Hearthpwn

nice job

yeah priest is prob the weakest class, btw last week Norwis got rank 1 legend in 2 servers with Bless Priest

You have a point, I will test more matches with it.

This deck is definitely good, I would say at least tier 2. Nice job :)

Usual control warrior has 60%wr against mech paladin, 45% wr against galakrond zoolock and 35% against token druid. Now think in a highlander control warrior: half of the removals and because of that also half of the consistancy on getting them. Man, I really dont think this deck is good against aggro and maybe you got good results because maybe its good against rogues, galakrond control warrior and face hunter.

Cool deck. Some suggestions: Big O Whelp is the worst card of the deck, it sucks your sidequest and its probably the last card you want to play against an aggro deck. I know its for breath of dreams, so I would change two copies for another dragon (a big one to combo with the sidequest).

Embiggen doesnt make sense in a big druid, you want the mana asap to build a wall but at the same time you are growing the mana values. Its also important to say that Embiggen buffs your minions but at the same time is on a card slot, so if you have in your hand its like one card less. 

Splintergraff is very greedy but I can see its potential as a good win condition against control decks, so I cant say much (I just faced rogues on ladder playing this deck, so I cant give a solid opinion).

Floop ruined my sidequest sometimes, so I think its not so good. I can see him just as another card that helps against control, but you already run ysera and splintergraff, so I dont think its cool to ruin your sidequest (one of the mpvs of the deck) to run floop.

I think you can add at least one copy of the 3/12 taunt beast to extra consistency on predatory instincts and because of that maybe a oondasta. I hated innervate and I think wild growth is better since the ramp is so precious in this druid and is not a dead card at turn 10 since it gives you other card.

Solid card, it has potential to be discovered. I can see it maybe in some highlander decks, since this archetype usually isn't as sinergical as other archetypes, you can fit some cards like this. I will test this on my highlander dragon paladin (since the deck sucks, it's good to always test new things).

Very cool. I used to love Atiesh and the way it could make even slow decks have some tempo. However, this version looks viable for all kinds of shaman decks (except aggro maybe)

I don't know if the bodys of the legendary minions pool is at least avarage, but I really like this card. If you are in a non weapon meta, you can play this on curve and you can enjoy good tempo plays next turns or you can play later using spells in the same turn and if you summon a single 4/5 the card already paid its cost using only one durability.

lol no one cares but at the same time you really had to spend your time to comment this, i think you are really bothered (and IDK why)

Quote from SinAscendant >>

Hey dude. Protip, sidequests still count as quests, it doesn't have to be a quest deck to run him.

 LOL dude, I literally said in one of my comments. However, Kragg is bad EVEN in sidequests decks, because you need to buy one sidequest before you can play Kragg, maybe if u play about 4 sidequests (which looks like a nightmare) kragg may be viable, but still not amazing

Quote from Lyconik >>

Quote from laadeedaa >>

 

Quote from Lyconik >>

Quote from laadeedaa >>

Quote from Nickfuryusn >>

What's the point of this card? Who wants to run this? Why is this taking a legendary spot?

 Any Quest deck at all!?!?!

 

This card is good for aggro quest decks as 6/5 worth of stats where 2/3 of the stats protect the 4/2. This is great for Tempo decks as it takes back initiative by using the 4/2 to kill whatever minions on board leaving a 2/3. And with control, you get to remove a minion with the 4/2 and have some health savings with the 2/3 taunt. 

 

I swear people just post troll comments all the time, but if it isn't a troll comment then god help us.

 When you rate a card, you have to look at the meta and see what is already playable or not. Right now, the control deck that is using Quest is Control Priest. Does this deck want to run this card ? No.

Tempo one are Quest Druid and Quest Shaman. Quest Druid definitely don't want this, since it have far better options, and Quest Shaman is just doesn't good enough to be played seriously, even with this card in the list.

Now Aggro Quest is obviously Quest Hunter, and yes this is the perfect card for this archetype, 2 bodies in 1, rush, beast, 4 mana, and leave a taunt behind. 

This card will be only played in Quest Hunter and it will be one of the MVP, but don't talk about other quest deck. The same decks that are playing Questing Explorer will be playing this.

 I agree 100% with you. Just quest hunter and quest shaman can run this card (and both are avarage), since other quest decks (priest, druid) really can't run Kragg or have better cards than this (Quest druid cant play this on curve and also have stronger NON legendaries cards). Also, complementing you, neither sidequest decks will run this card, since you need to buy a sidequest before you can play kragg. Also, neither if quest decks were a thing Kragg would be amazing, because it's weaker than Scion of Ruin (and if you argue that scion of ruin needs invoke, Kragg has the same power level of Restless Mummy, which is a common card that you can run TWO copies)

Quote from Lyconik>>

@Lyconik

I agree 100% with you. Just quest hunter and quest shaman can run this card (and both are avarage), since other quest decks (priest, druid) really can't run Kragg or have better cards than this (Quest druid cant play this on curve and also have stronger NON legendaries cards). Also, complementing you, neither sidequest decks will run this card, since you need to buy a sidequest before you can play kragg.

@Lyconik

I agree 100% with you. Just quest hunter and quest shaman can run this card (and both are avarage), since other quest decks (priest, druid) really can't run Kragg or have better cards than this (Quest druid cant play this on curve and also have stronger NON legendaries cards). Also, complementing you, neither sidequest decks will run this card, since you need to buy a sidequest before you can play kragg.

So, Kragg is a quest shaman and quest hunter card (I forgot about hunter, but quest hunter is as avarage as the card). Sidequests deck only run Kragg if you use about 4 sidequests on your deck. 

Avarage/bad card. There is only ONE  quest deck that can run this (quest priest doesnt want to ress this, quest paladin is so inconsistent on completing the quest that cant run other random card to be even more inconsistent, quest druid cards have stronger power level than this and if you want to complete the quest fast you can't play this card on curve. Other quest decks are shit, so the only deck that can run this with good results is Quest Shaman).

If sidequests activate this card,  it's also a avarage since you need to buy the sidequest first and play this card after. If you think better, this card is weaker than Scion of Ruin (same cost) and has the same power of the 3/2 rush with reborn of warrior (same cost and dont need any condition). However, both cards can be used with 2 copies while Kragg is a legendary (1 copy per deck). 

So, IMO it's a card for quest shaman, since other quests decks either are horrible or really don't have a slot for it (quest hunter is the most next deck to have a slot for it, but it's an avarage deck)

lol, I didn't see that eye of the storm doesnt have twin spell. It's a balanced card, maybe a 3.5/5.