Elemental buff and c'thun paladin was Ele-thun-t which is far away enough from elephant that if you did not make it yourself you would not see what I was going for. But after that deck any deck with elementals got called elephant and the class. So my infinite servant of kalimos value rogue in wild is elephant rogue, my tempo elemental priest is elephant priest and so on.
I have a Lilian voss rogue on an alt account with burgle effects and violet teachers and I call it "a bad influence on kids" in "honor" of Betsy Devoss, who is in charge of education in the U.S.
My whirlwind effect based warrior is called "it seems to say hello" in a reference nobody will get because even if they know of the band they might be giants and they know all of the thirty second or less songs they wrote, the likelihood they would connect whirlwind effects with the song that goes: "I hear the wind blow, I hear the wind blow, it seems to say hello, hello, I am the one who loves you so" is small.
i have a bunch of decks with corpse taker so here are some names of them
paladin: look what the corpse dragged in
warrior: dead metal
priest: hung at the altar
My daring reporter decks in order of paladin, druid, and rogue are:
"you get a card" "and you get a card" "everybody gets a card"
Also yes I have a dating reporter paladin, it is a control handbuff but I don't play it anymore since it sucked when I made it and it would suck more now.
Then I have about a hundred decks that are "what's the deal with x" decks the x being whatever card I am playing with building around. I only do that when I don't have a really dumb name for the deck, or when I named a deck and got baffled by the name the next day so I have to change it to be obvious.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Just fill your deck with one drops, that is creative deck design, right?
Most of my names are functional at best, if I'm making it for a quest or something similar. My one exception at the moment is a Dead Man's Hand warrior, who I have affectionately named 'Infinity War-rior.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
So, when a warrior uses Dead Man's Hand, what does that actually mean in terms of flavor? Is he the dead man? Does he cut off his own hand? Is that why he has Tentacles for Arms? Does he think that tentacles are actually as good as arms?
These reasons and more are why I think warriors are more mysterious than people give them credit for.
Mine fall somewhere between functional and Creative. Depends on when I make them and how original they are. Net decks or close to net decks tend to get less creative names. More creative in the morning, so generally those decks get funny names. Many Midrange decks are MR, or if I build 2 in the class, it's MR and MRS, like MR. Shaman and Mrs. Shaman. Right now they seem to be mostly functional... the most creative is my mage deck N'flj = N'zoth with Frost lich Jaina.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I always let it like it is default .. "Custom *class*"
Elemental buff and c'thun paladin was Ele-thun-t which is far away enough from elephant that if you did not make it yourself you would not see what I was going for. But after that deck any deck with elementals got called elephant and the class. So my infinite servant of kalimos value rogue in wild is elephant rogue, my tempo elemental priest is elephant priest and so on.
I have a Lilian voss rogue on an alt account with burgle effects and violet teachers and I call it "a bad influence on kids" in "honor" of Betsy Devoss, who is in charge of education in the U.S.
My whirlwind effect based warrior is called "it seems to say hello" in a reference nobody will get because even if they know of the band they might be giants and they know all of the thirty second or less songs they wrote, the likelihood they would connect whirlwind effects with the song that goes: "I hear the wind blow, I hear the wind blow, it seems to say hello, hello, I am the one who loves you so" is small.
i have a bunch of decks with corpse taker so here are some names of them
paladin: look what the corpse dragged in
warrior: dead metal
priest: hung at the altar
My daring reporter decks in order of paladin, druid, and rogue are:
"you get a card" "and you get a card" "everybody gets a card"
Also yes I have a dating reporter paladin, it is a control handbuff but I don't play it anymore since it sucked when I made it and it would suck more now.
Then I have about a hundred decks that are "what's the deal with x" decks the x being whatever card I am playing with building around. I only do that when I don't have a really dumb name for the deck, or when I named a deck and got baffled by the name the next day so I have to change it to be obvious.
Just fill your deck with one drops, that is creative deck design, right?
Most of my names are functional at best, if I'm making it for a quest or something similar. My one exception at the moment is a Dead Man's Hand warrior, who I have affectionately named 'Infinity War-rior.
So, when a warrior uses Dead Man's Hand, what does that actually mean in terms of flavor? Is he the dead man? Does he cut off his own hand? Is that why he has Tentacles for Arms? Does he think that tentacles are actually as good as arms?
These reasons and more are why I think warriors are more mysterious than people give them credit for.
Mine fall somewhere between functional and Creative. Depends on when I make them and how original they are. Net decks or close to net decks tend to get less creative names. More creative in the morning, so generally those decks get funny names. Many Midrange decks are MR, or if I build 2 in the class, it's MR and MRS, like MR. Shaman and Mrs. Shaman. Right now they seem to be mostly functional... the most creative is my mage deck N'flj = N'zoth with Frost lich Jaina.