I am thinking more generally I suppose. Some neutral cards could count toward any specs also for the bonus also

Thoughts?.

Those decks are pretty challenging for a CW, I do better with Patron Warrior vs those decks.  If you arent dead set on CW then I would patron a shot (only 2 seasons left for Deaths Bite)! 

Blizz loves to recycle, this is the "World of Warcraft: Cataclysm" expansion of Hearthstone possibly

Quote from kejer >>

Quote from Deuce >>

battlecry before deathrattle I believe

 Trolden is sad.

battlecry before deathrattle I believe