Well then we see things differently. I doubt aggro DH wants to play this over an actual threat. Like Viper said , if you play this vs Control , its very likely the other 4-7 cards in the opponents hand can handle the situation, especially since you just spend 4 mana for a 4/3... Also this can be pretty clunky to play in aggro with other outcast cards, but we will see , maybe it sees play .
I would have to agree Star Student Stelina is very far from being a '1'. Gaining information from 3 cards that they're holding is huge, not to mention you get to reduce their hand size. This is what made Madame Lazul so good, it was the huge information gain you got from her ability. For Aggro, Star Student Stelina is even better because you can remove their best counter from hand. She is like a 3 or 4 dude.
It depends if you see a World where Control DeamonHunter is a viable (at least tier 2 ) deck.
If not it doesnt matter if the card by itself is better than Madame Lazul. If DH is still a tempo/aggro class you dont play a gameplan interrupting card with questionable effect. You either play lots of stats, carddraw or removal. No way an aggrodeck can spend 4 mana do nothing immediate to the board/face.
Professor Slate 1 star? He isn't limited to only a spell damage hunter. Professor Slate + 1 Rapid Fire is literally a 5 mana 3/4 destroy 2 minions of your choice. Just pop him and 2 rapid fires in any hunter deck...
Thats the mistake most people make when evaluating cards outside of classes with absurd carddraw. Just like Pyro+Libram of Justice isnt op and is actually hard to pull of since you always seem to miss a part of that combo, the same goes for Hunter. Hunter isnt a class that can hold on for combo peaces.(Classes with healing can do that, and even there ...) Every card basically does something broken or proactive.
Generally speaking you never wanna play 2 bad cards to make 1 good combo, unless you have godlike carddraw or its a gamewining one.
My dude, it's not even a 4 out of 4, it's a 5 out of 4. A 1 mana 1/4 weapon in Demon Hunter? With its hero power? And not only that, it has a completely broken effect as well?
It's getting nerfed within the first week for sure.
This card can also be not good in every situation. When you draw the 2 mana weapon on turn 2, or when you wanna play the Overseer Satyr , now you have to attack face for 1 or he attacks a minion aswell? not always great.
As main Pally with the most wins i can almost fully agree with you this time. The only card i woulda rated differently is Lord Barov . This is a pure Warrior card imo.
Hes basically only playble in idk a super aggro deck? And even there he is kinda weird since he weakens your board so much and then the opponent only has to kill a 3/2... Its not like you can combo him With Pyromancer or some Lackeys (hes great with the rush or 2 dmg Lackey), only Consecration, or your own minions. And aggro Paladin didnt really needed an Equallity effect . He seems very conditional for me and looks really good in Warrior , but Paladin just has better options imo.
Even in Libram Paladin i never felt i needed more Equallitys, it was mostly the activation for it , like Consecration , Pyro etc. Since those are cards that you sometimes have to use to stay alive earlyier.
Thats why i mentioned Control... Priest can afford to play understated cards since the class is flooded with comeback mechanisms (aoe) and healing.
Well then we see things differently. I doubt aggro DH wants to play this over an actual threat. Like Viper said , if you play this vs Control , its very likely the other 4-7 cards in the opponents hand can handle the situation, especially since you just spend 4 mana for a 4/3... Also this can be pretty clunky to play in aggro with other outcast cards, but we will see , maybe it sees play .
It depends if you see a World where Control DeamonHunter is a viable (at least tier 2 ) deck.
If not it doesnt matter if the card by itself is better than Madame Lazul. If DH is still a tempo/aggro class you dont play a gameplan interrupting card with questionable effect. You either play lots of stats, carddraw or removal. No way an aggrodeck can spend 4 mana do nothing immediate to the board/face.
Thats the mistake most people make when evaluating cards outside of classes with absurd carddraw. Just like Pyro+Libram of Justice isnt op and is actually hard to pull of since you always seem to miss a part of that combo, the same goes for Hunter. Hunter isnt a class that can hold on for combo peaces.(Classes with healing can do that, and even there ...) Every card basically does something broken or proactive.
Generally speaking you never wanna play 2 bad cards to make 1 good combo, unless you have godlike carddraw or its a gamewining one.
This card can also be not good in every situation. When you draw the 2 mana weapon on turn 2, or when you wanna play the Overseer Satyr , now you have to attack face for 1 or he attacks a minion aswell? not always great.
As main Pally with the most wins i can almost fully agree with you this time. The only card i woulda rated differently is Lord Barov . This is a pure Warrior card imo.
Hes basically only playble in idk a super aggro deck? And even there he is kinda weird since he weakens your board so much and then the opponent only has to kill a 3/2... Its not like you can combo him With Pyromancer or some Lackeys (hes great with the rush or 2 dmg Lackey), only Consecration, or your own minions. And aggro Paladin didnt really needed an Equallity effect . He seems very conditional for me and looks really good in Warrior , but Paladin just has better options imo.
Even in Libram Paladin i never felt i needed more Equallitys, it was mostly the activation for it , like Consecration , Pyro etc. Since those are cards that you sometimes have to use to stay alive earlyier.