Hearthpwn

Reee new card in deck. Me no like card I see many time.

Insert Acidic Swamp Ooze here.

Because the meta isn't even a month old and people already want nerfs.

Aggro decks will ALWAYS have inflated win percentages when people are experimenting with unoptimized decks. We need more data before a certain deck can be demonized as overpowered.

Dude, your original "argument" is just a complaint with no reasoning behind it. Not this thread's fault you don't understand the very basic concept that control beats aggro.

It's all variance, my dude. Personally been having amazing luck with 7 legendary pulls from ~50 assorted packs (maybe my pity timer was close for a bunch of sets?).

Quote from ddang >>

This is the problem with women in the "work"place. Cutesy fun (over)socialization, Product Suffers.

Honestly may quit playing, now knowing this is how Blizz is spending resources.

 Yes, because it costs so much to ask employees for a picture of their pet.

TLDR on this thread:

RRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Reply.

Quote from Live4vrRdieTryn >>

Quote from Ythiel >>

My personal idea would be to have a personalized banlist - e.g. every player has somewhere between 5 to 10 bans. You pick some cards you hate to play against / are too strong / unbalanced etc. and when you go to play the matchmaking system will not match you against anybody who has one or more of the banned cards in their deck. This will result in you having better experience and also players who want to play toxic decks will have much bigger waiting times in queue, probably resulting in them being forced to play the "regular" unrestricted wild format where they will face other toxic decks.

Also, you cannot play yourself card thats on your banlist (no hypocrites allowed).

If such a system was introduced my bans would probably look like this:

1. Barnes
2. Genn Greymane
3. Baku the Mooneater
4. Bloodreaver Gul'dan
5. Kingsbane

additional bans if more than 5 were allowed:

6. Lesser Emerald Spellstone
7. Muster for Battle
8. Archmage Antonidas
9. Jade Idol
10. Prince Keleseth

As you can see, if the amount of bans was only like 5, there still would be plenty of room for matchmaking to work, but you could at least ban the 5 most toxic things you personally hate. If it were more than 5 bans, you could potentially hit a lot more decks, but it might resulHere's an idea I can get behind.
What a lot of the bashers aren't hearing is that I'm not just arguing that I WANT this, but it's a good possibility it will actually happen. There's a lot of players who really don't want to face Big Priest over and over again and when a lot of favorite cards rotate to wild combined with all of the lackluster cards they've released in the last 3, a lot of people are going to want to play their favorite decks at the only place they can... and they don't want to get devastated. It equals $'s and it's just the right thing to do for your fanbase.
I would expect something game-changing like this gentleman's idea or mine to eventually happen.t in players using the bans to remove "bad matchups", which is really not the intended idea, so maybe 5 would be enough.

 Here's an idea I can get behind.

What a lot of the bashers aren't hearing is that I'm not just arguing that I WANT this, but it's a good possibility it will actually happen. There's a lot of players who really don't want to face Big Priest over and over again and when a lot of favorite cards rotate to wild combined with all of the lackluster cards they've released in the last 3, a lot of people are going to want to play their favorite decks at the only place they can... and they don't want to get devastated. It equals $'s and it's just the right thing to do for your fanbase.

To reiterate for the hard-of-hearing, I was arguing that if Barnes is winning 58% of games when drawn, in a certain meta it would be drawn at a lower rate. You'd still get your ass kicked by it regularly, but not in an abusive way as I feel it is now. I would expect something game-changing like this gentleman's idea or mine to eventually happen.

 Once again, you're just looking for people to agree with you. The majority of the posters here aren't hard of hearing, they just think your idea is trash.

It's a good idea and you know it. Typical disagree with anything attitude this website is famous for...

 Lol you seem to be the one with the attitude. Take some criticism; if you only want people to agree with you, then talk to a mirror.

Big Priest complain-post #86532.

In swedish, Anka literally means Duck. Duck, the Buried. It's all I'm gonna think about whenever this card is played. Quack quack.

Quote from hillandder >>

Quote from Nakerino >>

Yes, it is definitely time. I mean it is almost a couple of hours since release. I am shocked he is not hall of fame'd yet.

 I hope is just a wrong first impression and the card will be ok, but the same feel of Patches and Creeper in every deck is there...

 gee do you think it''s in every deck MAYBE because it's the >>>new<<<< card and people want to play with it??, did that thought ever cross your  mind??

Yes, it is definitely time. I mean it is almost a couple of hours since release. I am shocked he is not hall of fame'd yet.

Quote from Bardles >>

Because the meta isn't even a month old and people already want nerfs.

Aggro decks will ALWAYS have inflated win percentages when people are experimenting with unoptimized decks. We need more data before a certain deck can be demonized as overpowered.

 

 THIS. THIS. ANNNND THIS.

because it has clear and strong counters in the meta. therefore there's nothing wrong with it. 

it would only be a problem, if it couldn't be countered. there are a few very strong counters to it at moment.

Mech Paladin and Carpet Zoo being the most obvious. 

is token druid nuts? yes.

is there a way to nerf it? nope.

is the meta full of token druids, murloc shamans, tempo rogues? yes.

is there enough board clears? no.

should you wait for the next expansion? yes.

is this a salt thread? no.

am i high? yes.

should you be reading this? no.

It is too close to the launch of the expansion, I think a lot of people are holding judgement until the meta settles. Blizzard have improved when it comes to churning out more regular patches, so I wouldn't be surprised if we do get one in a few weeks.