Hearthpwn

No question it's Cho'Gall in the picture, but I'd be disappointed if this artwork was for the legendary and not some sort of spell.

I've played guitar for 10 years and drums for 7, not much formal training for either though. I tour frequently so what really got me into Hearthstone was the mobile release so I could play it on drives.

"Nearly 50 WOG cards revealed and no Dr. Boom replacement, the game's best card, why?"

Expansions should have their own flavor, not piggyback the best parts of previous ones.

Fatigue warrior is a thing, so putting in Deathlord makes sense because it's a fatigue-oriented card. I personally think they're a little counterproductive in a genuine CW so I never run them. It seems like it replaced Armorsmith in that list too which confuses me even more.

My favorite part of playing dragon priest is my least favorite part about playing against it. Strong early curve and a lot of versatility for mid/late responses. Control priest is a massive pain as well, you feel like everything you throw on the board is going to be taken or cleared at any time.

Quote from fathom81 >>

Quote from Koncheetah >>

I'm sure so hyped Cho'Gall will be a spell and not a legendary minion. Legendaries in Hearthstone usually have another style of art.

For example I'd say THAT will be a legendary:

 

 maybe the mantid empress?

http://wow.gamepedia.com/Grand_Empress_Shek'zeer

There's a ton of rogue control decks what are you talking about? Miracle lets you control when you want to draw your entire deck, oil lets you control what turn you want to do 30 damage to the enemy hero, and mill lets you control how many of their own cards your opponent gets to destroy.

Wow this dies to any hard removal and Paladins can just Blessing of Might/Kings+BGH what a terrible card

Quote from Exacerberus >

Yes, particularly the removal/fatigue list is more effective and consistent.

I guess I forgot to specify that I'm actually doing a Reno Warrior and not a true CW (slipped my mind). Is straight CW more viable than Reno Control currently? If so I'll start throwing in duplicates of Brawl and Revenge and try out Abom to see how that handles things.

I tried replacing BG with Ragnaros in my CW since I don't have the former and I'm starting to really hurt from the lack of AOE. Is BG worth crafting now or would something like Abomination be an ok replacement in the meantime? I just don't wanna waste my dust on the legendary if it isn't worth it in the long run.

EDIT: Playing Reno Control instead of straight CW. May switch over though.

Quote from Garlicnerd >>

Yes it works as intended, yes that happens with Ancient Curse too.

It also works like that with Burrowing Mine.

I'm hoping to see Lock and Load see more play.

It's obvious the meta will be getting weaker/slower with Naxx and GVG rotating out, which means that previously unviable cards have a chance to shine. This brings me to a card I've always thought was really interesting - Beneath the Grounds

Do you think the meta will slow down enough to make this a viable Rogue archetype? It's an interesting twist on mill rogue that I think really deserves a chance to shine. The only issue is a potential bug/flaw is where I've seen a Nerubian destroyed because the opponent's hand was full, which would kill my hopes of this deck working entirely if it's "working as intended". (Sidenote - does this happen with cards like Ancient Curse too?)

What existing cards do you hope a slower/weaker meta brings into the spotlight?

why are people surprised when a business does something to make money

Because Zoo needs another charge finisher.