Hearthpwn

Quote from Vernula >>

Quote from Falbrogna >>

Quote from Vernula>>

Quote from Falbrogna>>

Quote from Vernula>>

 .... You really can't complain about printing cards that promote new decks and then bitch about Purify in the same post :/

 You already said this hogwash in the other thread and it's not gonna sound any better here. The problem with Purify was that it costed way too much for what it did, that's why the card is bad. Imagine if Brann costed 9 mana, it would be an horrible card.

Mana cost is what often makes something terrible or not, not the card text. Having a cool idea that promotes new decks and then make it unplayable is the same as not doing anything at all.

 Oh? You say that as though we aren't playing a game where the entire point of deckbuilding is trying to find out the most efficient way of doing things.

Purify costing less or affecting enemies would completely invalidate Silence as a card, because why pay 0 for an effect when you can pay 1 or 2 and dig while casting it?[/quote]

Because Tempo, Combo, Synergy effects and whatnot.

Brann Bronzebeard costing 9 is egregious and isn't the same thing at all, apples and oranges. We are talking about a card that, if we were to use your comparison, would be a Brann Bronzebeard costing 5. Still a good card, but could be better at a lower mana cost.

Which by the way, is an applicable argument to every card in the damn game. Imagine Dr. Boom at 6 mana. soooooooooo much better.

It's actually a very fitting example. Sometimes giving something a +1mana cost makes the difference between good and unplayable, as was the case with Purify. It's not a coincidence that many nerfs revolve around upping mana cost rather than changing the stats.

It honestly feels like I'm talking with someone very new at this game. No offence.

 And it feels like I'm talking to someone with more opinion than sense. Brann Bronzebeard would be a perfectly playable card at 5. Dr. Boom would still be good at 8, and Mysterious Challenger would be good at 7.

 

Purify is a good card at 2 mana for what it's trying to do. It's just that what it's trying to do doesn't work.

Oye idiota... esto es Freeze mage... no Tempo Mage...
Hey Idiot.... This is Freeze Mage....... Not Tempo Mage...
ROOOOOOOOOOOFL DOwnvote this please LUL

Quote from HustlerLuke >>

against priest - he plays zombie, circle, double flashheal (1xfh 2xzombie).

against warriror - he plays brawl, (any removal on taunt) equip deatsh bite, hit you. next turn grom.

this both classes don't wait until you play jara and then concede, ok? they playin some stuff and there is no quite turn to play on clear board with no cards in their hands. if you plays taunt's before playin jara they can easily clear it.

i was playin jarraxus in dreadstead lock (most heavy control deck) and finally i cut it, replace for elise and put sideshow spealeater in it. now i have about 95% winrate against priest and 100% against warriors. before it i loose many games in scenario like i wrote before. and i told you, in this version of renolock it's contains much meat to deal 2-14  dmg before combo for 16-28 dmg

10 games? really? good statistical base. thanks god you lost 3 times, another way we get one more *100% winrate deck*.

zombie chow is actually bad. demonwrath way better. zoolock only one class, who run eggs, don't need to orient on it. you place worst scenario here - turn 1 jugler, turn 2 egg. you can also silence turn2 and turn 3 demonwrath, not a big deal.

most of times - you put zombie, zoo plays creeper, egg. turn2-3 PO\abusive and kills zombie. it's actually do nothing in this matchup.

How the %&/"! Dirty Rat is a dead card against pirates ? LOL... they don't run big minions... you can literally play this as 2 drop... and even when they are all in without no hand... you play Rat as 2/6 taunt... thats NUTS against pirate warrior..

Just asking... at what rank are you playing?.... i am already rank 3... and i dont see any rogue... that's why becauuse jade rogue suckks.... there's no point to build a deck that is worst version of another one...... Jade Druid is SOOOO much better in every aspect... even Jade Shaman is more agressive than Jade rogue.... 

Nice jade rogue deck we havee eh! RROOOOOOFL

Quote from NaweG >>

OK, how do you deal when they bring out Ancient of War on turn 4 or 5 with an Innervate? I've run into that about 4 times now, and 10 health is still a pretty big hill. Granted this is at levels 14 and 13 so perhaps the meta is slower "down here"?

 

yeah, this deck is super favoured against jade druid....

guys, you have to be very bad.... this deck destroys Jade Druid... i am rank 7 curre, so maybe you need to learn some basic mechanics :)

Harrison is really good right now, if you destroy Spirit claws with 3 charges you automatically win lol because you will have so much resources to respond every threat the scumbag shaman puts on the field. You should craft it.

Black knight can be really good, you can try it and replace bloodhoof for it :) let me know how BK is doing in the meta please :P

DONE

welp... first of all shamans are not 6O% of the meta.... you can try bgh if you want... you don't have to copy my exact list. lul

yeah u can put bgh for bloodhoof if u are facing too many druids, i really don't like yogg in this deck because if you are facing other control deck and you go to fatigue, yogg probably will draw you cards and make you lose, or just kill himself and do nothing.... and is not needed against mid shaman and aggro, you already have the tools to deal with them. Yogg is fine in druid because they don't have board clears but warrior as a lot so fuck yoog haha