• 2

    posted a message on Facehunter, a lament and a commentary on today's game state

    You're not wrong in any way, the aggressive decks that we have today are far to strong - Even the ''old'' Facer Hunter (it actually still exist in wild) required more skill than for example Aggro Shaman to play.  :)

    I know because i play pretty much all archtypes, and I've played both Face Shaman and Face Hunter recently and the Hunter takes a bit more to play perfectly (only a bit though) - also it get's destroyed by Patron Warrior  :D


    I actually think that the ''old'' Face Hunter is the best aggro deck that we've ever had for the game. (not saying i don't hate losing to it)
    Back in Undertaker days it was too op though - it was just as dumb as Shaman is now...

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Never going to be legend

    I started in season 16 and i have reached legend multiple times  (i don't play all that much anymore though, got tired of all the rng and now i play another cardgame which atm is better and only play hs for funzies)

    The truth about getting to legend is that it's just a REALLY long grind, you will make it if you play enough as long as ur winrate is above 50%
    If you're just in for the pack you should play wild though, it's much easier in the low ranks and as everyone plays secret paladin you just have to counter that..  :D
    If you choose to play in standard you should play Aggro Shaman btw, it's VERY fast at getting ranks because of the length of the games...

    (Good Luck Climbing! Also if you're on EU i can add you and spectate you if you're up for it.)   :)

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 2

    posted a message on Cancer Dragon Priest

    Why is there no Wyrmrest Agent in there? - It's litterally one of the strongest Dragon cards in game...  Also where's Twilight Guardian?   :D
    Other than great deck  ^^

    Posted in: Cancer Dragon Priest
  • 2

    posted a message on Spoiler - How to unlock Tyrande

    Plottwist: It's a reward you get for winning with Priest - That's why no one has it.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Need help with ranked

    You can get to rank 15 with any deck that is tier 3 or above.....

    The best classes to make cheap decks in are: Mage, Warrior, Hunter, Shaman and Warlock (zoo warlock that is)

    I would recommend a Hybrid Hunter, it's easy to play and it has fairly fast games.
    If you wanna learn stuff about the game while playing you should go for ZooLock though.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 1

    posted a message on Rant about current meta and new cards (long overdue)

    Yogg-Saron literally just replaces the concede button with a roulette machine.

    I think the card has a cool design and i can understand why some people like to play with it - It should just be banned from the competitive part of the game, as it pretty much makes that look like a joke.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Can anybody tell why this deck doesn't work?

    It's not Face Shaman, Tempo Mage, Yogg Druid or Warrior. That's what's wrong with it.

    Posted in: Paladin
  • 7

    posted a message on I would love to see someone defend Yogg-Saron in competitive play after seeing this video

    Yogg-Saron literally just replaces the concede button with a roulette machine.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 5

    posted a message on I would love to see someone defend Yogg-Saron in competitive play after seeing this video

    You can't defend Yogg.
    Only the people who plays him will defend him, it's just like people saying ''pre-nerf patron wasn't op'' - only the people who played it ever said that.


    Also the card makes competitive E-sports look like a joke.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 4

    posted a message on Doomsday Clock
    Quote from kiwifocus >>

    can we have a doomsday clock set up for how much longer we put up with all these goddamn whiny shitposts?  we have a salty thread for a reason.  i post there daily.  you should try it too, op because this shit right here is not constructive in the slightest.

     1. Is there something wrong with wanting to known how other people find the game?  Like wth...

    2. Your comment ain't the slightest constructive either...
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.