• 5

    posted a message on The Haunted Carousel is This Week's Tavern Brawl

    This brawl smells like poo.

    Posted in: News
  • 3

    posted a message on Time for non-meta play mode!

    The thing I like most about Hearthstone is creating and finetuning decks. I've been doing it for years. The problem is Hearthstone in it's current shape actually discourages creating decks. Sure, at first glance, you're invited to do so. The discouragement starts after hitting play. Without exaggerating, 95% of all my matchups with self created decks are against pure meta decks. The stuff you find on hsreplay with the highest win ratings. So after I've started my third game and I realize on turn two that it's going to be another completely one-sided match, I give up. I've got quests to complete, so I copy a deck from hsreplay and play it like a drone. Yuck. Soul crushing business. Almost feels like I'm at work. Not a feeling one should have when playing a game.

    I find myself browsing my collection less and less after a new set comes out, let alone try and create a new deck. Instead, more and more days are just about clearing my quest log. That is not what is going to keep me coming back to Hearthstone. I can't imagine I'm the only one. Any game developer knows that you have to make people keep on coming back to your game in order to make money. Encouraging creativity goes a long way towards that. All that needs to be done is to give non-meta decks some space.

    So, it's time for non-meta play mode in Hearthstone! It can be a variant of play mode with standard and wild formats. The only difference would be a weekly updated list of (variants of) decks that can't be played. It can't take a lot of work, as the required data already exists. Just look at hsreplay. For the players, it could amount to a single checkbox 'Experimental mode' in Play mode and a pop-up saying the currently selected deck can't be played in experimental mode. That's it! A simple change that would add a lot of depth to the daily Hearthstone experience.

    Don't want a separate variant? Then implement this during matchmaking. Match non-meta decks with each other more often.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 4

    posted a message on Brawl of Champions Round Two Is This Week's Tavern Brawl

    No balance, yet another opportunity for a fun event turned into a frustrating sh*tshow. Who comes up with this stuff?

    That druid deck is an absolute disaster. Tried it twice, full mulligan twice, unable to play a card the first two-three turns. Then again, it's hard to come up with three viable druid decks after those ridiculous ramp nerfs.

    Mage and Warlock OP. Turn 3 discard entire hand, gg. At least it was a quick game. Most of them were actually. Completely one sided that is.

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on Kelesethspionage - Top 60 legend

    Sorry but I don't see the value over the earlier Espionage decks.

    By adding Keleseth there are even more cards that need to be drawn at the right time. Removal such as Eviscerate and Sap has been sacrificed. I even miss Fan of Knives. Edwin has also disappeared, which is a great tempo card if not an alt win.

     

    Posted in: Kelesethspionage - Top 60 legend
  • 7

    posted a message on The Headless Horseman Rides is This Week's Brawl!

    Worst brawl ever. There's a difference between hard and impossible. This is infuriating and not worth the effort at all. I'd be surprised if more than 5% of all players got their pack within 10 tries.

    And the joy of drawing those Stormwind Champions over and over again. Brilliant touch!

    Aren't games supposed to be enjoyable? An infuriating grind for 1 lousy pack is not fun. Is that news to you Blizz?

     

     

    Posted in: News
  • -2

    posted a message on Reminder: Year of the Raven Celebration is Now Active - Free Packs With Completed Dailies!

    "don't worry if you can't complete a daily each day" --> Seems like bad advice. If you don't login, you don't a quest for that day. Or has that changed?

    Also, does anyone know if existing quests will lose their pack on April 9th? (So complete or just get the quests before the 9th?)

    Posted in: News
  • 30

    posted a message on Patches the Pirate Loses Charge - Four Card Nerfs Coming in February

    WAY. TOO. LATE.

    Posted in: News
  • 4

    posted a message on Blizzard Battle.net Chat Application Now Available on Android and iOS

    Offline mode please!

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on Hearthstone is more reasonably affordable than I thought.
    Quote from Maehlice >>

    For me, a comparison of HS to other CGs is moot, because I don't enjoy the others like I do Hearthstone.  I would never argue that HS is cheap, but compared to what other video games [of varying genre and type] offer, Hearthstone is worth considering.

    And, as was mentioned by a couple others, AAA titles are finite, so I have to consider not only their initial cost but also the quantity of them I would need to fill the same timeslot as HS.  That brings the overall price of HS more in line with what I already have been spending on other games and entertainment.

    I agree that HS can be fun. Wouldn't be here if it wasn't. If I may summarize, what you're basically saying is that you love HS so much you don't mind paying 210$ a year for it. As an opinion, that's fine.
    You also argue that HS has an extremely high replay value. I agree, but would argue that this is subjective and other games (can) offer a high replay value as well. Personally, I've got a few games I keep going back to, no matter how old they are. Most of them are older than HS.
    What bothers me though, is that these opinions seem to be defending exuberantly high prices. And yes, they are high prices. An objective comparison of HS to other games quickly shows that Blizzard asks a lot of money for very little and uncertain content that cannot be sold or traded.
    As a consumer, it is simply against your own interests to defend high prices. Some of you seem to be forgetting that we would all win if HS prices were to drop.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Hearthstone is more reasonably affordable than I thought.
    Quote from WizardSteve >>

    Whether Hearthstone is expensive or not is very subjective as it very much depends on the financial situation of individual and how important Hearthstone is to them compared to the other ways they spend their time. However, one thing I can say is that the cost of maintaining a complete or near complete collection has plummeted since the no-duplicate-legendaries change.

    On the contrary, comparing HS to other games is objective. Yes, every consumer will decide what and how much to buy. And yes, those choices will be influenced by personal preferences and budgets. That pretty much applies everywhere, and it doesn't affect the conclusion that HS is ridiculously overpriced compared to other games.
    Non-dupe legendaries are indeed a step in the right direction. The recent festivals also cut us some slack. It has been said steps like these are a consequence of increased competition from other games. Let's hope that competition continues to increase and HS's prices will become reasonable. For now, there's a long way to go.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.