Hearthpwn

Quote from Hooghout >>

Even vicious S is an opinion, not writings on the wall. Aggro/face decks still dominate and that is called organized imbalance you and I have to deal with.

VS has opinions, but the data is not an opinion... Its data. There are plenty of decks at or above 50% wr, aggro shaman at the top only has 53%wr. Renolock, pirate warrior, dragon warrior, reno mage, aggro shaman, midrange sham, midjade sham, piracle rogue, dragon preist, and jade druid are all part of the meta. Thats sooooo muh better than a month ago with 55%wr midrange shamam with nothing else near it.

Quote from Hooghout >>

Even vicious S is an opinion, not writings on the wall. Aggro/face decks still dominate and that is called organized imbalance you and I have to deal with.

Here i found it for you:

Me-Edit: I hope you weren't refering to Piracle rogue which is clearly miracle rogue which, while it can be quick, is not an aggro deck.

Sherman- I was obviously refering to Pirate Rogue, which is definetly an aggro deck, that is why I wrote "Pirate Rogue" bro.

Quote from Shockii412 >>

Quote from bobknobslobr >>

Quote from TheWamts >>

Quote from bobknobslobr >>

http://www.vicioussyndicate.com/vs-data-reaper-report-31/

@sherman

Why do you do this to yourself? Pirate rogue isnt even t4 let alone t3. Its not on the list period.

And there you go assuming im playing the decks you dislike because im calling you out on your weak and groundless, factfree pseudo arguement

 

 Miracle Rogue is technically a Pirate Rogue deck.

In the same way Freeze Mage is technically a Face Mage deck,

 yes, but he specifically clarified in earlier posta he was talking about pure pirate rogue and not piracle. Which is what makes his statements so ridiculous

The only thing ridiculous is how immature you are trying to pretend you have the bigger 8==D. 

Everyone obviously kknows he meant piracle you just have to get all technical and shit.

Grow up man Deadset. People like you who have nothing better to do but belittle others are what ruin Hearthstones Community.

Quote from TheWamts >>

Quote from bobknobslobr >>

http://www.vicioussyndicate.com/vs-data-reaper-report-31/

@sherman

Why do you do this to yourself? Pirate rogue isnt even t4 let alone t3. Its not on the list period.

And there you go assuming im playing the decks you dislike because im calling you out on your weak and groundless, factfree pseudo arguement

 

 Miracle Rogue is technically a Pirate Rogue deck.

In the same way Freeze Mage is technically a Face Mage deck,

Quote from notsoclutch >>

Quote from Tulio90 >>

The biggest disappointment for me this meta is the only warrior u see is pirate warrior atm. In the past it has patron,controll,dragon etc. The same goes a little bit for warlock which has renolock. I kinda miss the old gods to. Yogg, n,zoth C ,thun are gone already in this meta.

 Control, dragon and patron are all viable on ladder. face warrior just ladders quickly so its a better deck for laddering.  

Quote from aTouchofZen >>

P

 

TL;DR
I admit I play those net decks myself, so I can't complain too much, but still it feels disappointing after the rotation and all those new cards released that it hasn't really created a lot of diversity in the meta.

Quote from Railoe >>

I'm a new player, started about a month ago. I'm about 16-13 in ranked play and this game starts to feel very repetitive, there are 1000 cards playable and yet the game is filled with 3-4 standard deck types, with no real variation. Not sure if i'm stuck in a ''newbie'' zone where people copy paste the decks shown for example here and that's why they are overpopulated decks in the ranks i'm playing at.

9/10 the opponent is playing 1.jade druid 2.pirate warrior or 3.dragon priest 4.Buff paladin, the 1/10 time is a kazakus/reno mage or sometimes a warlock. Dunno why people don't try to build their own decks instead of just copy paste.

http://www.vicioussyndicate.com/vs-data-reaper-report-31/

@sherman

Why do you do this to yourself? Pirate rogue isnt even t4 let alone t3. Its not on the list period.

And there you go assuming im playing the decks you dislike because im calling you out on your weak and groundless, factfree pseudo arguement

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Quote from bobknobslobr >>

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Quote from bobknobslobr >>

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Quote from bobknobslobr >>

 yep, rock, paper, scissors is cancer. We should only allow rock vs rock. better yet lets all just uninstall and play chess. Thats ultimately where your conclusions lead mr. F..king genius. So nuanced, so intelligent. Lets deride someone for being insulting even though we can't get through a single post with out being unnecessarily condescending, which is itself insulting. You are truly something, that much is clear.

Lol, this people... You are so funny. I'm talking about CANCEROUS aggro decks bro, not ALL aggro decks, do you understand the difference, Einstein? Or do I have to repeat the words "cancer" and "cancerous" in every single post I make?

 you seem to do that already. And by your apparent definition of cancer, that includes all viable aggro decks. So, einstein(i hope the irony of your choice to be condescending again is not comepletely lost on you), unless you have an example of a noncancerous aggro deck to offer up i think the conclusions are clear.

Are you serious, bro? Is that the best thing you can do? Really? Do you even think before posting? Why do you make things so easy for me? :(

But ok, if you want an answer... Pirate Rogue, a deck from the current meta. :)

Edit: I hope you weren't refering to Piracle rogue which is clearly miracle rogue which, while it can be quick, is not an aggro deck.

