• 2

    posted a message on What’s your lvl on new progress system?
    Quote from Skyi101 >>

    153, no pass. Wasnt for or against BP, just don't like the challenge bs. Feel like for the amount I'm playing I'm getting less returns.

    Usually I hit 9-10k by now when I play regularly, not miss quests, max rerolls, however, I'm only at 7.5k.

    I play mostly standard and have high wr, legend each month. So I think the daily wins + quests was ultimately netting myself more gold then I get now...

     that can't be true at all. Until Level 50 you've got 5650 and for 103 Levels on top you've got 5150, so you earned 10800 Gold. If you've spent any Gold in between it's not the fault of the System.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on What’s your lvl on new progress system?

    after the weekly quests i will be 124 without the pass. i really don't play a lot, so thats totally fine with me

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Who is preordering and if, which bundle?

    when the expansion hits i'll probably have 15k Gold, so i get none this time

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on My Opinion about The New Heroskins

    I really don't understand why people always complain about the costs of cosmetics. If you don't like the skins, don't buy it. It's easy as that. When you look at the cost of CoD Warzone, there is one Operator Skin, mostly 2 Weapon Blueprints and 3-4 other cosmetics for 20+$. Same goes for Fortnite and enough other games. Theses games are free and need the shop incomes to provide further support for the game. I play Warzone regularly and never bought something from the shop, because i thinks it's way to expensive. But never ever would i complain about it. It's only cosmetics....

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Any other control/combo player feeling completely demotivated to start a game against warlock nowadays?
    Quote from Shadowrisen >>
    Quote from hillandder >>

    Anyone saying Tickatus is not insanely OP and broken as hell just remember, this card is a hundred times slower than him and still see play in some lists and looks hot garbage in comparison:

    Rin, the First Disciple

    This is a very well design when you think about, there is no problem to be able to destroy opponent deck if you earn that, Tickatus feels much more like a cheat engine than a real card in this game.

     And there were constant bitchfests about Rin from control players at the time.  I'd necro a few of them if the ridiculously opportunistic warning system wouldn't come calling again.

    Now the story is that Rin is well-designed.  That's actually comical, especially given that Rin would frequently get there against true control decks by turn 12 or 13, in which case it would destroy considerably more than ten cards.  I still have screen shots of the chat abuse that would follow.

    Don't get me wrong, Rin wasn't anywhere near over-powered, it simply served a purpose in the meta.  Sort of like Tickatus.

     

    You can't compare Rin and Tickatus. Against Rin you had enough Counterplay, against Tickatus you have nothing. I don't think we have a problem right now, because nobody plays Control. Aggro is way to good. Just wait until Rotation, there might be a meta change and if that happens, Tickatus alone will kill Control. Same happened back in the days, when Jade Druid was a thing. At least we had Skulking Geist....

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Any other control/combo player feeling completely demotivated to start a game against warlock nowadays?
    Quote from Shadowrisen >>

    Mecha'thun had a played win rate of >90% at one point, and if you think that's an asinine analogy, it's only . . . like 30% asinine and 70% instructive concerning using the played win rate statistic of a win condition card.

    As for the drawn . . . I don't see where you see this stat.  I'm seeing in the ball park of 80% played but not 65% drawn.

    Regardless, that's not answering my question at all.  Jumping to the drawn and played win rates eliminates a large amount of games with no justification for doing so.  There's no question Tickatus lock will have the best win rate against slow decks.  That was obvious from the start.  There has nearly always been a cost to playing slow control decks in the form of at least one deck that has a marked advantage over them.

    My point is, Tickatus Lock doesn't have that huge of an advantage against its best matchup.  I wrote the post about continuing to maintain a convincing winrate with Priest and Warrior because that's the entire issue.  If acceptable winrates are acheivable with those decks, what the fuck are we talking about here?

    Also, my ego is fairly large, but it's never been large enough to affect numbers.  Sorry you don't like me, Hog, but that is irrelevant to the topic at hand.  As always.  As usual.

     Galakrond Warlock is dominating Priest with his worst matchup ResPriest at 69% winrate. His matchup against ETC Warrior is even, but that's only because Warrior has no real "control" Build, it's a combo deck. Control Warlock is also highly favoured against Priest and slightly behind Warrior. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Any other control/combo player feeling completely demotivated to start a game against warlock nowadays?
    Quote from Shadowrisen >>

    Continuing to maintain a convincing win rate against all versions of Tickatus lock with ETC warrior and Big Priest.

    Continuing to wonder what the issue with this deck is, in terms that can actually be evaluated with some level of objectivity.

    Silence remains deafening.

     Tickatus has a drawn WR of 65% and a played WR of 80%. Don't you think that's a little bit to much?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on "No pathetic cards" achievement
    Quote from RAGEdarky >>
    Quote from farqtheorc >>

    Has to be ranked play my friend. Not casual.

    It's difficult, but not as hard as YoggChamp or Greybough.

    I didn't know it has to be Ranked, because it seems that most achivements are doable in Casual/Duels as well or am I wrong?

     definitely not in Casual, learned it the hard way....

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Meta change?

    sounds like my experience. we're on a downswing mate

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on Current status with the rewards track

    i play an average of 1 hour a day and i'm at 62. ~6k gold, which is way more than i normally would have at that point. Most expansions i was at 7-8k Gold when it hits, now i should have ~11,5k Gold (without any promos in between) when the expansion arrives early April.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on People who don't play wild, do you disenchant cards that rotate out?

    i always disentchant all the useless cards for wild, even if i play now and then

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on The Road to Level 50 - What's Your Choice?

    I took Warrior, because i have no other Skin for that class. Tbh i don't like this new arts very much, they could have been way better than that

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Decreased drop-rate for legendaries?
    Quote from Thaulopi >>

    So, I suck? Ok.

    I am very happy for you and the other players.

    God bless

    Thau

     That has nothing to do with "sucking", it's just luck, nothing else. Keep cool

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New bad hero’s must be created
    Quote from rogerdodger >>

    To incentivize battle pass. It must have a tangible pay2win quality so activision must keep adding bad hero’s to BG.

    see y’shaarj obviously terrible. Only added to make sure you will pay $20 to get the extra hero choices.

     and it's their right to do so. They do the work, they want to earn money, simple as it is. That's how this whole industry works

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on Voicing my dissatisfaction
    Quote from parishbishop >>
    Quote from Shiny >>
    Quote from Elexxtron >>

    BTW

     

     What about the other three?

     Exactly!!  Yes its frustrating sometimes, but Stickyfingers levels the playing field. You could also try Warrior and Galakrond Warrior at that to beat Evolve shaman fairly consisitently. Armoring up to 30 gives enought time to clear the boards and draw Stickyfingers etc....

    However, nerfs and buffs are good for the game and I too would like to see a mixup every month to keep the meta fresh. I grow tired of seeing the same decks over and over again. 

     Why does everyone think, Warrior is good against Shaman? In the new Data Reaper Report, it's at best a 50/50 for Control and Bomb Warrior is behind.... 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.