as a midrange pala, if i go for certain against a control warrior, patron warrior or druid, should i remove the chows for like anther equality, harrison or shit, or they still hold some value?
Well against those classes u listed r Chows basicly useless, even worse then useless, since they will heal them. Best case scenario, they will eat a charge from Winaxe, thats it. If u want a 1 drop, Argent Squires would be probably better. But weapon destructions/silence cards might be better to tech in, yup.
lets be more specific, i will for sure cut 1 for a harrison or ooze (this is question number 1 XD) , but should i cut the other for a thing like silence or anther equality? let me just remind u that its for warrior AND druid.
but lately i feel warrior matches arent going that well probably cuz they started running different things like harrison and justicar bash and whatever new things they ran which makes my life harder. i feel warrrior matches are not in my advantuge.
im also not sure about the druid, ive always considered it a counter to midrange paladin. its very hard to remove the aspirant and with spells like innervate and swipe he just overrun u most of the time.
also u didnt considers patron. i know its a very hard matchup against paladin, but even so if i didnt had a choise and i had to play pala against it i would like to hear the changes i could make
my initiale thoughts about a second equality was after some but not much games against patron control and druid, which helped me abit since i got as i said, overrun.
im currently a legend player, so ive tasted the meta and u seems like an experienced played urself so i would like to here ur thoughts or anyone else about the matter.
and u are right, a second equality helps less against the warrior, but my problem is that i have a deck, i know im going to be against one of those decks (patron control and druid) and im trying to make changes to make it better against those since i dont have to consider other decks.
the thing about equality is that maybe i will have to face patron, and against druid it does help, so it can do some work. so the big thing here before i can close this thread is my friend, if u were in this spot, what would u put, now that u see the deck, considering all the 3 decks u can encounter (i didnt mentioned before but its a part of a tourney in my community and u must pick deck beforehand, i didnt heared about the prizes at start so i made a rush choise, and i picked druid and pala, now i am worried about a certain opponent which has druid and warrior. now the rules are that if u win with a deck, u cant choose it again, so u can take that into consideration as well.)
hello
as a midrange pala, if i go for certain against a control warrior, patron warrior or druid, should i remove the chows for like anther equality, harrison or shit, or they still hold some value?
What's wrong with Zombie Chow as an early game card ?
nothing, but i ask if its worth the slot, its not versus ladder decks, only for the warriors and druid
Well against those classes u listed r Chows basicly useless, even worse then useless, since they will heal them. Best case scenario, they will eat a charge from Winaxe, thats it. If u want a 1 drop, Argent Squires would be probably better. But weapon destructions/silence cards might be better to tech in, yup.
- Click Here To Join Us On Discord! -
Chows only REALLY heal in mid- and late game. If you play them early (as intended) they don't do harm.
moved to Paladin forum
ty for the answers till now
lets be more specific, i will for sure cut 1 for a harrison or ooze (this is question number 1 XD) , but should i cut the other for a thing like silence or anther equality? let me just remind u that its for warrior AND druid.
FTD90, tnx for long replay
but lately i feel warrior matches arent going that well probably cuz they started running different things like harrison and justicar bash and whatever new things they ran which makes my life harder. i feel warrrior matches are not in my advantuge.
im also not sure about the druid, ive always considered it a counter to midrange paladin. its very hard to remove the aspirant and with spells like innervate and swipe he just overrun u most of the time.
also u didnt considers patron. i know its a very hard matchup against paladin, but even so if i didnt had a choise and i had to play pala against it i would like to hear the changes i could make
my initiale thoughts about a second equality was after some but not much games against patron control and druid, which helped me abit since i got as i said, overrun.
im currently a legend player, so ive tasted the meta and u seems like an experienced played urself so i would like to here ur thoughts or anyone else about the matter.
well first of all i never said i swap silence man XD its in dont worry
secondly , i currently run strifecro deck:
http://www.hearthstonetopdecks.com/decks/strifecros-atlc-finale-midrange-paladin/
and u are right, a second equality helps less against the warrior, but my problem is that i have a deck, i know im going to be against one of those decks (patron control and druid) and im trying to make changes to make it better against those since i dont have to consider other decks.
the thing about equality is that maybe i will have to face patron, and against druid it does help, so it can do some work. so the big thing here before i can close this thread is my friend, if u were in this spot, what would u put, now that u see the deck, considering all the 3 decks u can encounter (i didnt mentioned before but its a part of a tourney in my community and u must pick deck beforehand, i didnt heared about the prizes at start so i made a rush choise, and i picked druid and pala, now i am worried about a certain opponent which has druid and warrior. now the rules are that if u win with a deck, u cant choose it again, so u can take that into consideration as well.)
sry for nuggin, but thats all the changes u would have made? what about the ooze/harrison thing? or new stuff, less zombies chows.
ty
ty again