I was obviously refering to Pirate Rogue, which is definetly an aggro deck, that is why I wrote "Pirate Rogue" bro.

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Quote from bobknobslobr >>

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Quote from bobknobslobr >>

 yep, rock, paper, scissors is cancer. We should only allow rock vs rock. better yet lets all just uninstall and play chess. Thats ultimately where your conclusions lead mr. F..king genius. So nuanced, so intelligent. Lets deride someone for being insulting even though we can't get through a single post with out being unnecessarily condescending, which is itself insulting. You are truly something, that much is clear.

Lol, this people... You are so funny. I'm talking about CANCEROUS aggro decks bro, not ALL aggro decks, do you understand the difference, Einstein? Or do I have to repeat the words "cancer" and "cancerous" in every single post I make?

 you seem to do that already. And by your apparent definition of cancer, that includes all viable aggro decks. So, einstein(i hope the irony of your choice to be condescending again is not comepletely lost on you), unless you have an example of a noncancerous aggro deck to offer up i think the conclusions are clear.

Are you serious, bro? Is that the best thing you can do? Really? Do you even think before posting? Why do you make things so easy for me? :(

But ok, if you want an answer... Pirate Rogue, a deck from the current meta. :)

Edit: I hope you weren't refering to Piracle rogue which is clearly miracle rogue which, while it can be quick, is not an aggro deck.

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Quote from bobknobslobr >>

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Quote from DirtyRat3000 >>

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Quote from DirtyRat3000 >>

Quote from mess >>

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Aggro Shaman and Pirate Warrior are CANCER.

 Wrong. 

 

Reno is the real cancer.

The only reason people play hyper aggressive agro is to win before turn 6... why do you need to win before turn 6? Because Reno Jackson. If there was no Reno, we wouldn't see nearly as many hyper aggressive decks.

 Totally agree. When they have Reno on their hand, they happily emote and make stupid plays. They have many taunts and removals but when you manage to kill them they just cry instead of congratulating.

Really? Why should they congratulate you? For what? For playing a mindless deck? LOL, you have to be kidding...

 Do you like football? Most people hate Jose Mourinho because his team plays to win, not to entertain football fans. When I want to win, I play the winning decks. This game does not reward how good you played but the result. Pirate Warrior is a well working deck. I play Pirate Warrior and do my thing. And you play something requires a lot of intelligence and talent. For what? Just for complaining about the decks you cannot beat.

 Well Played.

Yeah, I like football and I understand your point. Most people who play with this aggro decks do it because they want to win, that is true, but one thing is just playing with those decks and other is defending them on the forums. You know you are doing something wrong mate and those decks are cancer, at least have the dignity to recognize that, instead of saying silly things about people who use Reno decks. If you really can't win with any other type of deck, I'm fine with that, we are not all equal, but please, don't say silly things to try to justify your actions.

 yep, rock, paper, scissors is cancer. We should only allow rock vs rock. better yet lets all just uninstall and play chess. Thats ultimately where your conclusions lead mr. F..king genius. So nuanced, so intelligent. Lets deride someone for being insulting even though we can't get through a single post with out being unnecessarily condescending, which is itself insulting. You are truly something, that much is clear.

Lol, this people... You are so funny. I'm talking about CANCEROUS aggro decks bro, not ALL aggro decks, do you understand the difference, Einstein? Or do I have to repeat the words "cancer" and "cancerous" in every single post I make?

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Quote from DirtyRat3000 >>

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Quote from DirtyRat3000 >>

Quote from mess >>

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Aggro Shaman and Pirate Warrior are CANCER.

 Wrong. 

 

Reno is the real cancer.

The only reason people play hyper aggressive agro is to win before turn 6... why do you need to win before turn 6? Because Reno Jackson. If there was no Reno, we wouldn't see nearly as many hyper aggressive decks.

 Totally agree. When they have Reno on their hand, they happily emote and make stupid plays. They have many taunts and removals but when you manage to kill them they just cry instead of congratulating.

Really? Why should they congratulate you? For what? For playing a mindless deck? LOL, you have to be kidding...

 Do you like football? Most people hate Jose Mourinho because his team plays to win, not to entertain football fans. When I want to win, I play the winning decks. This game does not reward how good you played but the result. Pirate Warrior is a well working deck. I play Pirate Warrior and do my thing. And you play something requires a lot of intelligence and talent. For what? Just for complaining about the decks you cannot beat.

 Well Played.

Yeah, I like football and I understand your point. Most people who play with this aggro decks do it because they want to win, that is true, but one thing is just playing with those decks and other is defending them on the forums. You know you are doing something wrong mate and those decks are cancer, at least have the dignity to recognize that, instead of saying silly things about people who use Reno decks. If you really can't win with any other type of deck, I'm fine with that, we are not all equal, but please, don't say silly things to try to justify your actions.

Quote from LsmileL >>

Too many retarded cards force to play stupid decks.

Aggro and its Counters (like dragon priest) both are very simple and unattractive decks.

If we take away aggro - we are facing Auctioneers into conceal etc or Jade Idols. Also epicly boring and unfair decks.

Reno decks are the only nice, but only Warlock is competitive. WTF Blizzard ?