Hearthpwn

Depends on what you're playing against. The version that has more late game has not had much success for me. This version has.

I don't prefer playing aggro decks in fact I really prefer control decks but at this point I don't care anymore. I'm extremely tired of losing just based on draw RNG and my opponents being the luckiest sons of bitches to ever play hearthstone and be graced by the RNG Gods.

Yes, that is baby raging. But at this point I really stopped caring. I don't mind losing, I mean shit happens but I don't like losing every game just because my hand is the top half of my curve while my low cost minions are just sitting in the deck.

I've found the aggro version to be better against most opponents. If you have a full board almost every round its hard for them to keep up with. Yes they 'can' deal with it, but usually they just can't keep up. Yes you'll lose against those who can find the ability to control the board. But with this deck most games end around turn 4-5 depending on their deck archetype and the luck of the draw. 

Best thing you can do is to make both, play both and just see how it works out for you. Choose then. 

No problem, I don't normally reply (severe anxiety) but when I feel like I have something to add I try to do so. 

I decided to test out 3 versions of Murlocadin because it was my day off and I had nothing better to do. Please keep in mind this was all at rank 15 so I wouldn’t care if I lost stars. I imagine a different outcome for each rank tier.

The versions are:

• This version on this page. Dubbed “Murloc hit face”
• A more midrange/control version that has Stampeding Kodo, Sunkeeper, Curator, Rag Lightlord, and Tirion. Dubbed “MC”
• And another that is much more aggro, but includes Kodo, 1 Spikeridged Steed, Sunkeeper, and Tirion. Christened “the Bullshit”

I don’t have exact match details (I played around 15 for each deck) but I have win rates. Also I only played around 15 games, which isn’t a great sample size.

Murloc hit Face – 60% won 9/15 games. Losses were mainly non-aggro favorable hands, or the opponent stalling and forcing me to lose tempo

MC – 46.7 % won 7/15 games. I’m ‘familiar’ with all 3 decks, but I had the hardest time with this one. I think it was mainly due to consistently drawing the top end of my curve. However, I accept that I could have made a lot of mistakes and over committed quite a bit.

The Bullshit – 80% won 12/15 games. Now I don’t know if it was just luck on my part, but I had a lot of fun with this deck. I will say I was lucky and in almost every game drew the 1 Spikeridged Steed in the deck. Overall I’d say this is my personal favorite.

So, back to my original comment lol – the best thing to do is to just try out each one and see which one works better for you. ‘The Bullshit’ which I’ve also named it that in my deck lists worked out the best for me. I hope this helps somewhat, or gives you a basic idea.

I really think it just depends on your opponent’s class and deck archetype. ‘The Bullshit’ had an easier time dealing with different archetypes in my opinion. I could have, however, just been unlucky with the MC version.

This is the version I had the most luck with, Click here.  This is NOT discounting or disregarding the Posters aggro version, but it is the version I found to be a bit more reliable.

I would still recommend testing both and seeing which one works for you. The one you mentioned with Ragnaros, Lightlord did not work that great for me, but we all play differently and like different things.

Best of luck!