I think it's a great card but the quest thing means it won't really fit Warrior imo...I mean yeah, you could play Hack the System and then this to activate it but I'm not sure...
Quest Taunt Warrior in Wild is very improved by this card.
I like that they actually did the text correctly where you get the bonus no matter if your quest is complete or not. Questing Explorer and the new Licensed Adventurer are always bad draws late in the game when the quest is already complete. This retains its functionality.
When you rate a card, you have to look at the meta and see what is already playable or not. Right now, the control deck that is using Quest is Control Priest. Does this deck want to run this card ? No.
No, that logic is how you get idiotic rating vote spreads like this:
I think it's a great card but the quest thing means it won't really fit Warrior imo...I mean yeah, you could play Hack the System and then this to activate it but I'm not sure...
Quest Taunt Warrior in Wild is very improved by this card.
I like that they actually did the text correctly where you get the bonus no matter if your quest is complete or not. Questing Explorer and the new Licensed Adventurer are always bad draws late in the game when the quest is already complete. This retains its functionality.
No, that logic is how you get idiotic rating vote spreads like this:
https://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/card-discussion/235388-new-mage-legendary-card-reno-the-relicologist
You rate the card on its standalone power first and go from there about how it affects other decks.