• 0

    posted a message on WILD is broken!!!! AGAIN
    .
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 5

    posted a message on Is this normal?
    Quote from fabjx >>

    Is it normal for a class to kill 2 5/7 enemy minions with a 2/2 and a 1/2 and 4 available mana and yet ending up with a board of 4 minions?

      is it normal for a class to have 2 5/7 minions on board while the opponent has only 4 mana?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Resizing Pouch=Mana Biscuit
    Quote from irhmgg1 >>
    Quote from grisu >>

     I don't think you will be ble to discover survival of the fittest with pouch, bc it costs 10 mana and you'll have only 9 left when pouch's effect starts (bc you need to pay the 1 mana for pouch itself)

     you play Nature Studies turn 9 and your Pouch is zero mana

     somehow I missed that part... the card itself is quite good and I guess it will see play bc it's flexible. as you mentioned makes druids early ramp more consistent, but it's not a game changer for me...

    the comparison also doesn't work for me... mana biscuit enables new decks - maybe even some OTKs - while pouch supports already existing archetypes

    Posted in: Druid
  • 0

    posted a message on Resizing Pouch=Mana Biscuit

     I don't think you will be ble to discover survival of the fittest with pouch, bc it costs 10 mana and you'll have only 9 left when pouch's effect starts (bc you need to pay the 1 mana for pouch itself)

    Posted in: Druid
  • 0

    posted a message on Use for Kangor's Apprentice?

    would like to see him getting moved to 5*, junkbot removed/ down to 4* and a new 6* mech which has an impact... mechs right now have an okay midgame if you're lucky, but that's all they can offer

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on Deathwarden

    I don't like most of the silence cards you can play in standard... they are too understated and not usefull in most matchups (I never had a problem beating pala or shaman with control and other classes don't come to mind if I think about potential targets for silences)... this card has at least decent enough stats for the mana if you need to play for tempo (compared to owl for example it has +4 health and fits the same purpose for me)

    Posted in: Deathwarden
  • 0

    posted a message on NEW CARD--Envoy Rustwix

    since 8/9 primes cost more than 6 mana and you have a bigger deck through this card I guess it's also a good fit in tickatus warlock; helps winning the fatigue and activating tickatus

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Card - Big-Time Racketeer
    Quote from StaleMeta >>
    Quote from TheHiddenNinja7 >>
    Quote from Voex >>

    Heelloooooo

    Necromancy is a dark and evil form of magic, and thou shall be SMITTEN!

    (Translation: Reported for "Thread Necromancy". Sorry bro)

     That’s illegal?

     it is in most forums, at least if it is done like this... if he had a question about the card and searched the forum before opening a new thread, it's fine and in my oppinion the right way, but his post seems to have no purpose at all

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Deathwarden

    If ETC warrior is still a thing after the miniset, I'll play this card in every controldeck outside of mage and shaman, just to have an answer for rattlegore

    Posted in: Deathwarden
  • 0

    posted a message on New Clever Use of Mechanics discovered last week
    Quote from SinAscendant >>
    Quote from grisu >>
    Quote from SinAscendant >>
    Quote from grisu >>

    that's how far hearthstone has gone... people who use their brain and figure out synergies are now called cheaters

     Seeing as you have to disconnect your internet to do it, that's not a synergy, that's an exploit.

    he never explained anything like that. even though I'm sure this was what he had in mind after reading the comments which were posted later than mine. 

     I mean he didn't explain it very well but generally isn't looking it up the first thing you do if you don't know what someone is talking about ?

     I thought I understood him, bc he made a clear point which didn't need any further research on my side (even though the point I and others saw in his post wasn't the one he intended to make). you're on hearthpwn since 2013, so I guess you know how often someone screams hack or cheat when they don't understand what happened in the game.

    but let's stop with this offtopic stuff. the thread has a purpose now, that someone explained what is going on. I didn't know about this exploid and think they should fix it, but as far as I understand how it works, that's nearly impossible without removing khadgar from battlegrounds or change how he works... the main problem I see is that this exploid can be usefull in other cases, like before a bigger Kragg or elemental turn

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on New Clever Use of Mechanics discovered last week
    Quote from SinAscendant >>
    Quote from grisu >>

    that's how far hearthstone has gone... people who use their brain and figure out synergies are now called cheaters

     Seeing as you have to disconnect your internet to do it, that's not a synergy, that's an exploit.

    he never explained anything like that. even though I'm sure this was what he had in mind after reading the comments which were posted later than mine. 

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 18

    posted a message on New Clever Use of Mechanics discovered last week

    that's how far hearthstone has gone... people who use their brain and figure out synergies are now called cheaters

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on ice Block in battleground (Reno Jackson) how?
    Quote from YourPersonalGuru >>

    FYI

    This is what a hack looks like ;) 

     looks normal, what exactly should be a hack in your screenshot?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Tickatus would have the perfect nerf, yet Blizzard...
    Quote from Zonta >>

    First it’s not a joke. I’m assuming you are a warlock Tickatus player so I understand why you are defending it. Not everybody faces aggressive zoolocks, rogues or DH. I think the game matches you differently. You say that Thijs can beat gala warlocks but he does not represent the casual or normal player. Not everybody is a pro player.

    My argument was for us players that play Control or combo decks. There is no deny that Tickatus as of now, is a problem for control and combo decks now and in future expansions. 

    BTW, I play standard. I don’t know about wild.

     your argument was about tickatus in high ranks. now that someone showed you an example of how he really performes in those high ranks you twist your argument and say it's about casual players... 

    as someone who played a lot of tickatus and roughly the same amount of other control decks in different classes this expansion I can tell you he's not a really good card. you can highroll with/ get highrolled by him, but that doesn't happen that often, and even than it's not a guaranteed win for the warlock... at the moment I play a way too greedy meme mage with all 4 old gods and I even won games where a warlock burned all 3 gods + 1 c'thun part. they don't have any other real threats (at least they aren't a threat for any decent control deck) and often have to go so deep into their own deck to find tickatus, activators + y'shaarj that they don't even win in fatigue most of the time

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.