Hearthpwn

 Just accept defeat and stop adding people to flame them.

Quote from Zangoosed >>

For those who are voting "no" please tell us when it was worse and in detail why you think it was worse.

 

 When it was worse than now? When they'll launch a new tribe and/or new heroes in the future. I don't remember people saying BGs are balanced. 

Quote from Inzan1ty >>

 

But I predict they will change the Reward System even more in their favour in the future, removing or reducing the amount of Gold for daily Quests, so then they force you to waste even more money ...

 They will with the new Battle Pass. And yes, Blizzard is aware that people who will spend money on it won't do it with a smile on their face. But still, money is money, doesn't matter where it comes from.

Don't play it then? 

Turn 6 you say? Sounds like your opponent was generous and let you enjoy your deck. You should thank them by buying them 60 packs. 

No need for emergency nerfs. The packs are selling. Wait until their sales campaign ends.

Quote from Chreezer >>

I am very salty yeah.

 Besides the stupid aggro meta because of the existence of Glide and the OP Druid at this Moment, I just had to learn, that Mindrender Illucia is bugged!

My opponent played her and stole my Galakrond. He used it. After that I used his Kronx and Zephrys to waste them. 
The next turn both decks swapped as they should and immediately swapped back, so that I had to play and lose with his shitty deck. What the fuck Blizzard?! Can‘t you do nothing right?!

 

 You mean I can make priest deck with only useless cards and give it to my opponent for the rest of the match!? Thanks buddy, that's just what I needed to hear.

Quote from Filipter33 >>

I remake the thread because I didn't give argumentation and was closed so I will try it better.

 

WTF were Team5 thinking when designed Lightning Bloom for druid? This just makes an already disgusting deck even worse to play against.

It is a bullsh*it because it makes a unfun deck to play against even more highroll and can blast any other deck by turn 4 with just a little bit of luck. Any thoughts?

 What were they thinking? How to sell more packs? How to make the game more easy and accessible to everyone, including your pet gold fish? How to create an unforgettable experiences for players so that the ones who lose to these kind of high rolls will buy packs with money because they want a quick dose of happiness even if it's for a short time? The list can go on. 

But one thing's for sure, they didn't ask themselves: How to offer players an enjoyable experience with HS? Honestly, Lighting Bloom fits well into HS' casual style game play. 

Also, considering your experience with ladder, I bet 20$ for a BG Tavern Pass doesn't sound so bad after all. Am I right?

Quote from OoZuNoO >>

 

When they try to make balanced sets, shit like TgT, Rastakhans Crap happens! Which do you prefer? 

 That's because the previous sets weren't balanced. TgT was alright, I really liked  Nexus-Champion Saraad. The problem was we didn't have many resource generation cards, discovery wasn't invented back then and becuase of that, control vs control matchups were about who gets to fatigue first loses. But let's not forget TgT introduced Secret pally, a deck which even bots could reach legend with.

And Rastakhan would have been nice too if it weren't for Baku/Genn and DKs. Not to mention druid's iron shell.

OP, you must really suck at real life if you get hurt by the internet. 

Quote from Mackie264 >>

Quote from Dauthdaert1 >>

In a way I support this design philosophy in Digital Card Games because they're mostly free and errata can just be applied through patches.  Its a little more frustrating because of the raw power some of these cards have, but i do have a genuine question.

Would you rather them make underwhelming cards that aren't powerful?  As a business trying to get money off of a free game, they need to make purchasing packs with money seem appealing somehow.

Would it be better if the evergreen sets, Basic and Classic, had a higher level of power itself, to balance out new cards entering at this standard?

 No, I would like Blizzard to actually hire competent testers that care about doing their job at least a little bit. I'm not saying they should just print bland and boring cards, they obviously need to keep printing cards that powercreep the classic set cause they need to keep selling packs. But you can't seriously justify the absolute clusterfuck that Demon Hunter was at its launch and you can't deny that there are some cards (again like Passage or Omu) that just look too overtuned even before the expansion has arrived

 Why should they hire competent testers when we test their cards for free? Some of us even pay Blizzard to test those cards. Also, if enough people support their business model, then is Blizzard really doing anything wrong?

Quote from Zangoosed >>

Quote from Motions >>

Did you just tilt fella? The rant topic is to be found elsewhere.

 The opposite actually, fella. I had the easiest 1st place of my life with her. Felt unfair.

 Congratulations fella! For your information, the majority of fellas don't care about fairness when they win. In fact, they actually like when they win in the most unfair way possible. 

Hearthstone is a turn based game where the attacker chooses what to attack. It's kinda normal for aggro to dominate. Besides, if you experienced Undertakerstone and Piratestone, then there's no reason to be concerned.

Pre-nerf demon hunter sasys “hi”.