• 2

    posted a message on This card idea just seemed too perfect... [The Librarian]

    I like it, could even be a 3/4 in todays meta... pretty fair card that can't snowball too much bc of the small amount of silencing minions/ spells available 

    Posted in: Fan Creations
  • 1

    posted a message on Hearthstone is rigged af
    Quote from angrychicken18 >>
    Quote from palamanian >>

    Yes, can confirm the entire game was created just to screw with you personally. The jig is up, the secret is out, you did it OP! /s

    In other news, RNG can be a bitch sometimes.

     why you being a dick? its true that hs is rigged, they've even admitted it themselves they rig the matchmaking so players get around a 50% win-rate. It's clear they queue you into deck counters, this issnt hard to do with the research. Look at Zeph and how it instantly finds the perfect card.

     

     

     

     

     They "rig" the matchmaking by giving you opponents which fit your MMR. it would be way too hard otherwise. Look at all the threads were people rage about Zeph not working as he should.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Is something wrong with rng?
    Quote from mulluk >>

    Still waiting for your evidence.

     You're the one who's claiming unproven stuff, so it's on you to bring up some evidence, not the other way around

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on The next patch soon and Gadgetzan Auctioneer in Wild ?!?!

    The app probably put a different version of auctioneer into the deck than the core set one, so the game thought it was a wild deck

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Getting off a combo

    Saying it's not an animation issue doesn't change the fact that it's an animation issue.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Reckoning bug?
    Quote from Amaranthus >>

    Then they screwed up the wording at the very least. In comparison, Injured Blademaster says "Deal 4 damage to himself." That clarifies that the minion itself is the one dealing the damage. I would have no problem with Reckoning triggering on the Blademaster.

    Also, flavourwise, Reckoning shouldn't even trigger on damage to my own characters at all. But that is a different story.

     every battlecry minion that does damage is always the source of the damage dealt. if the battlecry of reckless apprentice does more than 3 damage for example he also triggers the secret bc he was using your heropower instead of you

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on How can dis be?

    Only thing I don't get about zeph is why he offers windspeaker that often... In my book it's one of the weaker 4 drops in classic/basic (if the windfury gives you lethal it's a different story, but somehow blizzard made zeph think windspeaker is great when you have at least one minion without looking at the opponents health)

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on How can dis be?

    yes that's one of many options, but he still needs to choose which one he offers to you. there are probably more than 10 cards, that would be good for 1 mana when your opponent (in the eyes of zeph) doesn't have an opressive board state, but since he can't read your mind he had to pick 3 out of them by himself... these are his flaws you need to learn when you want to (successfully) put this card in your deck.

    I'm not saying the 3 options he offered were better than a smite, but again, from his perspective these options have the same value as a smite. you'd maybe even get different outcomes for the same boardstate in different games, just bc zeph weights them all the same. But that's not the cards fault. next time you play against a board like this you know better and after learning from a lot of games you'll have a better feeling for when to play zeph and when to keep him for later, were you can get the desired outcome more likely.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on How can dis be?

    people told you why he offered these options. your complain about holy smite is not really doing anything about it. zeph can only offer 3 choices, at this boardstate there are a lot of options. zeph by himself has a 3/2 body, so he can kill the 2/3 by simply attacking, so he offered you an option to deal with the other threat on board, which is a 1/1...

    like zeph you also have 3 options: accept your mistakes and learn from them, don't accept you did somethign wrong and complain or simply don't play zeph anymore.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on How can dis be?
    Quote from Stupidusername >>

    you can't believe that zephyr sucks right now becouse you play him right and never got a bad choice. Stuuuuuupid

     that's the whole point of the discussion, he doesn't suck if you know how to play him and it still works. if you think this is stupid I can only imagine you don't know how to play him but believe you do and wonder why you still get bad outcomes...

    if he got worse for you since new cards got introduced, you need to adapt to these new cards when playing him. you can't expet the card itself to do this job for you. a card like Burning Blade Acolyte for example will be a problem for zeph bc for him it's just a 1/1 with some deathrattle. you as the player know more about the card, so you need to tell him what to do

