Yup. New Hunter legendary weapon will be a 10 mana 3/3 with summon a 2/2 beast on every third attack.
Hunter Legendaries are always OP.
Name 1 good hunter legendary in the game that’s actually worth playing in a hunter deck.
Swamp King Dred is decent believe it or not, especialy before Bonemare was introduced. 7 mana for a very huge guy is acceptable, it's not 8 or 9 drop. If you're not playing face variant, but rather DK hunter, he is pretty good adition. I'm running it on rank 5+
the spellstone is actualy crazy in ideal scenarios, especialy vs rogue. Rogue can't deal with 3 separate bodies with 3 hp efficiently, especialy if you baked that up with traps.
My concern with spellstones is that to upgrade you should keep them in starting hand, which kinda hurts. but in ideal scenario (cloacked huntress, 2 secrets, spellstone and professional topdecks you can actualy just faceroll nearly ANY opponent.
Without Duskbreaker a lot of classes just screwed against 4 and even 3 wolves + traps on battlefield
TLDR - spellstones might fail completely. But the hunter one seems best honestly (i'm not hyping my class, i actualy play rogue, despite nickname)))
I've had success with Jurassic Park Hunter. Swamp King Dred and King Krush aren't bad if you build your deck right. Triggering a bunch of Devilsaur Eggs usually makes your opponent run out of removal for your really big dinos.
I've had success with Jurassic Park Hunter. Swamp King Dred and King Krush aren't bad if you build your deck right. Triggering a bunch of Devilsaur Eggs usually makes your opponent run out of removal for your really big dinos.
How is Dred for you? I keep on thinking about him in Wild, but then going "Nah, he's just a big thing that dies to poison, and doesn't work with N'zoth.". Does Dred do a lot of work for you, other than just being fat? I mean, I know poisonous stuff doesn't get played, and i'm overwary there, but does it kill much? Worse against Razakus, better against mage (requires hard removal before they combo, and the 4 attack is meh in that MU), compared to something like Cairne (who's in over highmane because of 2x4-att, paired with PoM wrecking the hyenas). Cairne does add a bit of bite to N'zoth, though, which can be needed if opp got transform removal.
I've seen my Dred get killed by poisonous maybe 2 times out of over 100 games. If you want to run N'zoth make dred one of your only beasts and use Abominable bowman. I've had games where dred is killed and resummoned 4 times. Its a good card but like I said, only if you build your deck correctly. You can't just throw him in a face deck and expect him to be great.
5 out of 10 Hunter cards have not been revealed including all of the common cards. Surely blizzard is saving the best for last!
Yup. New Hunter legendary weapon will be a 10 mana 3/3 with summon a 2/2 beast on every third attack.
Hunter Legendaries are always OP.
Hunter's commons are usually good. I hope they're good, I would really like a t1/t2 hunter that isn't the usual face/midrange.
third card today seems to belong hunter
the spellstone is actualy crazy in ideal scenarios, especialy vs rogue. Rogue can't deal with 3 separate bodies with 3 hp efficiently, especialy if you baked that up with traps.
My concern with spellstones is that to upgrade you should keep them in starting hand, which kinda hurts. but in ideal scenario (cloacked huntress, 2 secrets, spellstone and professional topdecks you can actualy just faceroll nearly ANY opponent.
Without Duskbreaker a lot of classes just screwed against 4 and even 3 wolves + traps on battlefield
TLDR - spellstones might fail completely. But the hunter one seems best honestly (i'm not hyping my class, i actualy play rogue, despite nickname)))
I've had success with Jurassic Park Hunter. Swamp King Dred and King Krush aren't bad if you build your deck right. Triggering a bunch of Devilsaur Eggs usually makes your opponent run out of removal for your really big dinos.
In my opinion Cairne doesn't belong in a hunter deck. You have better options.