In the Classic set we saw mostly stuff present in Warcraft 3. From the Night Elf arsenal, of the Ancients (the Structures) all were present but the Tree of Life (which we saw appear in GvG) and the Ancient of Wind. While we wait for the official version, here's my take on it.
I'm not sure if this would be OP. 5/8 Charge for 7, or 8/5 Windfury for 7. I know I would certainly play at least 1 in a Combo/Mid Druid. Maybe 5/7 and a 7/5 would have been more balanced? Don't know...
In terms of stat/mana calculation both Charge and Windfury tend to double the "worth" of the attack stat.
So this is an 8/5 with windfury -> 21 total value, which is worth 10 mana. Or it's a 5/8 with charge which is worth 18, for 8.5 mana value. Either way with these stats this card is very OP. Because it's a class card maybe 8 mana would be okay? The windfury part is really crazy.
In the Classic set we saw mostly stuff present in Warcraft 3. From the Night Elf arsenal, of the Ancients (the Structures) all were present but the Tree of Life (which we saw appear in GvG) and the Ancient of Wind. While we wait for the official version, here's my take on it.
I'm not sure if this would be OP. 5/8 Charge for 7, or 8/5 Windfury for 7. I know I would certainly play at least 1 in a Combo/Mid Druid. Maybe 5/7 and a 7/5 would have been more balanced? Don't know...Edit: Made it a +2 instead of +3
In terms of stat/mana calculation both Charge and Windfury tend to double the "worth" of the attack stat.
So this is an 8/5 with windfury -> 21 total value, which is worth 10 mana. Or it's a 5/8 with charge which is worth 18, for 8.5 mana value. Either way with these stats this card is very OP. Because it's a class card maybe 8 mana would be okay? The windfury part is really crazy.
Have a great deck that's really, really cheap? Help the new players out
Yeah it's definitely OP as it is now. I would probably drop the +3 attack/health down to a +2 or probably even a +1. I like the idea though!