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on How can dis be?
    Quote from Gray_Fox >>

    Why it did not offer Shooting Star? Of course! Because Zephrys isn't that great.

     if they haven't changed it after the introduction of the coreset, zephrys still don't offer cards from expansions

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on No dust....im screwed?

    if you mean clockwork giant you'll find him at the same place you found him before the coreset was a thing... filter for wild cards and he'll show up.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Nerf ideas
    Quote from Chewmass >>
    Quote from ADXE >>
    Quote from sPacEtiMe19 >>

    Tickatus is fine. It really shows that people don’t truly understand the game thinking he is why warlock destroys control and not jaraxxus. It’s 100% tied to “it feels bad having your cards destroyed.” He is beyond dead in the aggro matchup, and that’s a big enough weakness. 

    Lunacy is completely fine now. It’s VERY slow to cast it into the hunter/Paladin matchup now. 

    Your proposed change to Oh My Yogg has many situations where it actually makes it better. Sometimes it results in a spell that helps you. This just gives the Paladin even more tempo. 

    All of your proposed changes leads me to believe that you mostly play “do nothing” decks, as every card you want changed is very strong into do nothing decks, such as priest or warrior. 

    I think it’s good that there are checks and balances to people who build decks that do nothing proactive. That should be punishable. If you want to build a deck that contains 90% reactive cards, expect to get punished by certain decks. Tickatus and DoL are very healthy for the game. 

     No.  Tickatus destroys any other type of control deck.  Jaraxxus does not.  Jaraxxus prolongs the game.   Tickatus gets rid of 10 cards.  

    There is no hard counter to Tickatus.  Play aggro is not a hard counter.  Think about all of the cards including just released Barrens cards that you will not be playing because of Tickatus.  

    That's right.  All of those big dragons.  Nope.  There are literally 3 decks you can play, none of them because of Jaraxxus.  All because of Tickatus.  

    Edit:  Tickatus should be 9 mana.  If at 9 mana nobody ever plays it then it should be in it's right place, as a finisher or discolock.  Nothing else.  I doubt the real intension was for it to be discard 10 cards at 6 mana.   And if so someone was off their rocker.  

     

     Good Grace, you people have mastered crying with arguements. Just because you can't play your "control" fun deck with 4 old gods and 15 dragons doesn't mean that Tickatus is to blame. It's just a card. Hearhstone may not have a graveyard but has a sh#tload of value generation out of nowhere. The only tweaks I ever had to do in my decks was to either play more discover cards or even cards that shuffle back in my deck. And if it happens that a couple of times he gets rid of both of my Dire Frenzy, so be it. It's just a game we're  moving on.

     the funny part is, that I had no problem against tickatus warlock before the rotation, even with a way too greedy deck, that contained all 4 old gods. It's so clear that jaraxxus is the control killer here, but people tend to argue based on their feelings instead of data

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 0

    posted a message on After Nerfs Happen, Did Standard Actually Become "Good" Again
    Quote from Toribasher >>
    Quote from Haedeius >>
    Quote from Toribasher >>

    Priest looks less like a cancerous class. 

    Demon Hunter doesn't look like unfair cancer.

    no more token cancer.

     Seriously dude? Just quoted you post partly, so hopefully you can understand why. You should be ashamed of yourself. 

     I give you A+ in sucking at communication skills.

    I have no idea what your point is.  Are you saying Priest is cancer right now?  Are you saying Token Druid is still an archetype.

    And get your post right this time so people can understand what your disagreement with my observations are.

     It's pretty obvious to everyone that he's referring to the use of the word "cancer"... I know it's used in hearthstone since beta, but calling decks after a deadly disease still shows a bad taste

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 1

    posted a message on SHAMAN IS BEYOND GARBAGE RIGHT NOW, TY BLIZZ

    I can understand your frustration, but the expansion is only half a day old... how about waiting until some kind of meta settles and the real decks are discovered? maybe shaman will have a deck with good match ups, maybe it's trash, maybe it's just tier 2 or 3 like most classes, but the first day meta is hardly saying much

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.